Bone Health Bone Mineral Density

Recovery of BMD after pregnancy and breastfeeding-a 10-yr prospective observational study of 25-yr-old women

Egund L, Malmgren L, Woolf AD, McGuigan FE, Akesson KE

Published November 29, 2025 Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 40(12), 1360-1369
DOI 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf087 PMID 40581742 PMC PMC12685719

RRM Academy Synopsis

Bone density recovers after pregnancy and breastfeeding in young women

Women with children had bone density at 35 no lower than women without children, a prospective study of 683 Swedish women found. Short-term fluctuations in hip bone density were associated with recent pregnancy and weaning. Women who had weaned longer before their scan had smaller hip bone losses.

Key Findings

  • Hip bone density at 35 did not differ between women with and without a pregnancy completed since age 25; spine density was 2.1% higher in those with one (p = .043).
  • At age 35, bone density at the femoral neck, total hip and spine was not substantially different between women who breastfed and non-lactating women, regardless of cumulative breastfeeding duration.
  • In women within 12 months after their last pregnancy, total hip bone density was 4% lower than in women more than 36 months after theirs (p = .054; p adjusted = .032).
  • Cumulative breastfeeding beyond 15 months was associated with larger losses than in non-lactating women: 4.3% of femoral neck and 3.7% of total hip bone density between ages 25 and 35.
  • Femoral neck bone density had fallen 6.6% since age 25 in women weaned within 6 months of the scan, against 1.7% in women weaned more than 24 months earlier (p < .001).

Interpretation

PEAK-25 is a prospective cohort of Malmö women, scanned at age 25 and again 10 years later. Women with no children at 25 formed the analysis group and reported pregnancies and breastfeeding by questionnaire. The follow-up response rate was 75%. Across the cohort, femoral neck and total hip bone density fell between ages 25 and 35 whether or not women had children, while spine density was stable or rose slightly. Differences between breastfeeding-duration groups diminished when women who had weaned within 6 months of the scan were excluded. The authors note that the findings may not extend to settings with different nutrition, maternal care or breastfeeding patterns.

RRM Context

Restorative Reproductive Medicine starts from the view that a woman's body is built to work and to recover. That includes recovery after the demands of pregnancy and breastfeeding. Bone is one place where that recovery shows. A whole-life view of women's health keeps bone in the picture alongside ovulation, fertility and pregnancy.

Abstract

Pregnancy and lactation require large amounts of calcium, potentially depleting the young-adult bone. This study investigated BMD and fluctuations of BMD resulting from parity and lactation in the PEAK-25 cohort, a prospective observational study of women all aged 25 at inclusion and 35 at follow-up. The analyses used women who were nulliparous at baseline and parous (n = 573) or nulliparous (n = 177) 10 yr later. Parity, regardless of number of pregnancies, had no negative impact; indeed, spine BMD at age 35 was higher (2.1%; p = .043). Likewise, BMD did not differ in women who breastfed, were nonlactating or nulliparous. Even the cumulative duration of breastfeeding did not make a difference. Overall, regardless of parity, in the cohort, by age 35 BMD was already decreasing, with overall losses at the FN (∆, -3.4%) and TH (∆, -2.7%), although not the spine (∆, 0.9%). Yet, BMD fluctuations associated with pregnancy, lactation, and weaning were seen in the short term. Comparing those pregnant >24 mo with those <24 mo prior to DXA, BMD was lowest in women more recently pregnant (FN, -2.2%, TH -2.7%). Women pregnant within 12 mo had 4% lower TH BMD compared with more than 36 mo (p = .054, padjusted = .032). Cumulative duration of breastfeeding was associated with bone loss, particularly beyond 15 mo (FN: ∆, -4.3%; TH: ∆, -3.7%) and lower spine BMD accretion. Despite such periods of loss, BMD recovers, evidenced by time-from-weaning to DXA. Women weaning within 6 mo of measurement had lower FN BMD than those where the interval was >24 mo (6.6% vs 1.7%; p < .001). In conclusion and despite repeated fluctuations in BMD resulting from the physiological demands of multiple pregnancies and periods of breastfeeding, BMD recovers and ultimately does not differ from that of identically aged women without children.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Bone Health › Bone Mineral Density › Peak Bone Mass · Postpartum › Recovery › Lactation
Lisa Egund, Linnea Malmgren, Anthony D Woolf, Fiona E McGuigan, Kristina E Akesson
L Egund, L Malmgren, Tony Woolf, A Woolf, F McGuigan, K Akesson
PMID 40581742 40581742 DOI 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf087 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf087 Egund et al. 2025, Egund 2025