Effects of menstrual cycle phase on athletic performance

C M Lebrun; Donald C McKenzie; Jerilynn C Prior; J E Taunton

doi:10.1249/00005768-199503000-00022

Reproductive Endocrinology · Ovarian Hormones

Effects of menstrual cycle phase on athletic performance

Lebrun CM, McKenzie DC, Prior JC, Taunton JE

Published March 1995 Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 27(3), 437-444

DOI 10.1249/00005768-199503000-00022

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of menstrual cycle phase on four selected indices of athletic performance: aerobic capacity, anaerobic capacity, isokinetic strength, and high intensity endurance. Sixteen eumenorrheic women (VO2max > or = 50 ml.kg-1.min-1) were tested during the early follicular (F) and midluteal (L) phases of the menstrual cycle. Cycle phases were confirmed by serum estradiol and progesterone assays. No significant differences were observed between F and L tests in weight, percent body fat, sum of skinfolds, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, maximum heart rate, maximum minute ventilation, maximum respiratory exchange ratio, anaerobic performance, endurance time to fatigue (at 90% of VO2max), or isokinetic strength of knee flexion and extension. Both absolute and relative VO2max, however, were slightly lower in L than in F (F = 3.19 +/- 0.09.min-1, L = 3.13 +/- 0.08.min-1, P = 0.04; and F = 53.7 +/- 0.9 ml.kg-1.min-1, L = 52.8 +/- 0.8 ml.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.06). These results suggest that the cyclic increases in endogenous female steroid hormones of an ovulatory menstrual cycle may have a slight, deleterious influence on aerobic capacity, with potential implications for individual athletes. Nevertheless, the cycle phase did not impact significantly on the majority of the other performance tests and cardiorespiratory variables measured in this study.

Topics

By this author

Luteal Phase · Luteal Phase Deficiency

The influence of the menstrual cycle on muscle injuries - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guthardt Y et al., 2026 Sci Rep Free full text on PubMed Central

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between menstrual cycle phases and the incidence of muscle injuries in female team sport athletes, following PRISMA 2020 and PERSiST guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus from inception to mid-January 2024. Studies were included if they examined female team sport athletes of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles and compared the occurrence of muscle injuries across at least two menstrual phases. Studies involving hormonal contraceptive use, medications affecting the menstrual cycle or musculoskeletal system, or menstrual dysfunction were excluded. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 318 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled Risk Ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.86, p = 0.46) for injury risk between the luteal and follicular phases, suggesting no statistically significant association. However, the certainty of the cumulative evidence was rated as very low due to methodological limitations, including inconsistent phase classifications and reliance on imprecise methods for identifying menstrual phases. Consequently, no practical or clinical recommendations can be made at this time. Future research employing standardised, physiologically accurate methods for classifying and detecting menstrual cycle phases is necessary to better understand the potential links between hormonal fluctuations and injury risk.

Breast Health · Benign Breast Conditions

MON-154 Breast areolar diameter in healthy menstruating women—a single cycle cross-sectional study of associations with body size and ovulatory characteristics

Baaske AV et al., 2025 Journal of the Endocrine Society Free full text on PubMed Central

Tanner Breast Stage 3 (TB3, at menarche) and Tanner 5 (TB5, once ovulatory cycles established), despite being similar with an “upstanding” nipple, are different. Evidence suggests that steady and high ovulatory-level progesterone exposure accounts for the larger areolar diameter in TB5. Progesterone levels indicate whether the menstrual cycle is ovulatory and have crucial implications for women’s reproductive, metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone health. However, few data show average areolar diameter in regularly cycling women in whom SES, body size, and reproductive variables have been documented. As a step towards better understanding the role of areolar diameter in reflecting estradiol-progesterone balance, this study aims to document the average mean bilateral lateral areolar diameter (AD) in a cohort of regularly menstruating, premenopausal women in whom ovulation was documented in one cycle. We also aim to describe relationships between AD and demographic, anthropometric, and reproductive/ovulation variables. Women were eligible if aged 19-35 years with about month-apart cycles and no exogenous hormone use in the last 3-months. Participants completed one cycle with a daily Menstrual Cycle Diary© (cycle length, CL) and first morning temperatures for Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT©) ovulation analysis (normal luteal phase length ≥10 days). Questionnaires gathered SES, ethnic, general health, and reproductive characteristics. Bilateral horizontal areolar diameters were measured by a woman researcher with the participant supine in a warm room. From February 2020 to September 2022 (during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic), 73 women from Metro Vancouver, British Columbia participated. Women were of median (min-max) age 30 (19-35) years, BMI 24.5 (17.1-41.4) and most identified as White (61.6%) with a median of 16 years of education. Median CL was 29 days (n=65) and QBT data showed 39.3% were normally ovulatory, 34.4% had short luteal phases and 26.2% were anovulatory. Median within-woman bilateral AD was 3.85 (2.35-8.00) cm. Left AD exceeded right (L 3.8 [2.3,8.2]; R 3.7 [ 2.4,7.8]; P=.003). Larger AD (≥3.85cm) was associated with greater body size (BMI r=.534), weight and waist circumference. However, earlier age at menarche (P=.02) was also significantly associated. No other reproductive variables (cycle length, luteal phase length, parity, ever use of CHC) were related to AD before body size adjustments. This study is the first to document, and describe demographic, anthropomorphic and reproductive associations with, AD in community dwelling, regularly cycling, premenopausal women. Future steps will determine the most influential of the anthropometric variables; adjustment for these will facilitate assessments of associations with ovulation related characteristics.

