Mankato Family Medicine Residency, University of Minnesota, Mankato, MN The corresponding author is Robert D. Jeske; [email protected]. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
natural procreative technology live birth rate infertility, NaProTechnology evidence-based review couples infertility, NaProTechnology live birth outcomes effectiveness, Paul McCabe Jeske NaProTechnology evidence-based practice, alternative infertility treatment natural procreative technology success, NaProTechnology clinical evidence live birth achievement, restorative reproductive medicine infertility live birth rate, natural procreative technology systematic review evidence, NaProTechnology fertility treatment outcomes couples, family medicine approach infertility NaProTechnology
DOI 10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374 10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374
Cite this article
Paul, B. J., McCabe, J. C., & Jeske, R. D. (2022). In couples with infertility, is natural procreative technology successful in achieving live birth?. *Evidence-Based Practice*, *25*(1), 25-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374
Paul BJ, McCabe JC, Jeske RD. In couples with infertility, is natural procreative technology successful in achieving live birth?. EBPR. 2022;25(1):25-26. doi:10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374
Paul, Benjamin J., et al. "In couples with infertility, is natural procreative technology successful in achieving live birth?." *Evidence-Based Practice*, vol. 25, no. 1, 2022, pp. 25-26.
Gallo P et al., 2022
Open Access
Revista de Medicina y Ética
La progresiva medicalización de la infertilidad en las últimas tres décadas se corresponde con una creciente difusión de las Tecnologías de Reproducción Asistida (TRA), que han dejado en la somb...
L’auto-osservazione e il follow-up grafico del ciclo mestruale in caso di presunta sterilita, aiutano a diagnosticare e trattare certe alterazioni ginecologiche, al fine di attuare il rapporto sessual...