It has been suggested that use of the oral contraceptive pill by women confers protection against osteoporosis later in life. However, cross-sectional studies of bone density among pill users have yielded discrepant results. We therefore investigated the relationship between pill use and subsequent occurrence of fracture in a cohort of 46,000 women enrolled in the Royal College of General Practitioners Oral Contraception Study during 482,083 person-years of follow-up. Fracture risk was lower among multiparous women, non-smokers, and those of lower socio-economic class. The risk of subsequent fractures among the women who had ever used the oral contraceptive pill was significantly greater than that among women who had never used it (relative risk 1.20, 95% confidence intervals 1.08-1.34) after adjustment for these variables. When the analysis was confined to forearm fractures, no significant effect of pill use on fracture risk was detected. Although the study only includes limited observation of older women to date, these data do not support the hypothesis that pill use protects women against the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures in later life.
oral contraceptive pill fracture risk prospective study, oral contraceptive use osteoporosis bone protection women, Cooper Hannaford oral contraceptive fracture risk RCGP study, Royal College General Practitioners oral contraception fracture study, hormonal contraception bone density fracture long-term outcomes, oral contraceptive pill forearm fracture osteoporotic fracture, contraceptive pill bone health smoking parity fracture risk, oral contraceptive pill does not protect against fractures, prospective cohort study oral contraceptive bone fractures women, pill use postmenopausal osteoporotic fracture risk
PMID 8443001 8443001 DOI 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90254-8 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90254-8
Cite this article
Cooper, C., Hannaford, P., Croft, P., & Kay, C. R. (1993). Oral contraceptive pill use and fractures in women: a prospective study. Bone, 14(1), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90254-8
Cooper C, Hannaford P, Croft P, Kay CR. Oral contraceptive pill use and fractures in women: a prospective study. Bone. 1993;14(1):41-45. doi:10.1016/8756-3282(93)90254-8
Cooper, C., et al. "Oral contraceptive pill use and fractures in women: a prospective study." Bone, vol. 14, no. 1, 1993, pp. 41-45.
Related articles
Bone HealthAntiretroviral Therapy EffectsBone Mineral DensityHR-pQCT Assessment
With the advent of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), life expectancy has increased among persons living with HIV, but so too has risk for comorbidities including osteoporosis and fragility fracture. To explore whether HIV status and cART influence three-dimensional measures of BMD, bone microarchitecture and strength we aimed to compare these outcomes between women living with HIV (WLWH; n = 50; 50.4 ± 1.2 years, 44% postmenopausal) and without HIV (controls; n = 50; 51.8 ± 1.2 years, 52% postmenopausal). Outcomes were lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck areal BMD by DXA; distal radius and tibia trabecular BMD, thickness and number, and cortical BMD and area by HR-pQCT; and finite element analysis-derived bone strength (failure load). Multivariable regression analysis compared bone outcomes between groups adjusting for known osteoporosis risk factors. Within WLWH, we examined associations between bone outcomes and HIV-related factors including disease severity and cART duration. WLWH were diagnosed 20 ± 4 years ago, were on cART for 123 ± 37 months and 80% had HIV plasma viral load <40 copies/mL. For women ≥50 years (n = 61), total hip aBMD T-Score was lower among WLWH than controls. Adjusted distal radius trabecular BMD and thickness and distal tibia trabecular BMD and failure load were 8-19% lower in WLWH than controls (p < 0.05). Cortical BMD and area did not differ between groups at either site. Lifetime cART duration and current plasma viral load were not associated with bone outcomes in WLWH; however, previous treatment with tenofovir was negatively associated with distal radius trabecular BMD and trabecular number and LS aBMD T-score. WLWH have compromised BMD, bone microarchitecture and strength vs. controls of similar age and reproductive status. Treatment with tenofovir may contribute to bone deficits in WLWH.