Breast Health · Benign Breast Conditions

SAT-128 Prospective 1-year Menstrual CycleBreast Tenderness and Swelling Experiences—data from healthy regularly cycling women initially proven normally ovulatory on two consecutive cycles

Wood M et al., 2025 Journal of the Endocrine Society Free full text on PubMed Central

Breast tenderness and swelling are associated with premenstrual symptoms but have not been well described in healthy, normally cycling women with known ovulatory status. There are documented negative health risks (in bone, the cardiovascular system and cancers) in association with ovulatory disturbances within normal-length cycles. Identifying breast changes across a predictable, month-apart cycle but with Subclinical Ovulatory Disturbances (SOD, short luteal phase [<10 days] and anovulation (with normal estradiol but lower or absent progesterone levels) could advance our understanding of menstrual cycle physiology, women’s health education and identification of those with chronic SOD who may benefit from cyclic progesterone therapy. Our objective was to determine whether within-woman breast tenderness and swelling experiences differed between normally ovulatory and ovulatory-disturbed cycles. In this 1-year prospective observational study, we examined daily breast tenderness (0-4) and swelling (1-5 change from usual = 3) experiences recorded via the Menstrual Cycle Diary© over ≥8 cycles (mean=13/woman) in 53 women. Ovulatory status was documented by the twice-validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT©) analysis. Cycle and ovulatory data were previously reported (Prior NEJM, 1990); Diary data were unreported. Participants were healthy, community-dwelling women, mean age 34 (32.4:35.5 years), BMI 22.0, primarily White, and about two-thirds were runners (for health or were marathon-training). Comparison of breast parameters in all normally ovulatory (n = 495) vs all SOD cycles (n = 199) (mean cycle length 28.1 [27.5-28.8 days]), showed significantly higher Breast Tenderness Score [intensity X days; 6.0 (range 1.0, 14.0) vs. 3.0 (0.0, 11.0) (P = .001)] and increased breast size [4.0 (2.0, 4.0) vs. 4.0 (0.0, 4.0) (P = .034]) in normally ovulatory cycles. However, in within-woman analysis (n = 47 women with both normally ovulatory and SOD cycles), breast tenderness/swelling did not significantly differ by ovulatory status. We plotted all ovulatory cycles (n=676) centred on ovulation; this revealed parallel timing of increases in breast tenderness and swelling in the late luteal phase. These 1-year prospective data documented that mild breast tenderness and swelling occurred before flow in cycles with normal ovulation; symptoms were less in SOD cycles. Breast changes were totally absent during the follicular phases.

Hormonal Agents · Progesterone and Progestins

"SUN-109 Feasibility of Cyclic Progesterone and Spironolactone for PCOS-specific Health-Related Quality of Life—a six-month, Phase II, single arm, single center, open-label study"

