Billings, J. J., & Bennett, L. A. (1978). Quality of cervical mucus and Huhner's test. British Medical Journal, 2(6137), 640. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6137.640
Billings JJ, Bennett LA. Quality of cervical mucus and Huhner's test. Br Med J. 1978;2(6137):640. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.6137.640
Billings, J. J., and L. A. Bennett. "Quality of cervical mucus and Huhner's test." British Medical Journal, vol. 2, no. 6137, 1978, pp. 640.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
Open access
Free to read
No reuse license
Open Access
Free full text on PubMed Central (PMC1607518)
Author affiliations
1 institution
St Vincent's HospitalMelbourne
RRM Academy Synopsis
Postcoital Test Results Need Cervical Mucus Quality, Letter Argues
This is a 1978 letter to a medical journal. The letter does not study patients directly. The writers challenge another paper's reading of a fertility test. They argue a postcoital sperm count cannot be interpreted without the state of the cervical mucus that day.
Key Findings
Citing earlier research, the authors note sperm begin penetrating cervical mucus about five to six days before ovulation, penetrate best at ovulation, and show inhibited penetration one or two days after ovulation.
Citing Odeblad's mucus classification, the authors write that most mucus specimens with higher sperm numbers and more motile sperm were probably type E, and that some were very possibly type G.
The authors note it is not certain whether a blood-tinged mucus sample is preovulatory or premenstrual without knowing the exact day of ovulation.
The letter concludes that reading a postcoital test by sperm count and motility alone, without the mucus's own quality that day, risks a wrong interpretation.
Interpretation
This is a letter to the editor. The letter presents no data-based study. The authors, linked to an Australian fertility research group, critique another paper's reading of the postcoital test. They cite earlier mucus research by other scientists to build their case. The authors offer no new patient data, no sample size, and no statistical test of their own. The argument's strength rests entirely on the cited studies. The piece reads as scientific opinion and a historical record of a 1978 debate over cervical mucus and fertility testing. The letter offers no new evidence.
RRM Context
One author, John Billings, developed the Billings Ovulation Method. The method is a fertility awareness approach built on tracking cervical mucus changes. This 1978 letter shows early FABM researchers pushing back on a test that judged fertility by sperm count alone. They argued mucus quality carries its own diagnostic information. Modern restorative reproductive medicine still treats the cervical mucus pattern as a real diagnostic marker worth close attention.
Our editorial summary of this paper, not the article's abstract.
Abstract not indexed.
By this author
Comparative Studies · Contraception Versus Fertility Awareness