Infertility · Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Increased prevalence of insulin resistance in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss

Craig LB, Ke RW, Kutteh WH

Published September 7, 2002 Fertility and Sterility, 78(3), 487-490
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03247-8 PMID 12215322

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether insulin resistance is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

Design

Single center, case-controlled, prospective study.

Setting

University-associated reproductive endocrinology clinical practice.

Patients

Seventy-four nonpregnant, nondiabetic women with RPL. Controls were 74 fertile, nonpregnant, nondiabetic women without RPL who had at least one live infant, and were matched by age, race, and body mass index (BMI).

Interventions

Both groups consented to obtaining fasting insulin and glucose levels.

Main Outcome Measures

Insulin resistance was defined as a fasting insulin level >20 microU/mL or a fasting glucose to insulin ratio of <4.5.

Results

Among the 74 women with RPL, 20 (27.0%) demonstrated insulin resistance, whereas only 7 of 74 (9.5%) of the matched controls were insulin resistant (odds ratio 3.55; 95% confidence interval 1.40-9.01). The RPL and control groups were similar with respect to age, ethnicity, and BMI. The RPL and control groups had similar fasting glucose levels and glucose-to-insulin ratios. However, fasting insulin levels > or =20 microU/mL were statistically different between the two groups (odds ratio 3.92).

Conclusions

Women with RPL have a significantly increased prevalence of insulin resistance when compared with matched fertile controls.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Infertility › Recurrent Pregnancy Loss › Endocrine Causes · Reproductive Endocrinology › Thyroid and Metabolic Function › Insulin and Metabolism · Pregnancy › Preconception Care › Preconception Screening
LaTasha B Craig, Raymond W Ke, William H Kutteh
L Craig, R Ke, Bill Kutteh, Will Kutteh, Billy Kutteh, W Kutteh
PMID 12215322 12215322 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03247-8 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03247-8 Craig et al. 2002, Craig 2002