Nelson K et al., 2025 J Endocr Soc Free full text on PubMed Central

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder that significantly decreases health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) are standard-of-care for PCOS but do not mitigate the neuroendocrine cause nor women’s primary concerns. Treatment options need expansion. We hypothesized cyclic oral micronized progesterone (CyclicP4) and spironolactone (Sp) would improve HRQoL, decrease LH, and acne. This Phase II, open-label single-arm pilot study evaluated the 6-month cyclicP4 and Sp treatment feasibility and safety in androgenic PCOS. Our primary outcome was within-woman change in PCOS-HRQoL (PCOSQ). No sample size calculation was possible; 40 was considered feasible. Eligible women were 19-40 years with physician-diagnosed androgenic PCOS. Exclusion criteria included HbA1c > 6.4%, use of metformin or CHC in the last month. Participants received progesterone (300 mg/bedtime 14 days/month); spironolactone (200 mg/day) began in cycle two. Adherence was tracked daily (Menstrual Cycle Diary©) and by pill counts. Safety was assessed by post-study potassium (K+). Feasibility by women’s post-trial treatment intention. PCOSQ, serum LH, calculated bioavailable testosterone (cBAT), HbA1c, hsCRP, and AMH were measured at baseline and trial end. We also assessed perceived acne and sleep changes (-5 to +5), K+ and therapy intent at study end. Six-month change by paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank assessed P < .05 as important. Of 109 expressing interest, 41 enrolled, 36 began therapy (5 did not), and 26 provided final questionnaire data (19 with complete lab data). Completing women were mean age 29 (SD 4.9) years, BMI 30.3 (8.1), 61.5% White and 73.1% with university degrees. Total PCOSQ scores within-woman increased from 3.5±1.0 to 4.9±1.1 (95% CI 3.1-3.8, 4.6-5.3; P<.0000001). Each PCOSQ domain significantly improved (at least P<.001) as did acne and sleep. Weight was unchanged but waist circumference decreased 1.1 cm (NS). LH, cBAT, and AMH each decreased: LH 10.0±5.4 to 8.5±5.2 IU/L (95% CI 7.6-12.3, 6.3-10.8; P<.4), cBAT 0.7±0.4 to 0.6±0.3 nmol/L (0.5-0.9, 0.5-0.8; P<.2), and AMH 10.5±6.5 to 9.7±5.7 ng/ml (7.4-13.7, 7.0-12.4; P<.4). hsCRP remained unchanged (2.8±3.3 to 2.7±3.6 mg/L; P<.8) as did HbA1c (5.2±0.3 to 5.2±0.3%; P<.0). K+ remained within the normal range (3.5-5.0 mmol/L) at final testing (mean 4.0). Two allergic responses to spironolactone and one frequent flow/religious practice led to discontinuation. Feasibility was confirmed and participants strongly preferred continuing therapy (median Likert score=6/7, P<.0001) CyclicP4 and Sp for 6-months was feasible and significantly improved HRQoL in a non-medicine-seeking community women cohort with androgenic PCOS. Though the small sample size limited generalizability, findings are promising. A larger randomized trial comparing CyclicP4 vs. CHC is warranted.

Related research

Neuroendocrinology · Hypothalamic Amenorrhea

Reproduction for the athletic woman. New understandings of physiology and management

Prior JC et al., 1992 Sports Med

A physically active and athletic lifestyle is not only a healthy but a fulfilling choice for women. Although there is extensive literature on 'athletic amenorrhoea' which implies that exercise causes loss of the menstrual cycle, there is inadequate scientific evidence for a causal relationship. The reproductive system adapts to environmental, nutritional, emotional and physical stressors or 'threats' by downward adjustment towards the premenarcheal pattern. The hormonal milieu of this adaptation is low gonadal steroid and high glucocorticoid levels which synergistically increase the risk for a negative bone balance. Athletic women may become amenorrhoeic if reproductive immaturity, emotional stress and undernutrition coexist with increasing exercise loads. Treatment for athletic women with menstrual cycle changes requires that hypothalamic stressors be identified and decreased. In addition, as progesterone deficiency (from disorders of ovulation, whether flow is regular or absent) is the most prevalent menstrual cycle change, treatment with medroxyprogesterone on days 16 to 25 of their cycle will not only provide regular flow (if estrogen levels are sufficient) but will also promote increased bone density.

Ovarian Hormones · Progesterone

Patterns of endogenous and exogenous ovarian hormone modulation on recovery metrics across the menstrual cycle

Sims ST et al., 2021 BMJ open sport & exercise medicine Free full text on PubMed Central

