Bone loss occurs in young women who experience amenorrhea or ovulatory disturbances. The purpose of this study was to determine whether bone loss could be prevented by simulating a more normal hormonal pattern, using treatment with cyclic medroxyprogesterone, with or without calcium supplementation, in physically active women with disturbed menstruation.
Design
This study was a 1-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Women who were stratified by menstrual cycle disturbance were randomized into four groups. The outcome variable was the change in spinal bone density measured by dual energy techniques.
Setting
A large metropolitan area.
Participants
Sixty-one healthy, normal-weight physically active premenopausal women aged 21 to 45 years who experienced amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, anovulation, or short luteal phase cycles completed the study.
Intervention
Therapies were cyclic medroxyprogesterone (10 mg/day for 10 days per month) and calcium carbonate (1,000 mg/day of calcium) in four groups: (A) (n = 16) cyclic medroxyprogesterone plus calcium carbonate; (B) (n = 16) cyclic medroxyprogesterone with calcium placebo; (C) (n = 15) placebo medroxyprogesterone with active calcium; or (D) (n = 14) both medroxyprogesterone and calcium placebos.
Results
The initial bone density (mean = 1.12 g/cm2) did not differ by group (P = 0.85). The 1-year bone density change was strongly related to treatment with medroxyprogesterone (P = 0.0001) and weakly to calcium (P = 0.072) treatment. Bone density increased significantly (+1.7% +/- 0.5%, +/- SEM, P = 0.004) in the medroxyprogesterone-treated groups (A and B), did not change in the calcium-treated group (C) (-0.7% +/- 0.6%, P = 0.28), and decreased on both placebos (D) (-2.0% +/- 0.6%, P = 0.005).
Conclusions
Cyclic medroxyprogesterone increased spinal bone density in physically active women experiencing amenorrhea or ovulatory disturbances. POTENTIAL
Clinical Significance
Amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, anovulation, and short luteal phase cycles are common in premenopausal women and associated with spinal bone loss occurring at a stage of life when bone density would normally be stable or increasing. This controlled trial shows a significant gain in bone in women in the cyclic medroxyprogesterone intervention group, whereas those subjects in the placebo group lost bone. Calcium supplementation appeared to be helpful but did not reach statistical significance. The implications of these findings for the prevention of osteoporosis warrant further investigation.
Prior JC progesterone bone density premenopausal women, cyclic medroxyprogesterone spinal bone density randomized controlled trial, menstrual cycle disturbances bone loss treatment progesterone, anovulation short luteal phase bone density loss, amenorrhea oligomenorrhea progesterone supplementation bone preservation, calcium supplementation vs progesterone bone density premenopausal, ovulatory disturbances physically active women bone loss prevention, medroxyprogesterone 10mg cyclic treatment osteoporosis prevention, luteal phase deficiency bone density premenopausal women, double blind placebo controlled trial progesterone bone, subclinical ovulatory disturbances spinal bone mineral density
PMID 8017450 8017450 DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90092-2 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90092-2 Prior et al. 1994, Prior 1994
Cite this article
Prior, J. C., Vigna, Y. M., Barr, S. I., Rexworthy, C., & Lentle, B. C. (1994). Cyclic medroxyprogesterone treatment increases bone density: a controlled trial in active women with menstrual cycle disturbances. The American journal of medicine, 96(6), 521-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(94)90092-2
Prior JC, Vigna YM, Barr SI, Rexworthy C, Lentle BC. Cyclic medroxyprogesterone treatment increases bone density: a controlled trial in active women with menstrual cycle disturbances. Am J Med. 1994;96(6):521-530. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(94)90092-2
Prior, J. C., et al. "Cyclic medroxyprogesterone treatment increases bone density: a controlled trial in active women with menstrual cycle disturbances." The American journal of medicine, vol. 96, no. 6, 1994, pp. 521-530.
