To assess the intratubal pressure (ITP) and patency status of the fallopian tubes before and after transcervical catheterization of the fallopian tubes (TCFT).
Design
Prospective procedural assessment.
Setting
Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction.
PATIENT(S): Two hundred thirty-four women with either primary or secondary infertility.
INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent selective hysterosalpingography and, in some cases, TCFT with measurement of the ITP before and after the procedure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The ITP before and after TCFT.
RESULT(S): The mean (+/-SD) ITP in freely patent tubes was 0.53 +/- 0.06 atm, that in partially obstructed tubes was 1.23 +/- 0.52 atm, and that in completely obstructed tubes was 2.79 +/- 1.40 atm. After TCFT, the mean (+/-SD) ITP in partially obstructed tubes decreased to 0.64 +/- 0.31 atm and that in completely obstructed tubes decreased to 1.86 +/- 1.35 atm. The ITP was normalized in 76% of partially obstructed tubes and in 29.5% of completely obstructed tubes. In all cases of complete obstruction in which surgical correction was attempted, organic pathology was identified.
CONCLUSION(S): The procedure described is a safe and easy means of obtaining reliable and significant information on the status of the proximal fallopian tube.
PMID 10428171 10428171 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00165-x 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00165-x Hilgers et al. 1999, Hilgers 1999
Cite this article
Hilgers, T. W., & Yeung, P. (1999). Intratubal pressure before and after transcervical catheterization of the fallopian tubes. Fertility and sterility, 72(1), 174-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00165-x
Hilgers TW, Yeung P. Intratubal pressure before and after transcervical catheterization of the fallopian tubes. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(1):174-178. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00165-x
Hilgers, T. W., and P. Yeung. "Intratubal pressure before and after transcervical catheterization of the fallopian tubes." Fertility and sterility, vol. 72, no. 1, 1999, pp. 174-178.
To determine whether the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) could be improved if routine spot films were replaced by an on-line recorded gynecoradiologic study.
Medical school-affiliated private infertility center.
In 1992, a review of 152 infertile women with infertility who demonstrated a normal HSG, by standard criteria of spot film evaluation, in 117 (77%). They were further investigated by gynecoradiologic study if the HSG revealed asymmetrical tubal filling, an increased perfusion pressure, and/or evidence for abnormal tubal spill. In 1993, 47 women with normal HSG by spot film criteria underwent bilateral selective salpingography and were subdivided into those with normal (group I, n = 23) and abnormal (group II, n = 24) tubal perfusion pressures. Patients in both study groups then were treated for their infertility independently of pressure perfusion measurements.
Clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) over the ensuing 6 to 10 months. Among 117 women with apparently normal spot film HSG, 64 (55%) demonstrated asymmetrical tubal filling, 32 (27%) demonstrated abnormal spillage into the peritoneal cavity, and 55 (47%) demonstrated abnormally elevated injection pressures. Among 98 women who underwent bilateral selective salpingography, 43 (44%) demonstrated bilaterally normal tubal perfusion pressures and 55 (56%) showed an abnormally elevated pressure in at least one oviduct. Of 47 women that were followed prospectively in 1993, patients with normal perfusion pressure (group I) demonstrated a significantly higher PR than women with elevated tubal pressure (group II) from 2 months and on after the procedure. Routine spot film HSG is of limited value in assessing tubal status beyond the determination of tubal patency. Especially with regard to fertility potential, HSG should be replaced by gynecoradiologic study.
Evaluation of selective salpingography for diagnosis and treatment of tubal injection failure during hysterosalpingography (HSG). Prospective study. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, University of Genoa (Italy)--tertiary care. One hundred eighty infertile women with unilateral or bilateral proximal tubal injection failure during HSG were submitted to the procedure. Under fluoroscopy, a 4.5-F nylon catheter (3-F tip) was inserted into the ostium with or without the aid of a J-shaped, coaxial, angiographic guide wire, and 2 to 3 mL of contrast medium were injected. The procedure lasts 20 to 30 sec/tube. Of 155 tubal ostia, 145 (94.2%) were catheterized. Of the 146 catheterized tubes, 110 (75%) were rendered patent. Of the others, 21 (14.3%) presented hydrosalpinx or distal obstructions, and isthmic obstruction was present in 5 (3.4%). Patency of at least one tube was achieved in 82 (81.2%) of the 101 catheterized women; 8 conceived spontaneously and 11 after gamete intrafallopian transfer to the recanalized tube. During HSG, selective salpinography can be performed when proximal injection failure is observed to determine its cause or to restore patency.
Pregnancy rates among infertile women have been reported to increase after hysterosalpingography, but it is unclear whether the type of contrast medium used (oil-based or water-soluble contrast) influences this potential therapeutic effect. We performed a multicenter, randomized trial in 27 hospitals in the Netherlands in which infertile women who were undergoing hysterosalpingography were randomly assigned to undergo this procedure with the use of oil-based or water-based contrast. Subsequently, couples received expectant management or the women underwent intrauterine insemination. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy within 6 months after randomization. Outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. A total of 1119 women were randomly assigned to hysterosalpingography with oil contrast (557 women) or water contrast (562 women). A total of 220 of 554 women in the oil group (39.7%) and 161 of 554 women in the water group (29.1%) had an ongoing pregnancy (rate ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 1.61; P<0.001), and 214 of 552 women in the oil group (38.8%) and 155 of 552 women in the water group (28.1%) had live births (rate ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.64; P<0.001). Rates of adverse events were low and similar in the two groups. Rates of ongoing pregnancy and live births were higher among women who underwent hysterosalpingography with oil contrast than among women who underwent this procedure with water contrast. (Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR3270 .).
Use of selective salpingography (SS) and fallopian tube catheterization (TC) has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of proximal tubal infertility. To evaluate results of women treated for proximal tubal obstruction by selective salpingography and tubal catherization. Selective salpingography was performed in women with proximal bilateral tubal obstructions. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 12 months. twelve patients had been shown to have bilateral proximal obstruction of the fallopian tube. After SS/TC, patency was achieved in 8 cases. Spontaneous conceptions occurred in 4 women. SS and TC should be used more widely because it is simple and effective in case of proximal tubal blockage.