Birth and Delivery Birth Setting and Provider

The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States

Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, McLemore M, Cadena M, Nethery E, Rushton E, Schummers L, Declercq E

Published June 11, 2019 Reproductive Health
DOI 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2 PMID 31182118 PMC PMC6558766

RRM Academy Synopsis

One in six women in a US survey reported childbirth mistreatment

One in six (17.3%) of 2138 US women surveyed reported mistreatment during maternity care. In this voluntary cross-sectional survey, about 28 out of 100 women who gave birth in hospitals reported mistreatment, against about 5 out of 100 who gave birth at home.

Key Findings

  • Of 2138 women who completed the survey, 369 (17.3%) reported one or more of seven mistreatment indicators. Being shouted at or scolded was the most common, reported by 182 women (8.5%).
  • Any mistreatment was reported by 213 of 759 women (28.1%) who gave birth in a hospital and by 44 of 871 women (5.1%) who gave birth at home.
  • By maternal race, any mistreatment was reported by 32.8% of Indigenous, 25.0% of Hispanic, 22.5% of Black and 21.1% of Asian women, and by 14.1% of white women.
  • Crude odds ratios for reported mistreatment: prenatal midwifery care 0.31 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.40); hospital or alongside birthing center birth against community birth 7.17 (95% CI 5.31 to 9.68).
  • A reported difference in opinion with the care provider carried a crude odds ratio of 22.69 (95% CI 13.94 to 36.92) for mistreatment, the largest of the crude odds ratios reported.

Interpretation

This cross-sectional survey asked 2138 women across the United States about their experiences during pregnancy and childbirth. The authors sampled for diversity, and about half of the women (49.6%) gave birth at home or in a freestanding birth center. Reported mistreatment rates varied widely by birth setting and by maternal race, and women who disagreed with their provider about care reported the highest odds of mistreatment. The authors note that the timing of the links among difference of opinion, interventions and mistreatment needs further study. The findings support larger, population-based studies of mistreatment during maternity care.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine starts from the patient's own account of her body and history, and from informed consent. The survey's patient-designed items count how often maternity care falls short of that standard, such as ignoring a request for help or threatening to withhold treatment. Women who disagreed with a provider about the right care reported the highest rates of mistreatment.

Abstract

Background

Recently WHO researchers described seven dimensions of mistreatment in maternity care that have adverse impacts on quality and safety. Applying the WHO framework for quality care, service users partnered with NGOs, clinicians, and researchers, to design and conduct the Giving Voice to Mothers (GVtM)-US study.

Methods

Our multi-stakeholder team distributed an online cross-sectional survey to capture lived experiences of maternity care in diverse populations. Patient-designed items included indicators of verbal and physical abuse, autonomy, discrimination, failure to meet professional standards of care, poor rapport with providers, and poor conditions in the health system. We quantified the prevalence of mistreatment by race, socio-demographics, mode of birth, place of birth, and context of care, and describe the intersectional relationships between these variables.

Results

Of eligible participants (n = 2700), 2138 completed all sections of the survey. One in six women (17.3%) reported experiencing one or more types of mistreatment such as: loss of autonomy; being shouted at, scolded, or threatened; and being ignored, refused, or receiving no response to requests for help. Context of care (e.g. mode of birth; transfer; difference of opinion) correlated with increased reports of mistreatment. Experiences of mistreatment differed significantly by place of birth: 5.1% of women who gave birth at home versus 28.1% of women who gave birth at the hospital. Factors associated with a lower likelihood of mistreatment included having a vaginal birth, a community birth, a midwife, and being white, multiparous, and older than 30 years. Rates of mistreatment for women of colour were consistently higher even when examining interactions between race and other maternal characteristics. For example, 27.2% of women of colour with low SES reported any mistreatment versus 18.7% of white women with low SES. Regardless of maternal race, having a partner who was Black also increased reported mistreatment.

Conclusion

This is the first study to use indicators developed by service users to describe mistreatment in childbirth in the US. Our findings suggest that mistreatment is experienced more frequently by women of colour, when birth occurs in hospitals, and among those with social, economic or health challenges. Mistreatment is exacerbated by unexpected obstetric interventions, and by patient-provider disagreements.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Birth and Delivery › Birth Setting and Provider › Hospital Birth · Ethics and Policy › Advocacy and Public Understanding › Patient Advocacy
Saraswathi Vedam, Kathrin Stoll, Tanya Khemet Taiwo, Nicholas Rubashkin, Melissa Cheyney, Nan Strauss, Monica McLemore, Micaela Cadena, Elizabeth Nethery, Eleanor Rushton, Laura Schummers, Eugene Declercq
S Vedam, K Stoll, T Taiwo, Nick Rubashkin, N Rubashkin, M Cheyney, N Strauss, M McLemore, M Cadena, Liz Nethery, Beth Nethery, Betsy Nethery, E Nethery, E Rushton, L Schummers, E Declercq
PMID 31182118 31182118 DOI 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2 Vedam et al. 2019, Vedam 2019