As the number of female athletes competing rises globally, training methodologies should reflect sex differences across critical metrics of adaptation to training. Surrogate markers of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) used for monitoring training load are heart rate variability (HRV) and resting heart rate (RHR). The aim was to investigate ovarian hormone effects on standard recovery metrics (HRV, RHR, respiratory rate (RR) and sleep duration) across a large population of female athletes. A retrospective study analysed 362 852 days of data representing 13 535 menstrual cycles (MC) from 4594 respondents (natural MC n=3870, BC n=455, progestin-only n=269) for relationships and/or differences between endogenous and exogenous ovarian hormones on ANS. HRV and return to baseline (recovery) decreased as resting HR and RR increased (p<0.001) from the early follicular to the late luteal phase of the MC. Patterning was paradoxical across phases for users of combined hormonal contraception (BC) as compared with the patterning of the MC. HRV and recovery start elevated and drop off quickly during the withdrawal bleed, rising through the active pill weeks (p<0.001). Progestin-only users had similar patterning as the MC. The relationship between normalised recovery and previous day strain is modulated by birth control type. BC exhibited steeper declines in recovery with additional strain-normalised recovery decreases by an additional 0.0055±0.00135 (p<0.001) per unit of strain; with no significant difference between MC and progestin-only (p=0.19). The patterning of ANS modulation from ovarian hormones is significantly different between naturally cycling women and those on BC, with the patterning dependent on the type of contraception used.

Cycle Physiology · Hormonal Regulation

The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Athletes' Performance: A Narrative Review

Carmichael MA et al., 2021 International journal of environmental research and public health Free full text on PubMed Central

The effect of the menstrual cycle on physical performance is being increasingly recognised as a key consideration for women's sport and a critical field for further research. This narrative review explores the findings of studies investigating the effects of menstrual cycle phase on perceived and objectively measured performance in an athletic population. Studies examining perceived performance consistently report that female athletes identify their performance to be relatively worse during the early follicular and late luteal phases. Studies examining objective performance (using anaerobic, aerobic or strength-related tests) do not report clear, consistent effects of the impact of menstrual cycle phase on physical performance. Overall sport performance can be influenced by both perceived and physical factors. Hence, to optimise performance and management of eumenorrheic female athletes, there is a need for further research to quantify the impact of menstrual cycle phase on perceived and physical performance outcomes and to identify factors affecting variability in objective performance outcomes between studies.

Cycle Physiology · Hormonal Regulation

The Effects of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Elite Athlete Performance: A Critical and Systematic Review

Meignié A et al., 2021 Frontiers in physiology Free full text on PubMed Central

In elite athletes, training individualization is widely recommended to optimize competitive performance. Previous studies have evidenced the impact of hormonal fluctuations on different performance parameters among female athletes. While consideration of menstrual cycle (MC) phases as a parameter in training individualization strategies is necessary, systematic evidence identifying such impacts in elite athletes should be evaluated. Systematically review publications that have investigated the link between MC phases and performance in elite female athletes. The overarching aim is to identify whether a consensus across studies exists enabling evidence-based recommendations for training individualization depending on menstrual cycle phases. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three major scientific publication databases were searched from inception until November 3, 2020. Studies included focused on the influence of physiological or psychological parameters throughout at least one phase of the menstrual cycle of elite athletes. A total of 780 search results were yielded and 26 references from a past bibliography were added manually. About 662 papers were reviewed of which 218 studies were assessed for eligibility. Of these, only seven (1%) precisely investigated the influence of a performance or physical parameter during at least one menstrual cycle phase. These seven studies included a total of 314 elite female participants (20.58 ± 1.91 years). Three used interviews, questionnaires or prospective analyses of reports. Four conducted several performance tests or included physical measures although only two performed tests during training or before/during competition. Among the seven studies, five performed hormonal testing through sampling of blood, saliva, or urine. The remaining relied on athletes' menstruation diaries. The current evidence suggests a variable association between menstrual cycle and a few performance-related outcomes, such as endurance or power resistance, ligament stiffness, decision making skills, psychology, or competitiveness. Different sports performance-related parameters are affected during the menstrual cycle among elite athletes, but the parameters themselves and the magnitude and the direction of the effects are inconclusive. Additional longitudinal and prospective studies to systematically monitor on-field performance parameters are urgently required in order to enable recommendations and training individualization in female elite athletes.

Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Estrogen · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Physiology › Hormonal Regulation

Donald C McKenzie, Jerilynn C Prior

Don McKenzie, D McKenzie, J Prior

DOI 10.1249/00005768-199503000-00022 10.1249/00005768-199503000-00022 Lebrun et al. 1995, Lebrun 1995

Cite this article

Lebrun, C. M., McKenzie, D. C., Prior, J. C., & Taunton, J. E. (1995). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on athletic performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 27(3), 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199503000-00022

Keywords

Hemoglobins, Progesterone, Estradiol