Menstrual Cycle Cycle Physiology

The normal variabilities of the menstrual cycle

Cole LA, Ladner DG, Byrn FW

Published February 2009 Fertility and sterility
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.073 PMID 18433748

Abstract

Objective

To address conflicts in the normal variabilities of the menstrual cycle using the newest generation test methods and to establish normal ranges for use in clinical practice.

Design

Daily urine samples were collected from 167 women eager to achieve pregnancy. Samples were tested prospectively for LH and total hCG. A total of 458 nongestational and 111 gestational menstrual cycles were evaluated.

Setting

Division of Women's Health Research, University of New Mexico.

Patients

One hundred sixty-seven women desiring pregnancy.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Levels of hCG and LH.

Results

Menstrual cycles were 27.7 +/- 2.4 days in length. The LH peak indicated the onset of the presumed ovulatory window, which occurs at 14.7 +/- 2.4 days. Implantation (first day of sensitive detection of hCG) occurred in gestational menstrual cycles at 24.6 +/- 3.1 days, or 4.3 +/- 2.2 days before missing the expected onset of menses.

Conclusions

Our data confirm epidemiological studies on menstrual cycle length and variability and hormonal studies on timing of the ovulatory window and its variability. They dispute, however, the published data on the timing and variance of implantation. As shown, implantation is limited to a 10-day interval culminating in the day of the expected onset of menses. Reference range data provide guidelines for differentiating normal and problem menstrual cycles.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Physiology › Cycle Variability · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovulation Physiology › Follicular Development · Diagnostics › Cycle Biomarkers › Ovulation Detection
Laurence A Cole, Donald G Ladner, Francis W Byrn
Larry Cole, L Cole, Don Ladner, D Ladner, F Byrn
PMID 18433748 18433748 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.073 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.073 Cole et al. 2009, Cole 2009