Bone Health Bone Mineral Density

Change in bone mineral density among adolescent women using and discontinuing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception

Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Ott SM

Published February 2005 Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 159(2), 139-44
DOI 10.1001/archpedi.159.2.139 PMID 15699307

Abstract

Background

Several studies report an association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraception and decreased bone mineral density. Adolescents, who are still gaining bone, may be particularly affected, but there has been little study of the association in adolescent users and none following discontinuation.

Objective

To evaluate bone mineral density changes in adolescents using and discontinuing use of DMPA contraception.

Design

A population-based prospective cohort study.

Participants

One hundred seventy adolescent women, aged 14 to 18 years; 80 baseline DMPA users and 90 age-similar, unexposed comparison women. Sixty-one participants discontinued DMPA use during follow-up.

Main Outcome Measures

Bone mineral density, measured every 6 months for 24 to 36 months at the hip, spine, and whole body, comparing mean bone mineral density changes in DMPA users and discontinuers with nonusers.

Results

Among DMPA users, bone mineral density declined significantly relative to nonusers at the hip and spine but not the whole body. Annualized mean percentage changes, adjusted for covariates, were hip, -1.81% vs -0.19%; P<.001; spine, -0.97% vs 1.32%; P<.001, and whole body, 0.73% vs 0.88%; P = .78 for DMPA users vs nonusers, respectively. New users lost bone mineral density more rapidly than prevalent users. Discontinuers experienced significantly increased bone mineral density relative to nonusers at all anatomical sites; annualized mean percentage changes were hip, 1.34% vs -0.19%; P = .004; spine, 2.86% vs 1.32%; P = .004; and whole body, 3.56% vs 0.88%; P<.001.

Conclusions

Use of DMPA contraception in adolescents was associated with significant continuous losses of bone mineral density at the hip and spine. However, significant gains postdiscontinuation provide evidence that the loss of bone mass is apparently reversed.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Bone Health › Bone Mineral Density › Peak Bone Mass · Contraception › Adverse Effects › Bone Density Effects · Therapeutics › Hormonal Agents › Progesterone and Progestins
Delia Scholes, Andrea Z LaCroix, Laura E Ichikawa, William E Barlow, Susan M Ott
D Scholes, A LaCroix, L Ichikawa, Bill Barlow, Will Barlow, Billy Barlow, W Barlow, Sue Ott, S Ott
PMID 15699307 15699307 DOI 10.1001/archpedi.159.2.139 10.1001/archpedi.159.2.139 Scholes et al. 2005, Scholes 2005