Population-based incident fracture data aid fracture prevention and therapy decisions. Our purpose was to describe 10-year site-specific cumulative fracture incidence by sex, age at baseline, and degree of trauma with/without consideration of competing mortality in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study adult cohort. Incident fractures and mortality were identified by annual postal questionnaires to the participant or proxy respondent. Date, site and circumstance of fracture were gathered from structured interviews and medical records. Fracture analyses were stratified by sex and age at baseline and used both Kaplan-Meier and competing mortality methods. The baseline (1995-97) cohort included 6314 women and 2789 men (aged 25-84 years; mean±SD 62±12 and 59±14, respectively), with 4322 (68%) women and 1732 (62%) men followed to year-10. At least one incident fracture occurred for 930 women (14%) and 247 men (9%). Competing mortality exceeded fracture risk for men aged 65+years at baseline. Age was a strong predictor of incident fractures especially fragility fractures, with higher age gradients for women vs. men. Major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hip, clinical spine, forearm, humerus) accounted for 41-74% of fracture risk by sex/age strata; in women all MOF sites showed age-related increases but in men only hip was clearly age-related. The most common fractures were the forearm for women and the ribs for men. Hip fracture incidence was the highest for the 75-84 year baseline age-group with no significant difference between women 7.0% (95% CI 5.3, 8.9) and men 7.0% (95% CI 4.4, 10.3). There are sex differences in the predominant sites and age-gradients of fracture. In older men, competing mortality exceeds cumulative fracture risk.
Physical activity (PA) is an important modifiable risk factor for both bone mineral density (BMD) and body mass index (BMI). However, BMI is itself strongly predictive of BMD. Our aim was to determine the association between PA and BMD, with consideration of BMI as a potential mediating factor. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) is a population-based prospective cohort study of Canadian women and men. PA was determined from interviewer-administered questionnaires at baseline and Year 5 and summarized as daily energy expenditure in total metabolic equivalents of the task multiplied by minutes/day (MET*m/d). Height, weight, and total hip and lumbar spine BMD were measured at baseline and Year 5. General linear models assessed relationships between PA and BMD, both cross-sectionally (baseline PA with baseline BMD) and longitudinally (average PA and change in PA with change in BMD). BMI was considered as a mediating factor. Potential confounders included age, center, education, caffeine intake, alcohol exposure, smoking history, history of weight-cycling, age at menarche, past use of oral contraceptives, history of >3 months missed menstruation, menopausal status, and antiresorptive use, as relevant. The study included 2855 men and 6442 women. PA was inversely associated with BMI at baseline, and an increase in PA between baseline and Year 5 was associated with a decrease in BMI, with 0.41 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.60) kg/m(2) loss per 1000 MET*m/d increase (in men) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.57) kg/m(2) loss per 1000 MET*m/d increase (in women). BMI was strongly associated with BMD, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. However, increased PA was associated with a small increase in total hip BMD, 0.004 (95% CI: 0.000-0.008) g/cm(2) per 1000 MET*m/d (in men) and 0.003 (95% CI: 0.000-0.007) g/cm(2) per 1000 MET*m/d (in women). Average PA was associated with an increase in lumbar spine BMD in women, but not in men; it was not associated with change in total hip BMD in either sex. Increased PA is associated with an increase in BMD and a concomitant decrease in BMI. These findings suggest that population-level interventions to increase PA would favorably impact bone and other health outcomes.
Striking geographic variation in the incidence of osteoporotic fracture has been shown in national and international studies. The contributing risk factors for this variation are not fully understood. To determine the geographic variation of bone mineral density (BMD) values, prevalent low-trauma fracture, prior falls, and vertebral deformity and to determine how this variation is related to the geographic variation of incident low-trauma fracture. We studied incident fracture among 2484 men and 6093 women ages 50 and older from CaMos, a randomly-selected population-based longitudinal cohort recruited from within 50 kilometers of nine cities across Canada. Analyses included up to an eight-year follow-up. Estimates of fracture incidence are all age-standardized and given per 1000 person-years and CI denotes confidence interval. Among men, the lowest incidence of low-trauma fracture was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.1-7.5) in Quebec and the highest was 11.9 (95% CI: 7.1-18.6) in Calgary, compared with an overall incidence of 7.2 (95% CI: 5.8-8.7). Among women, the lowest incidence of low-trauma fracture was 11.5 (95% CI: 8.5-15.1) in Halifax and the highest was 18.5 (95% CI: 14.6-23.3) in Calgary, compared with an overall incidence of 15.3 (95% CI: 14.1-16.7). The regional variation in low-trauma fractures was similar to variation in hip fracture incidence among women (Pearson correlation, r=0.46 to 0.76) but not men (r=-0.06 to 0.05). We noted significant geographic variation in the prevalence of low BMD, as defined by BMD T-score< or =-2.5, however this variation was not directly related to low-trauma fractures or other risk factors. Furthermore, a model including age, BMD, falls, vertebral deformity, and prior clinical fracture was a good predictor of geographic variation of low-trauma fracture incidence in both men (r=0.66) and women (r=0.84). For both men and women, the burden of low-trauma fracture is not related to the prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by BMD, but is related to a more comprehensive assessment of fracture age, BMD, falls, prior fracture, and vertebral deformity.