Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee et al., 2024·Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand - RTAC
RTAC Code of Practice (Issue 9) governing accreditation requirements for reproductive technology units operating in Australia and New Zealand. Sets standards for clinical, laboratory, and quality-management practices that ART centres must meet to remain RTAC-accredited and eligible to submit cycles to ANZARD. Includes patient safety, embryology laboratory, donor-program, and incident-reporting requirements. Effective from December 2024.
Guidelines by Clinical Area · Fertility and Infertility Guidelines
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the Society for Reproductive Biologists and Technologists (SRBT). Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org, 2022·Fertility and sterility
This document is a comprehensive guidance for human embryology, andrology, and endocrinology laboratories. Universal guidance applicable to all laboratories includes requirements and recommendations for accreditation and staffing in the United States, and specific guidance is included for each laboratory specialty.
Guidelines by Clinical Area · Fertility and Infertility Guidelines
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine et al., 2021·Fertility and sterility
This document is designed to provide a framework for assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs that meet or exceed the requirements suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for certification of ART laboratories. This document replaces the document "Revised Minimum Standards for Practices Offering Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Committee Opinion" published in 2019.
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY·
The structured protocols used to train and certify FertilityCare Practitioners (FCPs) in the uniform delivery of CrMS instruction are detailed, covering the sequence of follow-up sessions, the use of standardized teaching aids, and quality-control mechanisms that ensure inter-instructor consistency. Standardization is essential to the scientific validity of CrMS data, because chart comparability across practitioners and study populations depends on identical observation and recording conventions.