Evidence-Based Practice, 25(1), 25-26, 2022
In couples with infertility, is natural procreative technology successful in achieving live birth?
Author affiliations
- Minnesota State University, Mankato ROR
Abstract
Mankato Family Medicine Residency, University of Minnesota, Mankato, MN The corresponding author is Robert D. Jeske; [email protected]. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Topics
natural procreative technology live birth rate infertility, NaProTechnology evidence-based review couples infertility, NaProTechnology live birth outcomes effectiveness, Paul McCabe Jeske NaProTechnology evidence-based practice, alternative infertility treatment natural procreative technology success, NaProTechnology clinical evidence live birth achievement, restorative reproductive medicine infertility live birth rate, natural procreative technology systematic review evidence, NaProTechnology fertility treatment outcomes couples, family medicine approach infertility NaProTechnology
DOI 10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374 10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374 Paul et al. 2022, Paul 2022
Cite this article
Paul, B. J., McCabe, J. C., & Jeske, R. D. (2022). In couples with infertility, is natural procreative technology successful in achieving live birth?. Evidence-Based Practice, 25(1), 25-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374
Paul BJ, McCabe JC, Jeske RD. In couples with infertility, is natural procreative technology successful in achieving live birth?. EBPR. 2022;25(1):25-26. doi:10.1097/ebp.0000000000001374
Paul, Benjamin J., et al. "In couples with infertility, is natural procreative technology successful in achieving live birth?." Evidence-Based Practice, vol. 25, no. 1, 2022, pp. 25-26.
Related articles
NaProTechnology · Cumulative Pregnancy Rates
Natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology) for infertility: take-home baby rate and clinical outcomes in a 5-year single-center cohort of 1,310 couples
Sánchez-Méndez JI et al., 2025 · Front Reprod Health · Open Access
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are widely used to address infertility; however, they are costly, associated with medical risks, and often yield suboptimal clinical outcomes. Natural Procreative Technology, also known as NaProTechnology (NPT), provides a systematic and integrative approach to infertility by thoroughly identifying and treating underlying medical conditions to restore the couple's natural fertility potential. Despite its promise, real-world data on NPT effectiveness remain limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the take-home baby rate in a large population of infertile couples treated with NPT and to synthesize findings from previously published studies. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 1,310 infertile couples treated at a specialized fertility clinic in Spain over a 5-year period. Participants presented with primary or secondary infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Clinical data, diagnoses, and outcomes were analyzed, including surgical interventions and treatment duration. The mean age of women and men was 35.0 (SD 4.4) and 36.9 (SD 5.3) years, respectively. Primary infertility was the most common subtype (73.5%), the median infertility duration was 24 months, and prior ART attempts were recorded in 27.5% of couples. Mean number of diagnoses per couple was 2.5 (SD 1.3). The crude take-home baby rate was 35.3% (N = 463). Independent predictors of successful take-home baby included female age, recurrent pregnancy loss as the reason for consultation, duration of infertility, and the presence of endometriosis, hormonal dysfunction, male factor, and endometrial disorders as diagnoses. Considering a median duration of NPT of 10.9 months (range 8.1-17.0), the adjusted cumulative take-home baby rate was 62.1%. Rates varied significantly by female age, with higher success observed in younger women: 83.7% at 18-30 years, 53.3% at 36-40 years, and 24.4% over 40 years. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of dropout assumptions on cumulative pregnancy rates. Nearly one-third of patients underwent surgery, most commonly hysteroscopy and/or laparoscopy. In this cohort, NPT was associated with a notably high take-home baby rate in an infertile population with unfavorable prognostic factors, including advanced maternal age, prolonged duration of infertility, or previous failed attempts at conventional ART procedures.
