The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care : the Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception, 22(5), 396-397, 2017
Abstract
Sir,Currently, a variety of start-up companies are developing mobile phone apps to track the menstrual cycle and the fertile window, for the use of women who are trying to conceive or trying to avo...
Topics
fertility awareness mobile app menstrual cycle tracking, Frank-Herrmann Freundl fertility app evaluation, mobile phone application fertile window prediction, natural family planning digital technology, Stanford JB fertility awareness method app, cycle tracking app accuracy avoiding pregnancy, smartphone app ovulation detection fertile window, fertility awareness based methods digital tools, menstrual cycle app trying to conceive, start-up companies fertility tracking apps regulation
PMID 28849952 28849952 DOI 10.1080/13625187.2017.1362691 10.1080/13625187.2017.1362691 Frank-Herrmann et al. 2017, Frank-Herrmann 2017
Cite this article
Frank-Herrmann, P., Stanford, J. B., & Freundl, G. (2017). Fertility awareness-based mobile application. The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception, 22(5), 396-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2017.1362691
Frank-Herrmann P, Stanford JB, Freundl G. Fertility awareness-based mobile application. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(5):396-397. doi:10.1080/13625187.2017.1362691
Frank-Herrmann, P., et al. "Fertility awareness-based mobile application." The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception, vol. 22, no. 5, 2017, pp. 396-397.
Keywords
Algorithms, Female, Fertility, Humans, Mobile Applications
Related articles
fertility-awareness/technology/cycle-tracking-apps contraception/comparative-studies/contraception-versus-fertility-awarenessresearch-methods/study-design/document-and-website-content-analysis
A comparison of app-defined fertile days from two fertility tracking apps using identical cycle data
Manhart MD et al., 2022 · Contraception
The Natural Cycles app employs daily basal body temperature to define the fertile window via a proprietary algorithm and is clinically established effective in preventing pregnancy. We sought to (1) compare the app-defined fertile window of Natural Cycles to that of CycleProGo, an app that uses BBT and cervical mucus to define the fertile window and (2) compare the app-defined fertile windows to the estimated physiologic fertile window. Daily BBT were entered into Natural Cycles from 20 randomly selected regularly cycling women with at least 12 complete cycles from the CycleProGo database. The proportion of cycles with equivalent (±1 cycle day) fertile-window starts and fertile-window ends was determined. The app-defined fertile windows were then compared to the estimated physiologic fertile window using Peak mucus to estimate ovulation. Fifty seven percent of cycles (136/238) had equivalent fertile-window starts and 36% (72/181) had equivalent fertile-window end days. The mean overall fertile-window length from Natural Cycles was 12.8 days compared to 15.1 days for CycleProGo (p < 0.001). The Natural Cycles algorithm declared 12% to 30% of cycles with a fertile-window start and 13% to 38% of cycles with a fertile-window end within the estimated physiologic fertile window. The CycleProGo algorithm declared 4% to 14% of cycles with a fertile-window start and no cycles with a fertile-window end within the estimated physiologic fertile window. Natural Cycles designated a higher proportion of cycles days as infertile within the estimated physiologic fertile window than CycleProGo. Use of cervical mucus in addition to BBT may improve the accuracy of identifying the fertile window. Additional studies with other markers of ovulation and the fertile window would give additional insight into the clinical implications of app-defined fertile window differences.
fertility-awareness/technology/cycle-tracking-apps
Open Access
Goals, life events, and transitions: examining fertility apps for holistic health tracking
Costa Figueiredo M et al., 2021 · JAMIA Open
Fertility is becoming increasingly supported by consumer health technologies, especially mobile apps that support self-tracking activities. However, it is not clear whether the apps support the variety of goals and life events of those who menstruate, especially during transitions between them. Thirty-one of the most popular fertility apps were evaluated, analyzing data from three sources: the content of app store pages, app features, and user reviews. Findings: Results suggest that fertility apps are designed to support specific life goals of people who menstruate, offering several data collection features and limited feedback options. However, users often desire holistic tracking that encompasses a variety of goals, life events, and the transitions among them. These findings suggest fertility patients can benefit more from holistic self-tracking and provide insights for future design of consumer health technologies that better support holistic fertility tracking. Fertility apps have the potential to support varied experiences of people who menstruate. But to achieve that, apps need to expand their support by offering ways for more users to perform holistic, personalized, and personally meaningful tracking, so they can derive long-term benefit from the data they collect.
fertility-awareness/technology/cycle-tracking-apps health-economics/access-and-coverage/workforce-and-availability
Open Access
Do fertility tracking applications offer women useful information about their fertile window?
