Enrollment, Childbearing Motivations, and Intentions of Couples in the Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions, and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA) Study
The Creighton Model FertilityCare(TM) System (CrM) is a standardized approach for educating women about the biomarkers of their fertility. Couples can use this information for timing intercourse during "fertile" or "infertile" days in order to try to conceive or to avoid pregnancy.
Objectives
The study of Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions, and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA) was conducted to assess fertility motivations, intentions, fertility-related sexual behaviors, and their impact on effectiveness to avoid and to conceive among new users of the CrM. This paper reports enrollment baseline characteristics.
SETTINGS AND
Design
We conducted this prospective cohort study at 17 CrM FertilityCare(TM) Centers; 16 in the USA and one in Toronto, Canada.
Materials and Methods
Couples who were new or returning users of the CrM were eligible. Couples who were initially trying to conceive or had a history of subfertility were excluded. Couples were enrolled and followed prospectively by their CrM instructors and also by CEIBA study staff. They completed baseline questionnaires.
Results
1,132 new couples were assessed; 1,090 (96%) couples were screened; 429 (39%) couples were eligible; 305 women (71%) and 290 (95%) male partners were enrolled. The majority of women was engaged (39%) or married (51%), college graduates (77%), Caucasian non-Hispanic (80%), and Roman Catholic (80%). The most common reasons for learning CrM (women) were to use a natural method for family planning (91%), for moral/ethical/religious reasons (70%), the lack of side effects (71%), or insight into the menstrual cycle and fertility (62%). Women and men intended to have a mean of three and two additional children, respectively. Of women, 21% intended to have a child within a year and 60% between 1 and 3 years. The mean positive childbearing motivation score was 3.3 for both women and men (range 1-4, with 4 being most positive).
Conclusion
Couples beginning use of the CrM to avoid pregnancy have high levels of motivation, desire, and intention for future childbearing. The CEIBA study has prospective measures of desires, intentions, and sexual/fertility behaviors for up to 1 year. We will assess the impact of desires, intentions, and behaviors on the pregnancy rates among these couples.
Stanford Porucznik CEIBA study Creighton Model enrollment childbearing motivations intentions, Creighton Model FertilityCare System effectiveness intentions behaviors assessment study, couple enrollment motivations natural family planning avoid achieve pregnancy intentions, CEIBA study prospective cohort CrM users childbearing goals religious motivations, Frontiers Medicine 2017 Creighton Model couples intentions childbearing prospective, natural family planning user demographics motivations fertility goals CrM enrollment, FertilityCare practitioner teaching couple relationship Creighton Model instruction, pregnancy intention avoiding achieving breastfeeding monitoring couples CrM study, Catholic couples natural family planning religious secular motivations CrM enrollment, Stanford CEIBA Creighton Model multicenter prospective effectiveness behavior study
PMID 28944223 28944223 DOI 10.3389/fmed.2017.00147 10.3389/fmed.2017.00147
Cite this article
Stanford, J. B., & Porucznik, C. A. (2017). Enrollment, Childbearing Motivations, and Intentions of Couples in the Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions, and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA) Study. Frontiers in medicine, 4, 147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00147
Stanford JB, Porucznik CA. Enrollment, Childbearing Motivations, and Intentions of Couples in the Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions, and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA) Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:147. doi:10.3389/fmed.2017.00147
Stanford, J. B., and C. A. Porucznik. "Enrollment, Childbearing Motivations, and Intentions of Couples in the Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions, and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA) Study." Frontiers in medicine, vol. 4, 2017, pp. 147.
Keywords
Attitudes, Behavioral Methods, Cervical Mucus Method, Family Planning, Knowledge, Natural Family Planning, Practice, Pregnancy Intentions
Curcumin, a bioactive polyphenol derived from turmeric (Curcuma longa), has garnered substantial attention for its potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antineoplastic properties. This review explores the therapeutic potential of curcumin in gynecologic health, with a focus on its role in the management of ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers, as well as benign conditions such as endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, premenstrual syndrome, and menopausal symptoms. A literature review was conducted on the health effects of gynecology. Relevant articles were identified through systematic searches in major biomedical databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies reporting the relationship between curcumin and some in gynecological diseasess as of 2025. Curcumin modulates key inflammatory signaling pathways, reduces oxidative stress, and exerts antiproliferative effects, making it a promising adjunct in the treatment of both neoplastic and inflammatory gynecologic disorders. Nevertheless, clinical translation remains limited by challenges such as poor bioavailability and a paucity of large-scale, randomized controlled trials. Emerging evidence supports the integration of curcumin into multimodal treatment strategies, particularly in oncology and chronic inflammatory conditions. In light of the need to improve treatment efficacy and enhance patients' quality of life, the exploration of novel adjuvant therapeutic strategies is highly warranted. Recent studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of curcumin and its novel analogues across a range of gynecologic diseases, while advances in formulation technologies have led to improved pharmacokinetic profiles and therapeutic outcomes. Nevertheless, further robust clinical investigations are required to optimize curcumin formulations, enhance bioavailability, and establish evidence-based guidelines for its integration into gynecologic care. This review synthesizes current evidence and highlights the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed effects, aiming to support the rational development of curcumin-based strategies in gynecology.
