International Journal of Fertility, 33 Suppl, 52-53, 1988
Abstract
A 12-month evaluation of the Ovulation Method of Natural Family Planning programme in Bangladesh is presented. Four hundred and forty-eight women entered the programme, 232 for spacing, 184 for limiting, and 32 to achieve pregnancy. Of the participating couples, 79% lived in rural areas and 20.3% were illiterate. The 416 who learned the ovulation method for avoiding pregnancy completed 2,358 months of use, with 14 unplanned pregnancies during the study period, which represents a pregnancy rate of 7.2 according to the Pearl Index. The discontinuation rate in the 12-month period was 2.4%.
Topics
ovulation method natural family planning Bangladesh, Billings ovulation method developing country effectiveness, natural family planning program rural Bangladesh Pearl Index, cervical mucus method family planning low literacy population, NFP effectiveness developing country pregnancy rate, natural family planning discontinuation rate program evaluation, ovulation method spacing limiting pregnancy avoidance, Gomes Congdon Bangladesh natural family planning, fertility awareness based methods illiterate populations, family planning program evaluation 12 month Bangladesh
Gomes et al. 1988, Gomes 1988
Cite this article
Gomes, I., & Congdon, D. E. (1988). The natural family planning programme in Bangladesh. International journal of fertility, 33 Suppl, 52-53.
Gomes I, Congdon DE. The natural family planning programme in Bangladesh. Int J Fertil. 1988;33 Suppl:52-53.
Gomes, I., and David E. Congdon. "The natural family planning programme in Bangladesh." International journal of fertility, vol. 33 Suppl, 1988, pp. 52-53.
Related articles
Effectiveness · Typical and Perfect Use
Effectiveness of the sympto-thermal method of natural family planning: an international study
Rice FJ et al., 1981 · Int J Fertil ·
A 2-year international study involving NFP (natural family planning) associations in 5 countries (Canada Colombia France Mauritius U.S.) was conducted to evaluate statistically the effectiveness of the sympto-thermal method an NFP method which adds to the temperatiure method the observation of signs and symptoms of the ovulatory period. 1022 couples (21736 couples) were selected on the following criteria: 1) the wife had to be between 19 and 44 years of age 2) the wife had to be of proven fertility by having carried a fetus for at least 28 weeks 3) the couple must have submitted 1 satisfactory temperature graphy before being accepted and 4) the couple must have expressed a willingness to submit temperature graphs for 2 years. 826 couples completed 24 months. Menstrual cycle length varied from 9 to 98 days with an average of 28.43 days. 205 women had a variation of 8 days or less. 128 unplanned pregnancies occured giving a rate of 7.47 conceptions/100 woman-years of exposure. Theoretical effectiveness was .93 pregnancies/100 woman-years using the Pearl Formula; 16 pregnancies occured in couples following instructions. Failure rate was 4.13% for couples trying to prevent pregnancies and 14.83% for couples only delaying a pregnancy. Failure rate of the method used alone was 7.16%; 8.19% used with other contraceptives. There was an average of 13 cycles per year per woman. Using the modified Pearl index (pregnancies per 1300 cycles rather than per 1200 months) the pregnancy rate was 7.66% vs. 7.47% for 1200 months. The study shows that the sympto-thermal method is effective and reliable. 2 issues remain unresolved: 1) whether a large group of people will accept a method that depends on periodic abstinence or 2) whether the method will be just as effective when used by couples who are not as well motivated as the participants in this study.
