To provide a contemporary approach to the understanding of the impact and methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis in Canada.
Target Population
Individuals, families, communities, health care providers, and health care administrators who are affected by, care for patients with, or manage delivery of services for endometriosis.
Options
The diagnosis of endometriosis is facilitated by a detailed history, examination, and imaging tests with providers who are experienced in endometriosis care. Surgical evaluation with pathology confirms a diagnosis of endometriosis; however, it is not required for those whose diagnosis was confirmed with imaging.
Outcomes
There is a need to address earlier recognition of endometriosis to facilitate timely access to care and support. Education directed at the public, affected individuals and families, health care providers, and health care administrators are essential to reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment.
Benefits, Harms, and Costs
Increased awareness and education about the impact and approach to diagnosis may support timely access to care for patients and families affected by endometriosis. Earlier and appropriate care may support a reduced health care system burden; however, improved clinical evaluation may require initial investments.
Evidence
Each section was reviewed with a unique search strategy representative of the evidence available in the literature related to the area of focus. The literature searches for each section of this guideline are listed in Appendix A and include information from published systematic reviews described in the text.
Validation Methods
The recommendations were developed following two rounds of review by a national expert panel through an iterative 2-year consensus process. Further details on the process are shared in Appendix B. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix C (Table C1 for definitions and Table C2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations).
Intended Users
This guideline is intended to support health care providers and policymakers involved in the care of those impacted by endometriosis and the systems required to support them.
Tweetable Abstract
Endometriosis impact and diagnosis updated guidelines for Canadian health care providers and policymakers.
Rojas HE et al., 2026·Journal of women's health (2002)
To characterize differences between individuals with and without mid-cycle pain in a registry cohort with endometriosis. Prospective analysis of data from the Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort Data Registry (Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02911090) at a tertiary referral center in Western Canada. Three hundred forty-five individuals aged 18-49 years who: (1) had at least one episode of menstrual bleeding in the last 3 months, (2) attended a baseline initial visit, and (3) subsequently had surgery with histological confirmation of endometriosis between January 2018 and December 2023. Exclusion criteria included (1) previous hysterectomy; (2) hormonal suppressive therapy use in the last 3 months; and (3) missing data on mid-cycle pain, history of hormonal therapy use, or menstrual cycle regularity. N/A. Mid-cycle pain in the last month versus No mid-cycle pain in the last month. Of the 345 participants, 67% (n = 232) reported mid-cycle pain in the last month. Mid-cycle pain in the last month was significantly associated with higher mean Central Sensitization Inventory score (48 ± 17 versus 36 ± 16, p < 0.001) and more months of prior hormonal suppressive therapy use (58 [14-120] versus 26 [0-109], p = 0.012). Abnormal anatomy at the time of surgery (e.g., endometrioma, ovarian adhesions) was not associated with mid-cycle pain in the last month. In this endometriosis cohort at a tertiary referral center, most participants reported mid-cycle pain in the last month, which was associated with central sensitization but was not clearly related to endometriosis anatomical distortion.
Bouchard TP et al., 2026·Reproductive biomedicine online·Free to read
Do quantitative urinary hormone measurements on the Mira monitor predict and confirm ovulation accurately compared with ultrasound in women with regular menstrual cycles? Do Mira urine hormones correlate with serum hormones?
This was a prospective, single-centre, blinded diagnostic accuracy study with 52 women aged 19-44 years with regular cycles (24-38 days) who tracked 153 cycles over 18 months. Daily first-morning urine was tested with the Mira monitor for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), oestrone-3-glucuronide (E13G), luteinizing hormone (LH) and pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG). Serial transvaginal ultrasounds (890 scans) confirmed the day of ovulation. Serum hormones were measured twice per cycle. The 121 ovulatory cycles from 49 participants with sufficient index test and reference standard data were included in the final analysis.
