Fertility Awareness Methods

Ovulation method of natural family planning

Connell-Tatum EB

Published November 1981 Fertility and Sterility, 36(5), 551-552
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45849-8 PMID 7308500

RRM Academy Synopsis

Many motivated women can detect ovulation by cervical mucus

Many motivated women can judge ovulation reasonably well from cervical mucus. A 1981 review reports this from World Health Organization studies of 869 women in 5 countries. Learning the method demands considerable teaching time and motivation.

Key Findings

  • The World Health Organization studies enrolled 869 women with varied backgrounds across 5 countries and examined both teaching and effectiveness of natural family planning.
  • The data indicate that many women who are motivated can reasonably accurately identify ovulation by observing cervical mucus quality (the Billings method). Teaching takes considerable time and motivation.
  • Past methods relied on calendar calculations, basal body temperature, test strips, electronic devices and computer tools. Each aims to separate the fertile and infertile parts of the cycle.
  • The review names freedom from drugs and devices as the advantage. It lists demands on couples' sex lives and an association between failures and higher congenital abnormality rates as disadvantages.

Interpretation

Only the published abstract is available, so this synopsis reflects the abstract alone. The abstract describes a narrative review of World Health Organization work on how women are taught natural family planning and how well it works. The author says long-term, detailed data are still needed to judge these methods. The link with congenital abnormalities appears without figures.

RRM Context

Watching cervical mucus is a core skill in fertility awareness-based methods such as the Billings method. The World Health Organization work shows women in five countries learning to track their own cycle signs. That kind of body literacy underlies restorative reproductive medicine.

Abstract

Past practices of Natural Family Planning (NFP) have included such techniques as: 1) calendar rhythm in which a constant mathematical relationship was calculated between the day of ovulation and the beginning of the succeeding menstrual period, 2) temperature rhythm in which sexual intercourse is permitted by observing that the basal body temperature rises at the time of ovulation, 3) a combination of calendar and temperature rhythm methods, 4) paper test strips which measure glucose and electrolytes in vaginal secretions, 5) electronic devices of various sorts which record changes in the potentials of the pelvic organs at the time of ovulation, and 6) recent developments in computer technology which measure a number of variables. All of these techniques depend upon the identification of the fertile and infertile periods of the menstrual cycle. More recent studies by the World Health Organization have analyzed the teaching phase of NFP and the effectiveness phase of NFP using the detection of ovulation by following changes in the quality of cervical mucus. These studies tested 869 women with varied backgrounds in 5 countries. The data support the fact that many motivated women can detect ovulation reasonably accurately by following changes in their cervical mucus (the Billings method), although teaching time and motivation are considerable. Long-term and detailed data are necessary to determine the value of these methods. The advantage of NFP is the avoidance of drugs and devices. Disadvantages are that demands are placed on the sex life of couples, and there are associations between failures and increased rates of congenital abnormalities.

Read the guide

  • The Billings Ovulation Method (Billings Method)

    The Billings Ovulation Method uses only cervical mucus to identify the fertile window. Learn how it works, what the evidence shows, and its value in restorative reproductive medicine.

    12 min read

Topics

Related research

Fertility Awareness › Methods › Billings Ovulation Method · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Cervical Mucus
Elizabeth B. Connell-Tatum
Liz Connell-Tatum, Beth Connell-Tatum, Betsy Connell-Tatum, E Connell-Tatum
PMID 7308500 7308500 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45849-8 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45849-8 Connell-Tatum et al. 1981, Connell-Tatum 1981