General Gynecology · Pelvic Pain

What's the delay? A qualitative study of women's experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis

Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J

Published November 2006 Fertility and Sterility
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054 PMID 17070183

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the reasons women experience delays in the diagnosis of endometriosis and the impact of this.

Design

A qualitative interview-based study of 32 women, 28 of whom were subsequently diagnosed with endometriosis.

Setting

Southeast England.

Patients

Women attending a pelvic pain clinic.

Interventions

Semistructured interviews.

Main Outcome Measures

Women's reported experiences of being diagnosed with endometriosis.

Results

Delays in the diagnosis of endometriosis occur at an individual patient level and a medical level, as both women and family doctors normalize symptoms, symptoms are suppressed through hormones, and nondiscriminatory investigations are relied upon. Women benefited from a diagnosis, because it provided a language in which to discuss their condition, offered possible management strategies to control symptoms, and provided reassurance that symptoms were not due to cancer. Diagnosis also sanctioned women's access to social support and legitimized absences from social and work obligations.

Conclusions

Although recent guidelines for the management of chronic pelvic pain suggest that diagnostic laparoscopy may be considered a secondary investigation after the failure of therapeutic interventions, the present study highlights the importance of an early diagnosis for women who suffer at physical, emotional, and social levels when they remain undiagnosed.

Topics

By this author

Related research

General Gynecology › Pelvic Pain › Chronic Pelvic Pain · Endometriosis › Diagnosis › Diagnostic Delay · Mental Health and Psychosocial Care › Psychosocial Support › Peer and Community Support
Karen Ballard, Karen Lowton, Jeremy Wright
K Ballard, K Lowton, J Wright
PMID 17070183 17070183 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054 Ballard et al. 2006, Ballard 2006