The Mira LH peak day strongly predicted ultrasound-confirmed ovulation (R² = 0.96, P < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.971), with 96% of ovulations occurring within ±1 day. The Mira PDG increase was also strongly associated with ultrasound-confirmed day of ovulation (R² = 0.87, P < 0.001). First-morning urine hormones were significantly associated with serum hormones when collected within 90 min (LH: R² = 0.92; E13G: R² = 0.73; R² = 0.61; R² = 0.75). Anovulatory cycles were identified in 11% of regularly cycling participants.
Quantitative urinary hormone monitoring with the Mira monitor provides accurate prediction and confirmation of ovulation, with strong urine-serum associations supporting reduced reliance on serial serum draws in select patients. These findings support clinical adoption of quantitative urinary fertility monitoring.
Balachandran S et al., 2026·Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reproductive outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and the influence of material and social deprivation on these outcomes.
This retrospective cohort study included RPL patients seen at a specialized clinic between March 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on care period: pre-pandemic (March 1, 2018-February 29, 2020) and pandemic (March 1, 2020-February 28, 2022). Cumulative probabilities of birth were estimated using the cumulative incidence function within a competing risk framework, treating pregnancy loss as a competing event. Fine and Gray regression models calculated sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) of birth.
544 patients were included in the study, with 255 in the pre-pandemic group and 289 in the pandemic group. Individuals in the pandemic group were less likely to achieve pregnancy than those in the pre-pandemic group (relative risk = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 - 0.66). Among those who conceived, the cumulative probability of live birth was 0.77 in both groups. Relative to individuals residing in high-social deprivation neighborhoods, those living in moderately deprived areas had higher sub-distribution hazards of live birth (adjusted sHR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.10; P = 0.003).
Within specialized RPL care and a universal maternity care system, pregnancy rates were lower during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, among those who conceived, the probability of achieving a live birth remained similar between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
Bouchard TP et al., 2026·Reproductive biomedicine online·Free to read
Does formation of the corpus luteum help to identify the day of ovulation on ultrasound when follicular collapse is missed, and how reliable are sonographers versus a review panel in identifying the day of ovulation on ultrasound? Sonographers in a clinic in Canada performed serial endovaginal ultrasound scans (six to eight per cycle) to identify the day of ovulation in regularly cycling women (n = 40) who were followed for one to five cycles (n = 85). The day of ovulation was identified by: (i) identification of the dominant follicle; (ii) disappearance of the dominant follicle; and (iii) identification and dating of the corpus luteum. The main outcome measures were inter-rater reliability between two sonographers, and Bland-Altman agreement between the supervising sonographer and a panel that reviewed each scan to identify the day of ovulation. Of the 85 menstrual cycles reviewed, two cycles did not have sufficient data to date ovulation, one cycle showed an incidental dermoid cyst, and 11 cycles showed anovulatory patterns. This left a total of 71 cycles (84%) for which intra-rater reliability between two sonographers for identifying the day of ovulation was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, P < 0.0001), and Bland-Altman agreement showed no significant difference in the estimated day of ovulation between the supervising sonographer and the panel (t = -0.28, P = 0.78). Corpus luteum criteria were necessary to help identify the day of ovulation in 14 of 71 cycles (20%). The estimated day of ovulation can be determined reliably on ultrasound by trained sonographers using collapse of the dominant follicle and formation of the corpus luteum based on six to eight scans per cycle.
Yong PJ et al., 2026·Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
To provide health care professionals with an evidence-based approach to the management of endometriosis and its associated symptoms.
Women and gender-diverse individuals affected by endometriosis.
BENEFITS, HARMS, Timely and effective management of endometriosis has the potential to reduce pain, improve fertility and quality of life, and enhance long-term health outcomes. Early intervention may also help mitigate the financial and health system burdens associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment.
Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, Ovid, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from August 2010 through December 2025, using relevant MeSH heading and keywords. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical practice guidelines. Results were limited to English or French language materials. Evidence was supplemented with references from the 2010 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada guideline No. 244.
The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations).
Health care providers involved in the care of individuals with endometriosis.
Early identification and management of endometriosis can significantly improve patient outcomes, reduce long-term health care costs and improve their quality of life.
