Fertility Awareness · Biomarkers

Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy

Stanford JB, Smith KR, Dunson DB

Published June 12, 2003 Obstetrics and Gynecology, 101(6), 1285-1293
DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00358-2 PMID 12798538
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Vulvar mucus peak day marks the highest chance of pregnancy

A cohort study of Creighton Model charts found the mucus peak day carried the highest chance of pregnancy: 38 out of 100 for couples with normal fertility, 14 out of 100 for couples having trouble conceiving. The study drew on 426 couples who charted daily.

Key Findings

  • Normally fertile couples: 309 couples, 1681 cycles, 81 conceptions. Couples with subfertility: 117 couples, 373 cycles, 30 conceptions.
  • The peak day of vulvar mucus observation had the top day-specific probability of pregnancy: .38 in normally fertile couples, .14 in subfertile couples.
  • Pregnancy probability passed .05 from 3 days before to 2 days after the peak (normally fertile), and from 1 day before to 1 day after (subfertile).
  • Mucus cycle score correlated with the cycle-specific probability of conception in normally fertile couples but not in subfertile couples.

Interpretation

The authors pulled existing charts from six centers. Couples were grouped by what they said they intended at entry. The authors say the normally fertile group likely held some couples with undetected subfertility. The study had no independent marker of ovulation. Charts were missing for 46% of eligible normally fertile couples and 43% of subfertile couples. The authors judge this probably favored couples who conceived, which might bias probabilities upward. The sample was predominantly white (93%) and Catholic (71%). Age and recent oral contraceptive use were not significant in the models, and the sample held few younger women and few cycles soon after stopping oral contraceptives.

RRM Context

Earlier day-specific studies left out couples with subfertility. They timed intercourse against basal body temperature or urinary hormones. This Creighton Model cohort charted mucus in couples trying to conceive and reported a fertile window for them. Cycle-charting-informed care starts from daily observation of the woman's own cycle. The authors call for more study of vulvar mucus observation in infertility.

Abstract

Objective

To assess the day-specific and cycle-specific probabilities of conception leading to clinical pregnancy, in relation to the timing of intercourse and vulvar mucus observations.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of women beginning use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System in Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, and California. Data were abstracted from Creighton Model Fertility Care System records, including women's daily standardized vulvar observations of cervical mucus discharge, days of intercourse, and clinically evident pregnancy (conception). Established statistical models were used to estimate day-specific probabilities of conception.

Results

Data were analyzed from 1681 cycles with 81 conceptions from 309 normally fertile couples (initially seeking to avoid pregnancy) and from 373 cycles with 30 conceptions from 117 subfertile couples (who were initially trying to achieve pregnancy). The highest probability of pregnancy occurred on the peak day of vulvar mucus observation (.38 for normally fertile couples and.14 for subfertile couples). The probability of pregnancy was greater than.05 for normally fertile couples from 3 days before to 2 days after the peak, and for subfertile couples from 1 day before to 1 day after the peak. The cycle-specific probability of conception correlated with the quality of mucus discharge in normally fertile couples but not in subfertile couples.

Conclusion

Standardized vulvar observations of vaginal mucus discharge identify the days with the greatest likelihood of conception from intercourse in normal fertility and subfertility and provide an indicator of the overall potential for conception in a given menstrual cycle in normal fertility.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Fertility Awareness › Biomarkers › Cervical Mucus · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Cervical Mucus · Restorative Reproductive Medicine › Reading the Chart › Mucus Pattern Interpretation
David B Dunson, Ken R Smith, Joseph B Stanford
Dave Dunson, D Dunson, Kenneth Smith, K Smith, Joe Stanford, Joey Stanford, J Stanford
PMID 12798538 12798538 DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00358-2 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00358-2 Stanford et al. 2003, Stanford 2003

Cite this article

Stanford, J. B., Smith, K. R., & Dunson, D. B. (2003). Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology, 101(6), 1285-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00358-2