Effectiveness · Typical and Perfect Use
Pregnancies, intentions, and fertility behaviors during use of the Creighton Model FertilityCare System after initial intention to avoid pregnancy: Results from the Creighton Model effectiveness, intentions, behaviors assessment study
Stanford JB et al., 2025 · PLoS One · Open Access
Knowledge of the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle can be applied to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. Fertility intentions and sexual behaviors during the fertile time may influence whether and when pregnancy occurs. The Creighton Model FertilityCare System (CrMS) is a specific system of fertility appreciation used to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. The objective of this paper is to report intentions, behaviors, and pregnancy rates during use of the CrMS among couples who initially intended to avoid pregnancy.Data and methodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort study conducted in 17 CrMS centers across the USA and Canada, following 296 couples for up to one year after onset of initial use of the CrMS to avoid pregnancy. Baseline data included demographics, motivations, and pregnancy intentions for each partner. Couples contributed 2894 menstrual cycles, most of which had data collected (by questionnaires and daily diary) on cycle-specific pregnancy intentions, days of potential fertility, and fertility behaviors. Pregnancies were prospectively actively ascertained. We found a high concordance (91%) in cycle pregnancy intentions between partners. However, 44% of cycles with strong intentions to avoid pregnancy included intercourse on potentially fertile days or days of undetermined fertility status. Across all sensitivity scenarios, cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to conceive ranged from 88.0% to 89.8%, and cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to avoid ranged from 29.1% to 35.3%. In multivariate analysis, baseline motivations and intentions for pregnancy within 2 years were strongly correlated with the likelihood of pregnancy, more so than cycle intentions. The findings suggest that in some populations using natural family planning, baseline motivations and intentions may be more strongly related to pregnancy rates than cycle intentions. Our findings also highlight essential elements for evaluating correct use, including complete recording of intercourse and its timing.
NaProTechnology · Cumulative Pregnancy Rates
Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility in two family medicine clinics in New England, an observational study
Stanford JB et al., 2021 · BMC Pregnancy Childbirth · Open Access
Restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) seeks to identify and correct underlying causes and factors contributing to infertility and reproductive dysfunction. Many components of RRM are highly suitable for primary care practice. We studied the outcomes amongst couples who received restorative reproductive medicine treatment for infertility in a primary care setting. Two family physicians in Massachusetts trained in a systematic approach to RRM (natural procreative technology, or NaProTechnology) treated couples with infertility. We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes for all couples treated during the years 1989 to 2014. We compared pregnancy and live birth by clinical characteristics using Kaplan-Meier analysis. We employed the Fleming-Harrington weighted Renyi test or the logrank test to compare the cumulative proportion with pregnancy or with live birth. Among 370 couples beginning treatment for infertility, the mean age was 34.8 years, the mean prior time trying to conceive was 2.7 years, and 27% had a prior live birth. The mean number of diagnoses per couple was 4.9. Treatment components included fertility tracking with the Creighton Model FertilityCare System (80%); medications to enhance cervical mucus production (81%), to stimulate ovulation (62%), or to support the luteal phase (75%); and referral to female laparoscopy by a surgeon specializing in endometriosis (46%). The cumulative live birth rate at 2 years was 29% overall; this was significantly higher for women under age 35 (34%), and for women with body mass index < 25 (40%). There were 2 sets of twins and no higher-order multiple gestations. Of the 63 births with data available, 58 (92%) occurred at term. Family physicians can provide a RRM approach for infertility to identify underlying causes and promote healthy term live births. Younger women and women with body mass index < 25 are more likely to have a live birth.
Preconception Care · Preconception Optimization
Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility and recurrent miscarriage in the outpatient gynaecological practice in Ukraine
Horodenchuk Z et al., 2020 · Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio
To assess the outcomes of treatment the couples with infertility or recurrent miscarriage with restorative reproductive approach and to identify predictors of success. It was a retrospective study of 282 married couples, who were included in the program in 2 outpatient gynaecological centers in May 2010 - December 2014. The couples were observed to the end of pregnancy (or pregnancies) or withdrawal from the program. All the couples were taught to track the cycle with the Creighton Model FertilityCare System or the sympto-thermal method, and almost all received additional medical treatment. The main outcome was live birth, the secondary outcomes included conceptions, unsuccessful pregnancies, low birth weight and prematurity. In life-table analysis, the adjusted cumulative proportion of first conceptions for those completing up to 24 months of NPT treatment was 77.7% (crude proportion 47.9%). The adjusted cumulative proportion of live births was 73.6% (117 births, crude proportion 41.5%). Mean time to achieving pregnancy was 8 months. All the births except one were singleton. There were only 3 preterm births. The favorable predictors of live birth were younger age, shorter time of trying for baby, good compliance, pregnancy in history. The unfavorable were hyperprolactinemia, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, male factor. The outcomes of restorative reproductive treatment the couples with infertility or recurrent miscarriage in Ukraine were comparable to those in Ireland and Canada.