Contraception Oral Contraceptives

MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives

Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Carter V, Petrie M

Published December 7, 2008 Proceedings. Biological sciences, 275(1652), 2715-22
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.0825 PMID 18700206 PMC PMC2605820

RRM Academy Synopsis

Women's odor preferences shifted after starting the birth control pill

A 2008 before-and-after study of 97 women found that odor ratings were associated with a shift toward men with similar MHC genes after women started the contraceptive pill. The shift was not evident in the 60 women who stayed off the pill. Before any pill use, the women showed no overall preference for dissimilar men.

Key Findings

  • The study registered 193 women, and 97 completed both sessions: 60 in the control group and 37 in the pill group, tested a median of 95 days apart.
  • In session 1, when no woman used the pill, MHC dissimilarity had no significant effect on odor pleasantness or desirability (p>0.68).
  • In the core sample, preference for MHC dissimilarity fell across sessions among pill users, with a group-by-session effect of F3,71=3.05 and p=0.034.
  • Pleasantness ratings stayed correlated from session to session in controls (p<0.001, t59=4.86) but not in pill users (p=0.515, t36=0.66).
  • At session 1, relationship status mattered (F1,83=4.72, p=0.033): women in relationships rated dissimilar men as better long-term partners, while single women favored similar men.

Interpretation

This is a longitudinal study in which each woman rated the same kind of shirt odors twice. Women chose for themselves whether to start the pill, so the groups were not randomized. The authors report that pill users rated all odors higher than non-users even before starting the pill. Participants were mostly students and staff at one university, and the core analysis covered white British women. The pill finding appeared in that core sample and was driven by the partner desirability ratings.

RRM Context

RRM care supports a woman's own cycle. This study adds odor-based partner preference to the questions asked about hormonal contraception. Restorative care keeps the menstrual cycle intact, so a woman's own cycle-timed hormonal signals remain in place.

Abstract

Previous studies in animals and humans show that genes in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) influence individual odours and that females often prefer odour of MHC-dissimilar males, perhaps to increase offspring heterozygosity or reduce inbreeding. Women using oral hormonal contraceptives have been reported to have the opposite preference, raising the possibility that oral contraceptives alter female preference towards MHC similarity, with possible fertility costs. Here we test directly whether contraceptive pill use alters odour preferences using a longitudinal design in which women were tested before and after initiating pill use; a control group of non-users were tested with a comparable interval between test sessions. In contrast to some previous studies, there was no significant difference in ratings between odours of MHC-dissimilar and MHC-similar men among women during the follicular cycle phase. However, single women preferred odours of MHC-similar men, while women in relationships preferred odours of MHC-dissimilar men, a result consistent with studies in other species, suggesting that paired females may seek to improve offspring quality through extra-pair partnerships. Across tests, we found a significant preference shift towards MHC similarity associated with pill use, which was not evident in the control group. If odour plays a role in human mate choice, our results suggest that contraceptive pill use could disrupt disassortative mate preferences.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Contraception › Oral Contraceptives › Metabolic Effects · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Estrogen
S Craig Roberts, L Morris Gosling, Vaughan Carter, Marion Petrie
V Carter, M Petrie
PMID 18700206 18700206 DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.0825 10.1098/rspb.2008.0825 Roberts et al. 2008, Roberts 2008