Effectiveness · Typical and Perfect Use
Pregnancies, intentions, and fertility behaviors during use of the Creighton Model FertilityCare System after initial intention to avoid pregnancy: Results from the Creighton Model effectiveness, intentions, behaviors assessment study
Stanford JB et al., 2025 · PLoS One · Open Access
Knowledge of the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle can be applied to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. Fertility intentions and sexual behaviors during the fertile time may influence whether and when pregnancy occurs. The Creighton Model FertilityCare System (CrMS) is a specific system of fertility appreciation used to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. The objective of this paper is to report intentions, behaviors, and pregnancy rates during use of the CrMS among couples who initially intended to avoid pregnancy.Data and methodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort study conducted in 17 CrMS centers across the USA and Canada, following 296 couples for up to one year after onset of initial use of the CrMS to avoid pregnancy. Baseline data included demographics, motivations, and pregnancy intentions for each partner. Couples contributed 2894 menstrual cycles, most of which had data collected (by questionnaires and daily diary) on cycle-specific pregnancy intentions, days of potential fertility, and fertility behaviors. Pregnancies were prospectively actively ascertained. We found a high concordance (91%) in cycle pregnancy intentions between partners. However, 44% of cycles with strong intentions to avoid pregnancy included intercourse on potentially fertile days or days of undetermined fertility status. Across all sensitivity scenarios, cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to conceive ranged from 88.0% to 89.8%, and cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to avoid ranged from 29.1% to 35.3%. In multivariate analysis, baseline motivations and intentions for pregnancy within 2 years were strongly correlated with the likelihood of pregnancy, more so than cycle intentions. The findings suggest that in some populations using natural family planning, baseline motivations and intentions may be more strongly related to pregnancy rates than cycle intentions. Our findings also highlight essential elements for evaluating correct use, including complete recording of intercourse and its timing.
Effectiveness · Typical and Perfect Use
The State of the Science of Natural Family Planning: A Report from NFP Scientists' Meeting Held in Orlando, FL, September 4, 2024
Manhart MD et al., 2025 · Linacre Q · Open Access
A one-day meeting was held as a pre-conference to the Catholic Medical Association Annual Educational event in 2024. A panel of eighteen physicians, scientists, and researchers involved in NFP work was convened to review the available evidence in four topical areas: (i) evidence for effectiveness of NFP methods to postpone and achieve pregnancy, (ii) evidence for effectiveness in the postpartum and perimenopause transition periods, (iii) evaluate the current state of technology in NFP (specifically app and quantitative hormone monitoring), and (iv) evidence examining the impact of NFP on marital relations. In each topical area, the panel worked to reach a consensus opinion on the currently available evidence and identified priorities for further research. Results from these discussions and a set of priorities for further work are presented here. An expert panel was convened to review the current evidence supporting use of NFP in various settings, utilization of new technology, and the impact of NFP on marital dynamics. Results from these discussions and a set of priorities for further work are presented here.
Effectiveness · Typical and Perfect Use
Evaluating Pregnancy Rates in Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Family Planning: Simulated Comparison of Correct Use to Avoid, Method-Related, and Total Pregnancy Rates
Stanford JB et al., 2024 · Linacre Q · Open Access
Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs), also known as natural family planning (NFP), enable couples to identify the days of the menstrual cycle when intercourse may result in pregnancy ("fertile days"), and to avoid intercourse on fertile days if they wish to avoid pregnancy. Thus, these methods are fully dependent on user behavior for effectiveness to avoid pregnancy. For couples and clinicians considering the use of an FABM, one important metric to consider is the highest expected effectiveness (lowest possible pregnancy rate) during the correct use of the method to avoid pregnancy. To assess this, most studies of FABMs have reported a method-related pregnancy rate (a cumulative proportion), which is calculated based on all cycles (or months) in the study. In contrast, the correct use to avoid pregnancy rate (also a cumulative proportion) has the denominator of cycles with the correct use of the FABM to avoid pregnancy. The relationship between these measures has not been evaluated quantitatively. We conducted a series of simulations demonstrating that the method-related pregnancy rate is artificially decreased in direct proportion to the proportion of cycles with intermediate use (any use other than correct use to avoid or targeted use to conceive), which also increases the total pregnancy rate. Thus, as the total pregnancy rate rises (related to intermediate use), the method-related pregnancy rate falls artificially while the correct use pregnancy rate remains constant. For practical application, we propose the core elements needed to assess correct use cycles in FABM studies. Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) can be used by couples to avoid pregnancy, by avoiding intercourse on fertile days. Users want to know what the highest effectiveness (lowest pregnancy rate) would be if they use an FABM correctly and consistently to avoid pregnancy. In this simulation study, we compare two different measures: (1) the method-related pregnancy rate; and (2) the correct use pregnancy rate. We show that the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low if some users in the study are not using the method consistently to avoid pregnancy, while the correct use pregnancy rate obtains an accurate estimate. SHORT In FABM studies, the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low, but the correct use pregnancy rate is unbiased.