RECOMMENDATIONS.
Agarwal SK et al., 2019·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology·Free to read
Endometriosis can have a profound impact on women's lives, including associated pain, infertility, decreased quality of life, and interference with daily life, relationships, and livelihood. The first step in alleviating these adverse sequelae is to diagnose the underlying condition. For many women, the journey to endometriosis diagnosis is long and fraught with barriers and misdiagnoses. Inherent challenges include a gold standard based on an invasive surgical procedure (laparoscopy) and diverse symptomatology, contributing to the well-established delay of 4-11 years from first symptom onset to surgical diagnosis. We believe that remedying the diagnostic delay requires increased patient education and timely referral to a women's healthcare provider and a shift in physician approach to the disorder. Endometriosis should be approached as a chronic, systemic, inflammatory, and heterogeneous disease that presents with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or infertility, rather than focusing primarily on surgical findings and pelvic lesions. Using this approach, symptoms, signs, and clinical findings of endometriosis are anticipated to become the main drivers of clinical diagnosis and earlier intervention. Combining these factors into a practical algorithm is expected to simplify endometriosis diagnosis and make the process accessible to more clinicians and patients, culminating in earlier effective management. The time has come to bridge disparities and to minimize delays in endometriosis diagnosis and treatment for the benefit of women worldwide.
Wahl KJ et al., 2021·Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
Endometriosis is an enigmatic, painful, complex disease that affects approximately 1 million people in Canada. The disease can involve multiple organ systems, often resulting in debilitating chronic pain and infertility. Social, medical, geographic, and other factors are implicated in years-long diagnostic delays and may limit access to care. An integrated approach from bench to bedside to community is urgently required. A pan-Canadian collaboration among patients, clinicians and researchers will improve endometriosis awareness, provide best practices, and link research across Canada.
De Corte P et al., 2025·BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·Free full text on PubMed Central
Endometriosis diagnosis reportedly faces delays of up to 10 years. Despite growing awareness and improved guidelines, information on the current status is limited. To systematically assess the published evidence on the status of time to diagnosis in individuals with endometriosis, with respect to the definition of time to diagnosis, geographical location and patient characteristics. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase were searched for publications reporting time to diagnosing endometriosis since 2018. No restrictions to population or comparators were applied. All publications were screened by two independent reviewers. Search results were limited to primary publications of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and observational studies. Case reports, secondary publications and grey literature were excluded. No restrictions were made regarding language, provided that an English title and abstract were available. Publications were assessed with respect to time to diagnosis, diagnostic methods, study type, study country and potential bias. The 17 publications eligible for inclusion in this literature review were all observational studies. The publications reported diagnosis times between 0.3 and 12 years, with variations depending on the definition of time to diagnosis (overall, primary, or clinical), geographical location and characteristics of the included study population. Evidence was of poor to good quality overall. Diagnostic delay is still present, primarily driven by physicians, and this review underscores the need for standardised definitions, increased awareness and targeted diagnostic interventions.
Clinical Guidelines and Standards › Guidelines by Clinical Area › Gynecologic Guidelines · Diagnostics › Ultrasound › Transvaginal Ultrasound · Endometriosis › Diagnosis › Diagnostic Delay
Sukhbir S Singh, Catherine Allaire, Omar Al-Nourhji, Philippa Bridge-Cook, Shauna Duigenan, Jamie Kroft, Madeleine Lemyre, Mathew Leonardi, Sarah Maheux-Lacroix, Jocelyn Wessels, Kate Wahl, Paul J Yong
S Singh, Cathy Allaire, Kate Allaire, C Allaire, O Al-Nourhji, P Bridge-Cook, S Duigenan, J Kroft, M Lemyre, M Leonardi, S Maheux-Lacroix, J Wessels, Catherine Wahl, Katherine Wahl, Kathryn Wahl, K Wahl, P Yong
PMID 38555044 38555044 DOI 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102450 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102450 Singh et al. 2024, Singh 2024
