Abstract
Defined criteria were used to select small samples of visually normal study peritoneum for serial section light microscopy in 45 patients with biopsy-proven endometriosis and 10 patients without endometriosis. A glandular element compatible with possible endometriosis was found in only 1 patient. Visually normal peritoneum does not harbor a high prevalence of invisible microscopic endometriosis.
Responses
Attachment of endometrial cells to peritoneum--facilitated?
Redwine DB, 2001 · Fertility and sterility
By this author
Bowel Invisible Microscopic Endometriosis: Leave It Alone
Redwine DB et al., 2018 · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
Dissecting and temporarily resuspending the adherent ovary
Redwine DB, 2006 · Fertility and sterility
Complications of laparoscopic surgery: How to avoid them and how to repair them
Shirk GJ et al., 2006 · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
Variations in tubal configuration in endometriosis?
Redwine DB, 2006 · Fertility and sterility
Related research
Occult microscopic endometriosis: undetectable by laparoscopy in normal peritoneum
Khan KN et al., 2014 · Human Reproduction
Is there any occurrence of hidden (occult) endometriotic lesions in normal peritoneum of women with and without visible endometriosis? We detected a slightly higher occurrence of occult microscopic endometriosis (OME) in normal peritoneum of women with visible endometriosis than in control women. Based on a small number of cases, the concept of invisible microscopic endometriosis in visually normal peritoneum has been reported for more than a decade but there is controversy regarding their tissue activity and clinical significance. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, This case-controlled research study was conducted with prospectively collected normal peritoneal samples from 151 women with and 62 women without visible endometriosis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, Normal peritoneal biopsy specimens from different pelvic sites of were collected during laparoscopy. A histological search of all peritoneal biopsy specimens for the detection of invisible endometriosis was done by immunoreaction to Ber-EP4 (epithelial cell marker), CD10 (stromal cell marker) and Calretinin (mesothelial cell marker). Tissue expression of estrogen/progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and cell proliferation marker, Ki-67, was performed by immunohistochemistry to identify tissue activity. MAIN Three different patterns of OME were detected based on (I) the presence of typical gland/stroma, (II) reactive hyperplastic change of endometrioid epithelial cells with surrounding stroma and (III) single-layered epithelium-lined cystic lesions with surrounding stroma. A higher tendency toward the occurrence of OME was found in women with visible endometriosis (15.2%, 23/151) compared with control women (6.4%, 4/62) (P = 0.06, χ(2) test). The epithelial cells and/or stromal cells of OME lesions were immunoreactive to Ber-EP4 and CD10 but not reactive to Calretinin. ER and PR expression was observed in all patterns of OME lesions. Ki-67 index was significantly higher in pattern I/II OME lesions than in pattern III OME lesions (P< 0.05 for each). LIMITATIONS, Bias in the incidence rate of OME lesions in this study cannot be ignored, because we could not analyze biopsy specimens from the Pouch of Douglas of women with revised classification of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine Stage III-IV endometriosis due to the presence of adhesions in the pelvis. We re-confirmed a decade long old concept of invisible (occult) endometriosis in visually normal peritoneum of women with visible endometriosis. The existence of a variable amount of tissue activity in these occult lesions may contribute to the recurrence/occurrence of endometriosis or persistence/recurrence of pain manifestation in women even after successful ablation or excision of visible lesions by laparoscopy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported in part by Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. There is no conflict of interest related to this study. Not applicable.
Higher prevalence of chronic endometritis in women with endometriosis: a possible etiopathogenetic link
Cicinelli E et al., 2017 · Fertility and sterility
To evaluate the association between endometriosis end chronic endometritis (CE) diagnosed by hysteroscopy, conventional histology, and immunohistochemistry. Case-control study. University hospital. PATIENT(S): Women with and without endometriosis who have undergone hysterectomy. INTERVENTION(S): Retrospective evaluation of 78 women who have undergone hysterectomy and were affected by endometriosis and 78 women without endometriosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): CE diagnosed based on conventional histology and immunohistochemistry with anti-syndecan-1 antibodies to identify CD138 cells. RESULT(S): The prevalence of CE was statistically significantly higher in the women with endometriosis as compared with the women who did not have endometriosis (33 of 78, 42.3% vs. 12 of 78, 15.4% according to hysteroscopy; and 30 of 78, 38.5% vs. 11 of 78, 14.1% according to histology). The women were divided into two groups, 115 patients without CE and 41 patients with CE. With univariate analysis, parity was associated with a lower risk for CE, and endometriosis was associated with a statistically significantly elevated risk of CE. Using multivariate analysis, parity continued to be associated with a lower incidence of CE, whereas endometriosis was associated with a 2.7 fold higher risk. CONCLUSION(S): The diagnosis of CE is more frequent in women with endometriosis. Although no etiologic relationships between CE and endometriosis can be established, this study suggests that CE should be considered and if necessary ruled out in women with endometriosis, particularly if they have abnormal uterine bleeding. Identification and appropriate treatment of CE may avoid unnecessary surgery.
'Invisible' microscopic endometriosis: a review
Redwine DB, 2003 · Gynecologic and obstetric investigation
Endometriosis can have very subtle visual appearances. All theories of origin imply some early and presumably tiny form of the disease which potentially cannot be detected by the unaided human eye. A review of the literature indicates that with increasing magnification at surgery, virtually all endometriosis can be visualized. Invisible microscopic endometriosis is an unproven entity which retards intellectual progress in the study of this disease.
Validation study of nonsurgical diagnosis of endometriosis
Eskenazi B et al., 2001 · Fertil Steril
To determine whether the surgical diagnosis of endometriosis can be predicted using symptoms, signs, and ultrasound findings. Prospective study (study sample); retrospective record review (test sample). Hospital of Desio (study sample) and Mangiagalli Hospital (test sample), Italy. PATIENT(S): Ninety women scheduled to undergo laparoscopy or laparotomy (study sample); 120 women who underwent laparoscopy (test sample). The study sample group was interviewed before surgery about infertility and dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and noncyclic pelvic pain and each member had a pelvic examination and a transvaginal ultrasound. At surgery, endometriosis was noted. For the test sample, the same information was abstracted from medical records after laparoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The ability of symptoms, signs, and ultrasound to predict endometriosis at surgery. A classification tree was developed with the study sample and evaluated with the test sample. RESULT(S): Ovarian endometriosis, but not nonovarian endometriosis, could be reliably predicted with noninvasive tools. Ultrasound and examination best predicted ovarian endometriosis, correctly classifying 100% of cases with no false positive diagnoses in the study sample. Similar results were found in the test sample. CONCLUSION(S): Noninvasive tools may be used to identify women with ovarian, but not nonovarian endometriosis, with excellent agreement with surgical diagnosis.