Reproductive Endocrinology · Luteal Phase

Clomiphene citrate therapy for luteal phase defect

Downs KA, Gibson M

Published January 1983 Fertility and Sterility, 39(1), 34-38
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46754-3 PMID 6848392

RRM Academy Synopsis

Severe luteal phase defect linked to more pregnancies on clomiphene

In a 1983 case series of 41 women treated with clomiphene for luteal phase defect, those whose uterine lining lagged five or more days conceived more often. Among women with no other fertility problem found, three in four with a large lag conceived, against fewer than one in ten with a smaller lag. The series came from one Vermont clinic.

Key Findings

  • The clinic diagnosed luteal phase defect in 47 of 366 women screened for infertility (12.7%), using a late-luteal biopsy confirmed by a second biopsy or serial progesterone tests.
  • Of 41 treated women, 16 (39%) conceived. The 44 courses of therapy produced 18 pregnancies, a crude conception rate of 40.9%.
  • Seven pregnancies came in the first cycle, five in the second and five in the third. No others followed except one ectopic pregnancy in the 11th cycle.
  • Among 25 women with no other fertility factor found, biopsy lag averaged 6.28 days in those who conceived and 4.32 days in those who did not (P < 0.02).
  • In that group, 9 of 12 women with a lag of 5 or more days conceived (75%). Only 1 of the 13 with a smaller lag conceived (P < 0.001).

Interpretation

The report is a case series from one clinic with no comparison group. Without untreated women for comparison, the data cannot separate clomiphene's effect from other reasons for pregnancy. The lag difference reached significance only in the 25 women with no other fertility factor found. Across all treated women, mean lag was 5.7 days in those who conceived and 4.9 in those who did not, which the authors call not significant. Couples with abnormal semen, cervical mucus or tubal findings were set aside for the smaller analysis. Group sizes are small, and the authors looked for group differences within their own data.

RRM Context

Unexplained infertility is undiagnosed, and a luteal phase problem is one diagnosable cause a workup can find. The authors graded each defect by days of biopsy lag. Grading the cause first fits the evaluation-first principle of Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM). The authors suggest reviewing the rest of the evaluation in women who do not respond.

Abstract

The incidence of luteal phase defects in 366 infertility patients was 12.7%. Life-table analysis was used for determination of the conception rate with clomiphene citrate therapy, and with this method, evidence was found for the presence of two subgroups with respect to response. The crude conception rate was 40.9%. In a group of patients with a luteal phase defect and no other infertility factors, those that conceived had a significantly larger mean biopsy delay than those who did not (6.28 days versus 4.32; P less than 0.02). In a group with a histologic delay of 5 days or more, the conception rate was 79%, while the rate was only 8.9% in those with a less severe deficit (P less than 0.001). Theoretic considerations for clomiphene citrate therapy are discussed.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Reproductive Endocrinology › Luteal Phase › Luteal Phase Deficiency · Infertility › Luteal Phase Defect › Diagnosis · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Disorders › Ovulatory Disturbances
Kevin A. Downs, Mark Gibson
K Downs, M Gibson
PMID 6848392 6848392 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46754-3 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46754-3 Downs et al. 1983, Downs 1983