NaProTECHNOLOGYHormonal SupplementationDHEA TreatmentFemale
Open Access
Hypoandrogenemia is not usually considered as a potential cause of recurrent miscarriage. We present the case of a 30-year-old female with 6 previous pregnancies resulting in one live birth and 5 pregnancy losses, including fetal demise at 24 weeks gestation. She had standard investigations after her 4th loss, at a specialized miscarriage clinic. Lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, thyroid function, parental karyotypes were all normal. Fetal products confirmed triploidy for her 4th miscarriage at 16 weeks gestation. She was reassured and advised to conceive again but had fetal demise after 24 weeks gestation. This was her 5th pregnancy loss with no explanation. She attended our Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) clinic in January 2022. In addition to poor follicle function, we found hypoandrogenemia for the first time. Treatment included follicle stimulation with clomiphene and DHEA 25 mg twice daily pre-conception with DHEA 20 mg once daily maintained throughout pregnancy. She delivered a healthy baby boy by cesarean section at 36 weeks gestation in November 2023. Hypoandrogenemia should be considered as a contributory factor for women with recurrent miscarriage or late pregnancy loss. Restoration of androgens to normal levels with oral DHEA is safe and can improve pregnancy outcome.
Contraception/ComparisonReproductive Endocrinology
Open Access
Hormone-based contraception disrupts hormonal balance, creating artificial states of anovulation and threatening women's health. We reviewed its main adverse effects and mechanisms on accelerated ovarian aging, mental health (emotional disruptions, depression, and suicide), sexuality (reduced libido), cardiovascular (brain stroke, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and thrombosis), and oncological (breast, cervical, and endometrial cancers). Other "collateral damage" includes negative effects on communication, scientific mistrust, poor physician-patient relationships, increased patient burden, economic drain on the healthcare system, and environmental pollution. Hormone-sensitive tumors present a dilemma owing to preventing some cancers vs. higher risk for others remains controversial, with denial or dismissal as non-relevant adverse effects, information avoidance, and modification of scientific criteria. This lack of clinical assessment poses challenges to women's health and their right to autonomy. Overcoming these challenges requires an anthropological integration of sexuality, as the focus on genital bodily union alone fails to encompass the intimate relational expression of individuals, complete sexual satisfaction, and the intertwined feelings of trust, safety, tenderness, and endorsement of women's femininity.
Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) educate about reproductive health and enable tracking and interpretation of physical signs, such as cervical fluid secretions and basal body temperature, which reflect the hormonal changes women experience on a cyclical basis during the years of ovarian activity. Some methods measure relevant hormone levels directly. Most FABMs allow women to identify ovulation and track this "vital sign" of the menstrual or female reproductive cycle, through daily observations recorded on cycle charts (paper or electronic). Physicians can use the information from FABM charts to guide the diagnosis and management of medical conditions and to support or restore healthy function of the reproductive and endocrine systems, using a restorative reproductive medical (RRM) approach. FABMs can also be used by couples to achieve or avoid pregnancy and may be most effective when taught by a trained instructor. Information about individual FABMs is rarely provided in medical education. Outdated information is widespread both in training programs and in the public sphere. Obtaining accurate information about FABMs is further complicated by the numerous period tracking or fertility apps available, because very few of these apps have evidence to support their effectiveness for identifying the fertile window, for achieving or preventing pregnancy. This article provides an overview of different types of FABMs with a published evidence base, apps and resources for learning and using FABMs, the role FABMs can play in medical evaluation and management, and the effectiveness of FABMs for family planning, both to achieve or to avoid pregnancy.