Fertility Awareness Effectiveness

Efficacy of achieving pregnancy with fertility-focused intercourse

Mu Q, Fehring RJ

MCN. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 39(1), 35-40, 2014
DOI 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182a76b88 PMID 24317142

Abstract

Purpose

To compare pregnancy rates when women have intercourse on self-estimated high and peak fertile days and when they only have intercourse on low fertile days during the fertile window (FW).

Study Design

We used a prospective observational cohort study design. Our convenience sample included 124 women who utilized our online charting Web sites to achieve pregnancy from January 2010 to November 2012. Participants used an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) or self-observed cervical mucus or both to determine fertility during the estimated FW. Pregnancy rates were determined with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Chi square analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of achieving pregnancy between two different intercourse patterns.

Results

The pregnancy rate was 87 per 100 women at 12 months when intercourse happened on high or peak days and 5 per 100 when intercourse occurred only on low days of the FW. Chi square analysis showed a greater proportion of pregnancies with intercourse on high and peak fertile days of the menstrual cycle (x2 = 40.2, p < .001, df = 1).

Nursing Implications

Focusing intercourse on high or peak fertile days during the estimated FW enhances the probability of achieving a desired pregnancy. Fertility awareness-based online charting system is effective in helping women to determine their FW and target intercourse accordingly to achieve pregnancy.

Read the guide

  • Fertility Awareness Methods Compared

    Clinician-reviewed comparison of fertility awareness-based methods (Billings, Creighton, Sensiplan, Marquette, Standard Days, apps). Every effectiveness figure cited and labeled by metric.

    30 min read

Topics

By this author

Related research

Fertility Awareness › Effectiveness › Comparative Effectiveness · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Cervical Mucus
Qiyan Mu, Richard J Fehring
Q Mu, Rick Fehring, Dick Fehring, Rich Fehring, R Fehring
PMID 24317142 24317142 DOI 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182a76b88 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182a76b88 Mu et al. 2014, Mu 2014