Cohen, G. C., Prior, J. C., Vigna, Y., & Pride, S. M. (1989). Intense Exercise During the First Two Trimesters of Unapparent Pregnancy. The Physician and sportsmedicine, 17(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.1989.11709684
Cohen GC, Prior JC, Vigna Y, Pride SM. Intense Exercise During the First Two Trimesters of Unapparent Pregnancy. Phys Sportsmed. 1989;17(1):87-94. doi:10.1080/00913847.1989.11709684
Cohen, G. C., et al. "Intense Exercise During the First Two Trimesters of Unapparent Pregnancy." The Physician and sportsmedicine, vol. 17, no. 1, 1989, pp. 87-94.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Author affiliations
2 institutions
Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre05p83my93
Two runners who were not aware they had conceived continued their intense running regimens during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Both women assumed that their amenorrhea was due to endurance training. When their pregnancies were diagnosed, both women markedly reduced their training mileage during the third trimester because they feared that intense exercise might harm the fetus. Retrospective data were collected on their antenatal and intrapartum courses. Both women delivered healthy infants of normal weight. Although these two cases suggest that strenuous anaerobic exercise during pregnancy is not harmful, more studies are needed to determine if these cases are isolated.
Guthardt Y et al., 2026·Sci Rep·Free full text on PubMed Central
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between menstrual cycle phases and the incidence of muscle injuries in female team sport athletes, following PRISMA 2020 and PERSiST guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus from inception to mid-January 2024. Studies were included if they examined female team sport athletes of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles and compared the occurrence of muscle injuries across at least two menstrual phases. Studies involving hormonal contraceptive use, medications affecting the menstrual cycle or musculoskeletal system, or menstrual dysfunction were excluded. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 318 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled Risk Ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.86, p = 0.46) for injury risk between the luteal and follicular phases, suggesting no statistically significant association. However, the certainty of the cumulative evidence was rated as very low due to methodological limitations, including inconsistent phase classifications and reliance on imprecise methods for identifying menstrual phases. Consequently, no practical or clinical recommendations can be made at this time. Future research employing standardised, physiologically accurate methods for classifying and detecting menstrual cycle phases is necessary to better understand the potential links between hormonal fluctuations and injury risk.
Duchette C et al., 2024·International journal of women's health·Free full text on PubMed Central
Research demonstrates resistance training is not only safe but also beneficial for pregnant women. However, exercise recommendations for pregnant women still minimize the importance of resistance exercise and provide minimal guidance. With a large increase in strength-focused sports among women, it is critical to re-evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of these exercises and ensure the latest recommendations reflect the latest clinical research. The purpose of this review is to highlight the safety and benefits of resistance training for both maternal and fetal health, particularly focusing on recent work. Relevant research involving resistance training during pregnancy was accessed and analyzed via a quasi-systematic search. Results demonstrate that appropriate prenatal resistance training can help alleviate some of the common symptoms of pregnancy, such as fatigue, back pain, and poor mental health. Resistance exercise can assist with glucose control in gestational diabetes mellitus, as well as decrease the risk of infant macrosomia and childhood metabolic dysfunction associated with uncontrolled gestational diabetes. Resistance training can also increase the likelihood of a vaginal delivery, which is beneficial for both mother and baby. Concerning fetal health, resistance training increases uterine blood flow, decreases the risk of neonatal macrosomia, and improves cognitive function and metabolic health in childhood. As with all forms of exercise, pregnant women should avoid resistance exercises that involve the supine position for extended bouts of time, trauma (or risk of trauma) to the abdomen, ballistic movements, movements that rely heavily on balance, and conditions that prohibit appropriate temperature control. With these considerations in mind, resistance training's benefits far surpass the lack of risk to the fetus. Resistance training is a safe and effective way to improve and maintain physical fitness during pregnancy and represents no risk to fetal health and development. Thus, healthcare providers should recommend resistance training for pregnant women.
Russo LM et al., 2020·Fertil Steril·Free full text on PubMed Central
To estimate the association between physical activity and risk of subclinical and clinical pregnancy loss among women with a history of pregnancy loss.
Prospective cohort study as a secondary analysis of the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction randomized controlled trial of preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin among women with one or two prior pregnancy losses.
