Ethics and Policy · Reproductive Ethics

'Innate Nature' and 'Complete Nature': The Catholic Natural Family Planning Program and the Competition of Natural Methods in Mid-1970s Korea

Park S

Published May 19, 2020 Ui Sahak, 29(1), 81-120
DOI 10.13081/kjmh.2020.29.81 PMID 32418977 PMC PMC10556349
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Korean Catholic bishops approved only the Billings Method

A 2020 history of church and medical journals finds that Korea's Catholic bishops approved only the Billings Method in 1976. A group of gynecologists had proposed a pill to induce ovulation. A Philippine adviser likened it to the birth control pill, and later bishops' documents omitted it.

Key Findings

  • In spring 1973, a research committee centered on a St. Mary's Hospital gynecologist told the bishops' conference it would develop Ovulation Regulation, which uses an estrogen-progesterone pill to induce ovulation.
  • Its supporters argued that nature means original completeness, so a drug that restored the natural cycle was a justified intervention. Billings Method supporters defined nature as the absence of human intervention.
  • The Philippine bishops' medical adviser concluded Ovulation Regulation resembled an oral contraceptive, because the drugs changed cervical mucus and at times suppressed ovulation itself.
  • On 25 June 1976, the Korean bishops' pastoral letter named the Billings Method as the natural method. No bishops' document after 1973 mentioned Ovulation Regulation.
  • A Chuncheon diocese bishop reported teaching about 2,000 believing and about 2,000 non-believing couples. The paper says this experience was not rigorously controlled.

Interpretation

The paper is a historical analysis of church periodicals, hospital association journals and medical articles. It traces how Korean church leaders came to choose one method, and it reports no pregnancy rates for either method. The couple counts come from a bishop's own report. The author argues that the meaning of nature settled the debate, and that technical merit came up only afterward. The findings describe Catholic family planning in 1970s Korea and cover no other setting.

RRM Context

The Billings Method is a fertility awareness-based method. Users track cervical mucus to find the fertile window. Restorative reproductive medicine uses cycle charting and works with ovulation. The Korean debate shows an early split between methods that watch the cycle and drugs that set its timing.

Abstract

This article reviews the competition of two natural family planning methods in the mid-1970s when the Catholic Natural Family Planning program was underway in Korea. The Catholic Church, emphasizing the natural law, has recommended Natural Family Planning (NFP), a method of regulating childbirth by abstinence during the fertile period, since the mid-twentieth century. However, a group of gynecologists working at St. Mary's Hospital, a Catholic general hospital in Korea, questioned the utility of NFP. As an alternative, they proposed the method of Ovulation Regulation (OR), which regulates the menstrual cycle by inducing ovulation with steroids agents. This seemed to be no different than contraception with oral contraceptives disapproved of by the Catholic Church, but many doctors who advocated OR thought that this could be a new 'natural' family planning method to replace NFP. What is noteworthy here is the fact that not only NFP advocates, but also OR advocates attempted to justify their methods based on the authority of the 'nature.' In the debate over natural family planning methods, nature's legitimacy was given premise, not the object of doubt. Rather, the issue was the definition of nature. First, 'nature' in NFP signifies 'innate nature,' which excludes human intervention. According to this point of view, OR with steroids agents could not be natural. On the contrary, a group of doctors who advocated OR considered nature 'primal completeness.' If the natural order of the menstrual cycle could be restored, the artificial intervention of the administration of steroids was not a problem. Thus, both groups defended their arguments by redefining nature, rather than raising an issue of nature itself. The competition between 'innate nature' and 'complete nature,' a proxy war between NFP and OR, resulted in the victory of the former as the meaning of nature became fixed. Advocates of NFP pointed out that OR inhibits other physiological functions in the process of inducing ovulation, suggesting that the idea of 'complete nature' could never be achieved. The meaning of nature could no longer be controversial. Since the intervention was unnatural, nature meant innateness, the absence of intervention. Accordingly, the Catholic Bishops of Korea approved the Billings Method, a kind of the NFP, as the official family planning method, and gynecologists at St. Mary's Hospital of Korea also focused on the development and supplementation of the Billings Method. In short, the debate over the methods of natural family planning in mid1970s Korea was a clash of 'innate nature' and 'complete nature.' As a result, this confirmed the limitations of medical practice and reconfirmed the power of magisterium, the church's authority over medical practice.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Ethics and Policy › Reproductive Ethics › Conscience Protections
Sunjune Park
S Park
PMID 32418977 32418977 DOI 10.13081/kjmh.2020.29.81 10.13081/kjmh.2020.29.81 Park et al. 2020, Park 2020

Cite this article

Park, S. (2020). 'Innate Nature' and 'Complete Nature': The Catholic Natural Family Planning Program and the Competition of Natural Methods in Mid-1970s Korea. Ui sahak, 29(1), 81-120. https://doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2020.29.81