Ali R et al., 2020 · Reprod Biomed Online
To characterize mobile fertility tracking applications (apps) to determine the use of such apps for women trying to conceive by identifying the fertile window. An exploratory cross-sectional audit study was conducted of fertility tracking applications. Ninety out of a possible total 200 apps were included for full review. The main outcome measures were the underlying app method for predicting ovulation, the fertile window, or both, price to download and use the app, disclaimers and cautions, information and features provided and tracked, and app marketing strategies. All the apps except one monitored the women's menstrual cycle dates. Most apps only tracked menstrual cycle dates (n = 49 [54.4%]). The remainder tracked at least one fertility-based awareness method (basal body temperature, cervical mucus, LH) (n = 41 [45.6%]). Twenty-five apps measured dates, basal body temperature, LH and cervical mucus (27.8%). Seventy-six per cent of apps were free to download with free apps having more desirable features, tracking more measures and having more and better quality educational insights than paid apps. Seventy per cent of apps were classified as feminine apps, 41% of which were pink in colour. Mobile fertility tracking apps are heterogenous in their underlying methods of predicting fertile days, the price to obtain full app functionality, and in content and design. Unreliable calendar apps remain the most commonly available fertility apps on the market. The unregulated nature of fertility apps is a concern that could be addressed by app regulating bodies. The possible benefit of using fertility apps to reduce time to pregnancy needs to be evaluated.
menstrual-cycle/cycle-across-the-lifespan/cycle-and-general-health longevity/lifespan-health/cycle-as-a-lifespan-health-markerfertility-awareness/technology/cycle-tracking-apps
Menstrual Cycle Length and Patterns in a Global Cohort of Women Using a Mobile Phone App: Retrospective Cohort Study
Grieger JA et al., 2020 · Journal of medical Internet research
There is increasing information characterizing menstrual cycle length in women, but less information is available on the potential differences across lifestyle variables. This study aimed to describe differences in menstrual cycle length, variability, and menstrual phase across women of different ages and BMI among a global cohort of Flo app users. We have also reported on demographic and lifestyle characteristics across median cycle lengths. The analysis was run based on the aggregated anonymized dataset from a menstrual cycle tracker and ovulation calendar that covers all phases of the reproductive cycle. Self-reported information is documented, including demographics, menstrual flow and cycle length, ovulation information, and reproductive health and diseases. Data from women aged ≥18 years and who had logged at least three cycles (ie, 2 completed cycles and 1 current cycle) in the Flo app were included (1,579,819 women). Of the 1.5 million users, approximately half (638,683/1,579,819, 40.42%) were aged between 18 and 24 years. Just over half of those reporting BMIs were in the normal range (18.5-24.9 kg/m2; 202,420/356,598, 56.76%) and one-third were overweight or obese (>25 kg/m2; 120,983/356,598, 33.93%). A total of 16.32% (257,889/1,579,819) of women had a 28-day median cycle length. There was a higher percentage of women aged ≥40 years who had a 27-day median cycle length than those aged between 18 and 24 years (22,294/120,612, 18.48% vs 60,870/637,601, 9.55%), but a lower percentage with a 29-day median cycle length (10,572/120,612, 8.77% vs 79,626/637,601, 12.49%). There were a higher number of cycles with short luteal phases in younger women, whereas women aged ≥40 years had a higher number of cycles with longer luteal phases. Median menstrual cycle length and the length of the follicular and luteal phases were not remarkably different with increasing BMI, except for the heaviest women at a BMI of ≥50 kg/m2. On a global scale, we have provided extensive evidence on the characteristics of women and their menstrual cycle length and patterns across different age and BMI groups. This information is necessary to support updates of current clinical guidelines around menstrual cycle length and patterns for clinical use in fertility programs.