Yang Y et al., 2019·Journal of the Endocrine Society·
Open Access
Sclerostin is an osteocyte-produced glycoprotein that inhibits the WNT/β-catenin pathway essential for bone formation. Sclerostin was postulated to relate to normal bone metabolism in 2001; we still have an incomplete understanding of its regulation. Estradiol, a bone antiresorptive ovarian steroid, inhibits sclerostin. Estrogen and progesterone act together in menstrual cycles and bone remodelling with progesterone exerting an anabolic effect. We hypothesized a relationship between progesterone and sclerostin because progesterone and estrogen are “partner” hormones in most tissues, and because progesterone and sclerostin modulate bone formation in opposite directions. Two observational menstrual cycle studies have reported sclerostin levels; neither documented changes across cycles nor in luteal phases during which progesterone levels are high(1)(,2). Some reports have also shown positive correlations between sclerostin and age and BMI. In this study, sclerostin was measured using an assay (MSD) of high sensitivity (LOD ± 1pg/mL), broad detection range (1-10 000 pg/mL), and intra/inter-assay precisions of 6% and 10% respectively(3). We collected fasting serum during a 3-month double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 300 mg oral micronized progesterone vs placebo in symptomatic menopausal women; progesterone significantly decreased hot flushes/night sweats (vasomotor symptoms, VMS)(4). Statistical analysis showed sclerostin was not related to the 28-day baseline VMS Score (r=.18, p=.22). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate sclerostin vs baseline data and ANCOVA to analyze RCT results (alpha=0.05 significant, [SD]). The study’s purpose was to determine if sclerostin levels changed during a 3-month RCT of progesterone for VMS in healthy menopausal women(3). The primary outcome was sclerostin level in the 3(rd) month adjusted for baseline and randomization. Results showed the 52 participating women had a mean age of 55.2 (4.6) years, height 1.60 (0.07) m, weight 66.4 (8.6) kg, BMI 24.9 (2.9) kg/m(2) and were primarily Caucasian (91.2%). Baseline variables did not correlate with the baseline mean serum sclerostin level of 27.9 (10.2) pmol/L. Sclerostin had no statistically significant relationship with progesterone or placebo therapy during this RCT; mean changes were -1.07 and -2.60 pmol/L respectively. These data are the first evidence that progesterone neither increases nor decreases serum sclerostin levels. These data fit with the lack of menstrual cycle changes in sclerostin levels(1)(,2). That sclerostin did not correlate with age and BMI in this RCT is likely due to their low trial variance. A limitation of this study is the small sample size. However, it has considerable strength in its RCT design that can document causation. (1)Cidem M Gyn Obstetric Invest. 2012; (2)Liakou CG Endocrine 2016; (3)Van Lierop AH J Bone Miner Res 2011; (4)Hitchcock CL Menopause 2012.
Chiarella SE et al., 2023·The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by diverse cutaneous manifestations, bronchospasm, and/or anaphylaxis. Possible triggers include ovarian progesterone and exogenous progestogens. The timing of symptoms is critical to diagnose PH: during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle for the endogenous form and after exposure to progestins for exogenous PH. Diagnostic modalities such as progesterone skin testing have low sensitivity and specificity for PH. When exogenous PH is suspected, the allergist should consider a progestogen challenge. Treatment strategies should be tailored for each patient, including symptom-directed therapies, ovulation suppression, and progesterone desensitization. Future studies should explore the mechanisms of PH, validation of diagnostic criteria, and standardization of treatment strategies.
This study tested progesterone for perimenopausal hot flush ± night sweat (vasomotor symptom, VMS) treatment. It was a double-blind, randomized trial of 300 mg oral micronized progesterone@bedtime versus placebo for 3-months (m) after a 1-m untreated baseline during 2012/1-2017/4. We randomized untreated, non-depressed, screenand baseline-eligible by VMS, perimenopausal women (with flow within 1-year), ages 35-58 (n = 189). Participants aged 50 (± SD = 4.6) were mostly White, educated, minimally overweight with 63% in late perimenopause; 93% participated remotely. The 1° outcome was 3rd-m VMS Score difference. Participants recorded VMS number and intensity (0-4 scale)/24 h on a VMS Calendar. Randomization required VMS (intensity 2-4/4) of sufficient frequency and/or ≥ 2/week night sweat awakenings. Baseline total VMS Score (SD) was 12.2 (11.3) without assignment difference. Third-m VMS Score did not differ by therapy (Rate Difference - 1.51). However, the 95% CI [- 3.97, 0.95] P = 0.222, did not exclude 3, a minimal clinically important difference. Women perceived progesterone caused decreased night sweats (P = 0.023) and improved sleep quality (P = 0.005); it decreased perimenopause-related life interference (P = 0.017) without increased depression. No serious adverse events occurred. Perimenopausal night sweats ± hot flushes are variable; this RCT was underpowered but could not exclude a minimal clinically important VMS benefit. Perceived night sweats and sleep quality significantly improved.