To evaluate the risk of radiation exposure to infertility patients during a gynecoradiologic procedure.
Design
Retrospective clinical study.
Setting
Medical school-affiliated infertility center.
PATIENT(S): Three hundred thirty-two consecutive infertility patients undergoing a gynecoradiologic procedure.
INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent a gynecoradiologic procedure as part of their infertility workup and the fluoroscopic exposure time was analyzed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The fluoroscopic exposure (rad time) during gynecoradiologic procedures, including hysterosalpingogram (HSG), selective salpingography, tubal catheterization, and others.
RESULT(S): The rad time (mean +/- SD) was 63 +/- 54 seconds for normal HSG (n = 94, range 17 to 404 seconds), 100 +/- 61 seconds for abnormal HSG (n = 53, range 28 to 272 seconds), 111 +/- 57 seconds for unilateral selective salpingography (n = 36, range 31 to 324 seconds), 142 +/- 74 seconds for bilateral selective salpingography (n = 87, range 40 to 430 seconds), 176 +/- 77 seconds for unilateral tubal catheterization (n = 27, range 70 to 342 seconds), and 239 +/- 82 seconds for bilateral tubal catheterization (n = 30, range 110 to 381 seconds). Five patients had other procedures, such as lysis of intrauterine adhesions (n = 2) and resection of an uterine septum (n = 3), for which the rad time was in a range of 180 to 300 seconds.
CONCLUSION(S): The radiation exposure of patients during a gynecoradiologic procedure, using previously described standard techniques, is well within established margins of safety.
PMID 9022623 9022623 DOI 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81931-0 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81931-0 Karande et al. 1997, Karande 1997
Cite this article
Karande, V. C., Pratt, D. E., Balin, M. S., Levrant, S. G., Morris, R. S., & Gleicher, N. (1997). What is the radiation exposure to patients during a gynecoradiologic procedure?. Fertility and sterility, 67(2), 401-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81931-0
Karande VC, Pratt DE, Balin MS, Levrant SG, Morris RS, Gleicher N. What is the radiation exposure to patients during a gynecoradiologic procedure?. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(2):401-403. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81931-0
Karande, V. C., et al. "What is the radiation exposure to patients during a gynecoradiologic procedure?." Fertility and sterility, vol. 67, no. 2, 1997, pp. 401-403.
To assess the intratubal pressure (ITP) and patency status of the fallopian tubes before and after transcervical catheterization of the fallopian tubes (TCFT). Prospective procedural assessment. Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction. PATIENT(S): Two hundred thirty-four women with either primary or secondary infertility. INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent selective hysterosalpingography and, in some cases, TCFT with measurement of the ITP before and after the procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The ITP before and after TCFT. RESULT(S): The mean (+/-SD) ITP in freely patent tubes was 0.53 +/- 0.06 atm, that in partially obstructed tubes was 1.23 +/- 0.52 atm, and that in completely obstructed tubes was 2.79 +/- 1.40 atm. After TCFT, the mean (+/-SD) ITP in partially obstructed tubes decreased to 0.64 +/- 0.31 atm and that in completely obstructed tubes decreased to 1.86 +/- 1.35 atm. The ITP was normalized in 76% of partially obstructed tubes and in 29.5% of completely obstructed tubes. In all cases of complete obstruction in which surgical correction was attempted, organic pathology was identified. CONCLUSION(S): The procedure described is a safe and easy means of obtaining reliable and significant information on the status of the proximal fallopian tube.
To determine whether the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) could be improved if routine spot films were replaced by an on-line recorded gynecoradiologic study.
Medical school-affiliated private infertility center.
In 1992, a review of 152 infertile women with infertility who demonstrated a normal HSG, by standard criteria of spot film evaluation, in 117 (77%). They were further investigated by gynecoradiologic study if the HSG revealed asymmetrical tubal filling, an increased perfusion pressure, and/or evidence for abnormal tubal spill. In 1993, 47 women with normal HSG by spot film criteria underwent bilateral selective salpingography and were subdivided into those with normal (group I, n = 23) and abnormal (group II, n = 24) tubal perfusion pressures. Patients in both study groups then were treated for their infertility independently of pressure perfusion measurements.
Clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) over the ensuing 6 to 10 months. Among 117 women with apparently normal spot film HSG, 64 (55%) demonstrated asymmetrical tubal filling, 32 (27%) demonstrated abnormal spillage into the peritoneal cavity, and 55 (47%) demonstrated abnormally elevated injection pressures. Among 98 women who underwent bilateral selective salpingography, 43 (44%) demonstrated bilaterally normal tubal perfusion pressures and 55 (56%) showed an abnormally elevated pressure in at least one oviduct. Of 47 women that were followed prospectively in 1993, patients with normal perfusion pressure (group I) demonstrated a significantly higher PR than women with elevated tubal pressure (group II) from 2 months and on after the procedure. Routine spot film HSG is of limited value in assessing tubal status beyond the determination of tubal patency. Especially with regard to fertility potential, HSG should be replaced by gynecoradiologic study.
To investigate the role of transcervical tubal catheterization in diagnosis and treatment of proximal tubal obstruction associated with salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Retrospective case study. University hospital and outpatient radiology practice. Fifty-two women with proximal tubal obstruction associated with salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Selective salpingography and catheter recanalization using fluoroscopic guidance. The number of tubes visualized to the fimbria as a percentage of the tubes with proximal tubal obstruction on the initial hysterosalpingogram was determined as a measure of diagnostic efficacy. To evaluate the treatment potential of catheter recanalization, the patients were grouped according to tubal status at the conclusion of the procedure and subsequent pregnancies were evaluated. Forty-seven of 65 tubes (72%) with proximal tubal obstruction were recanalized successfully. Among the 19 women who were able to conceive only via a recanalized salpingitis isthmica nodosa tube, there were 6 live births (32%) and two tubal pregnancies (10%). Selective salpingography allows complete tubal diagnosis in almost three fourths of patients with proximal tubal obstruction and salpingitis isthmica nodosa. The radiographic diagnosis of salpingitis isthmica nodosa may be pressure dependent. Intrauterine pregnancies occur via recanalized salpingitis isthmica nodosa tubes, therefore catheter recanalization may be attempted before tubal microsurgery or IVF in patients with proximal tubal obstruction and associated salpingitis isthmica nodosa.
To characterize ampullary endosalpingeal findings in women with occlusive or nonocclusive salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Prospective case study. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of a University Hospital. Twenty women (38 tubes) with occlusive or nonocclusive salpingitis isthmica nodosa were studied. Salpingoscopy was performed during diagnostic laparoscopy in 20 women (38 tubes) with hysterosalpingographic evidence of salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Salpingoscopic findings were recorded and the patients were managed accordingly. Of the 38 tubes 10 appeared radiographically and laparoscopically normal. Two tubes were occluded distally. Of the 26 tubes with occlusive or nonocclusive salpingitis isthmica nodosa, 5 (19.2%) showed varying degrees of endosalpingeal abnormality. Patients with abnormal salpingoscopy were regarded as having bipolar tubal disease and were referred for assisted conception. The remaining patients were scheduled for microsurgical tubal reconstruction. One in five patients with proximal tubal disease may have ampullary endosalpingeal damage of varying degrees. However, the significance of this finding in relation to subsequent management strategies and fertility outcome is yet to be characterized.