General Gynecology Breast Health

Recent oral contraceptive use by formulation and breast cancer risk among women 20 to 49 years of age

Beaber EF, Buist DS, Barlow WE, Malone KE, Reed SD, Li CI

Published August 2014 Cancer Research, 74(15), 4078-4089
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3400 PMID 25085875 PMC PMC4154499

RRM Academy Synopsis

Recent Birth Control Pill Use Linked to Higher Breast Cancer Risk

Women who filled a birth control pill prescription in the past year had a 50 percent higher breast cancer risk than women with no recent use, a case-control study of 1,102 women with breast cancer and 21,952 matched controls found. Risk may vary by pill type and was higher for hormone-receptor-positive tumors.

Key Findings

  • Recent pill use (within the past year) was linked to a higher breast cancer risk than past or no use (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.9) among 1,102 cases and 21,952 matched controls.
  • Risk was higher for hormone-receptor-positive tumors (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.1) than receptor-negative tumors (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.8), though the gap was not statistically significant (p=0.15).
  • High-dose-estrogen and ethynodiol diacetate pills (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.2; OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-4.7) showed particularly elevated risk; low-dose pills showed no added risk (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.7).
  • One triphasic formulation carried the greatest risk of any studied (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9-5.1), the only one with a risk that differed significantly from other formulations (heterogeneity p=0.004).
  • Risk rose with the number of pills filled in the prior year, for both overall and hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (trend p<0.001 for both).

Interpretation

This case-control study of health plan members ages 20 to 49 drew on two decades of pharmacy records from one U.S. health plan, which reduces the recall bias common in older birth control studies. The authors note that some formulation estimates rest on few exposed cases and could reflect chance, given how many comparisons were run. Checked factors available for a subset of women, including family history and body weight, did not meaningfully change the main result.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine identifies and treats underlying causes. This study adds one more risk to weigh when women and clinicians choose among hormonal contraceptives. Fertility awareness-based methods track a woman's own cycle signs, with no drug that stops ovulation. No such cancer risk shows up in that research base. Pharmacy records like these give a firmer base than memory for future hormone studies that matter to RRM and FABM care.

Abstract

Previous studies of oral contraceptives and breast cancer indicate that recent use slightly increases risk, but most studies relied on self-reported use and did not examine contemporary oral contraceptive formulations. This nested case-control study was among female enrollees in a large U.S. integrated health care delivery system. Cases were 1,102 women ages 20 to 49 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1990 to 2009. Controls were randomly sampled from enrollment records (n = 21,952) and matched to cases on age, year, enrollment length, and medical chart availability. Detailed oral contraceptive use information was ascertained from electronic pharmacy records and analyzed using conditional logistic regression, ORs, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Recent oral contraceptive use (within the prior year) was associated with an increased breast cancer risk (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9) relative to never or former OC use. The association was stronger for estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+); OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1) than estrogen receptor-negative (ER(-)) disease (OR, 1.2, 95% CI, 0.8-1.8), although not statistically significantly different (P = 0.15). Recent use of oral contraceptives involving high-dose estrogen (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.2), ethynodiol diacetate (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.7), or triphasic dosing with an average of 0.75 mg of norethindrone (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.1; Pheterogeneity compared with using other oral contraceptives = 0.004) was associated with particularly elevated risks, whereas other types, including low-dose estrogen oral contraceptives, were not (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.7). Our results suggest that recent use of contemporary oral contraceptives is associated with an increased breast cancer risk, which may vary by formulation. If confirmed, consideration of the breast cancer risk associated with different oral contraceptive types could impact discussions weighing recognized health benefits and potential risks.

Topics

By this author

Related research

General Gynecology › Breast Health › Breast Cancer Risk · Contraception › Oral Contraceptives › Cancer Risk
Elisabeth F Beaber, Diana S M Buist, William E Barlow, Kathleen E Malone, Susan D Reed, Christopher I Li
E Beaber, D Buist, Bill Barlow, Will Barlow, Billy Barlow, W Barlow, K Malone, Sue Reed, S Reed, Chris Li, C Li
PMID 25085875 25085875 DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3400 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3400 Beaber et al. 2014, Beaber 2014