Four U.S. clinical centers, 2007-2011. PATIENT(S): Women with confirmed pregnancy (n = 785) as determined from hCG testing in longitudinally collected biospecimens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subclinical loss of pregnancy detected only by hCG testing and clinically recognized loss. RESULT(S): Among 785 women (mean [SD] age, 28.7 [4.6] years) with an hCG-confirmed pregnancy, 188 (23.9%) experienced pregnancy loss. In multivariable models adjusted for confounders, compared with the first tertile of physical activity (median = 7.7 metabolic equivalent of task hours/week), there was a roughly twofold higher risk of subclinical loss in the second (risk ratio = 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.14) and third tertiles (risk ratio = 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-3.90), with median metabolic equivalent of task hours/week of 27.8 and 95.7, respectively. No relations were observed between physical activity and clinically recognized loss. CONCLUSION(S): Risk related to physical activity is different for pregnancy failure close to the time of implantation compared with that for later, clinical pregnancy loss. Higher physical activity levels were associated with an elevated risk of subclinical loss (i.e., pregnancies detected only by hCG, n = 55); however, no relationship was observed with clinically recognized loss. Further work is required to confirm these findings, assess generalizability to women without prior losses, and evaluate mechanisms. Ethical Approval: Each participating center's Institutional Review Board approved the study, and participants provided written informed consent. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00467363), and a Data Safety and Monitoring Board provided oversight. : Estimar la asociación entre la actividad física y el riesgo de pèrdida gestacional subclínica y clínica entre mujeres con historia de pèrdida gestacional. DISEÑO:: Estudio prospectivo de cohortes como análisis secundario de un estudio aleatorizado de los efectos de aspirina en la gestación y la reproducción, utilizando bajas dosis de aspirina desde la preconcepción entre mujeres con una o dos pèrdidas gestacionales previas. : Cuatro clínicas en Estados Unidos, entre 2007–2011. : Mujeres con embarazo confirmado (n= 785) determinado por pruebas de hCG en muestras biológicas recogidas longitudinalmente. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO(S):: Pérdida gestacional subclínica detectada sólo por la prueba de hCG y la reconocida clínicamente. : Entre 785 mujeres (media de edad [Deviación standard], 28,7 [4,6] años) con una gestación confirmada con hCG, 188 (23.9%) que tuvieron pérdida gestacional. En un modelo multivariante ajustado para factores de confusión comparado con el primer tercil de actividad física (media= 7,7 equivalentes metabólicos de trabajo horas/semana) hubo un riesgo bruto dos veces mayor de pérdida subclínica en el segundo (relación de riesgo= 2,06; Intervalo de confianza 95%, 1,03–4,14) y el tercer tercil (Relación de riesgo = 1,92 Intervalo de confianza 95%, 0,94–3,9) con una media metabólica equivalente de trabajo horas/semana de 27,8 y 95,7 respectivamente. No hubo relación entre actividad física y pérdidas gestacionales clínicas. : El riesgo asociado a actividad física es diferente para fallo gestacional próximo al momento de la implantación comparado con el más tardío de pérdida gestacional clínica. Niveles mayores de actividad física estuvieron asociados con un riesgo elevado de pérdida subclínica (por ejemplo, embarazos detectados solo por hCG, n=55); sin embargo, no se observó relación con pérdida clínicamente reconocida. Se necesitan más trabajos para confirmar estos hallazgos, evaluando de forma general mujeres sin pérdidas gestacionales previas, y evaluar sus mecanismos. APROBACIÓN ÉTICA:: El comité de revisión institucional de cada centro participante aprobó el estudio y los participantes dieron por escrito su consentimiento informado. El ensayo fue registrado en ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT00467363), y el comité de seguridad y monitorización de los datos dio su aprobación
Russo LM et al., 2018·Hum Reprod·Free full text on PubMed Central
Is physical activity (PA) associated with fecundability in women with a history of prior pregnancy loss? Higher fecundability was related to walking among overweight/obese women and to vigorous PA in women overall. PA may influence fecundability through altered endocrine function. Studies evaluating this association have primarily utilized Internet-based recruitment and self-report for pregnancy assessment and have yielded conflicting results. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, Duration: This is a secondary analysis of the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction (EAGeR) trial (2007-2011), a multisite, randomized controlled trial of preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, Healthy women (n = 1214), aged 18-40 and with 1-2 prior pregnancy losses, were recruited from four US medical centers. Participants were followed for up to six menstrual cycles while attempting pregnancy and through pregnancy for those who became pregnant. Time to hCG detected pregnancy was assessed using discrete-time Cox proportional hazard models to estimate fecundability odds ratios (FOR) adjusted for covariates, accounting for left truncation and right censoring. Main The association of walking with fecundability varied significantly by BMI (P-interaction = 0.01). Among overweight/obese women, walking ≥10 min at a time was related to improved fecundability (FOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.77). In adjusted models, women reporting >4 h/wk of vigorous activity had significantly higher fecundability (FOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.24, 2.31) compared to no vigorous activity. Associations of vigorous activity with fecundability were not significantly different by BMI (P-interaction = 0.9). Moderate activity, sitting, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) categories were not associated with fecundability overall or in BMI-stratified analyses. LIMITATIONS, Some misclassification of PA levels as determined by the short form of the IPAQ is likely to have occurred, and may have led to non-differential misclassification of exposure in our study. Information on diet and change in BMI was not collected and may have contributed to some residual confounding in our results. The generalizability of our results may be limited as our population consisted of women with a history of one or two pregnancy losses. These findings provide positive evidence for the benefits of PA in women attempting pregnancy, especially for walking among those with higher BMI. Further study is necessary to clarify possible mechanisms through which walking and vigorous activity might affect time-to-pregnancy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. #NCT00467363.
Lifestyle and Environment › Physical Activity › Exercise and Ovulation · Pregnancy › Early Pregnancy › Miscarriage · Birth and Delivery › Birth Outcomes › Maternal Morbidity
Jerilynn C Prior
J Prior
PMID 27448004 27448004 DOI 10.1080/00913847.1989.11709684 10.1080/00913847.1989.11709684 Cohen et al. 1989, Cohen 1989
Cite this article
Cohen, G. C., Prior, J. C., Vigna, Y., & Pride, S. M. (1989). Intense Exercise During the First Two Trimesters of Unapparent Pregnancy. The Physician and sportsmedicine, 17(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.1989.11709684
Cohen GC, Prior JC, Vigna Y, Pride SM. Intense Exercise During the First Two Trimesters of Unapparent Pregnancy. Phys Sportsmed. 1989;17(1):87-94. doi:10.1080/00913847.1989.11709684
Cohen, G. C., et al. "Intense Exercise During the First Two Trimesters of Unapparent Pregnancy." The Physician and sportsmedicine, vol. 17, no. 1, 1989, pp. 87-94.