restorative-reproductive-medicine/adjunct-and-emerging-therapies/platelet-rich-plasma-and-regenerative-approaches infections-and-microbiome/chronic-endometritis/treatment-of-chronic-endometritisinfertility/uterine-factor/endometrial-receptivity
Chen X et al., 2025 · Frontiers in immunology
[BACKGROUND] Chronic endometritis (CE) has been widely recognized as a potential cause of infertility, however, access to effective treatment is a formidable challenge due to the rudimentary understanding of the pathogenesis of persistent CE. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment on pregnancy outcomes and the endometrial microenvironment in patients with persistent CE. [METHODS] A total of 89 infertility patients were selected, including 56 non-CE (as the control group) and 33 persistent CE. The persistent CE patients received an intrauterine infusion of PRP four times before embryo transfer. Immunohistochemistry staining and transcriptomic sequencing were used to investigate the uterine-specific role of PRP in patients with persistent CE. [RESULTS] The implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were significantly increased in the cured CE group compared to the non-cured CE group. After PRP treatment, the proportions of endometrial CD8+ T cells, CD56+ NK cells, Foxp3+ Treg cells, and T-bet+ Th1 cells were significantly decreased in patients with persistent CE. Specifically, DEG analysis showed that genes implicated in endometrial receptivity-related and antimicrobial were upregulated and genes involved in the immune response processes were downregulated in cured CE patients after PRP treatment. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that the effects of changes in leukocyte chemotaxis-related genes played a critical role in the endometrial immune environment. [CONCLUSIONS] Autologous PRP treatment has been shown as a potentially successful therapy for improving pregnancy outcomes by reconstructing the uterine local immune microenvironment to improve endometrial receptivity in patients with persistent CE.
infections-and-microbiome/chronic-endometritis/treatment-of-chronic-endometritis infertility/uterine-factor/endometrial-receptivityrestorative-reproductive-medicine/adjunct-and-emerging-therapies/platelet-rich-plasma-and-regenerative-approaches
Boychuk AV et al., 2024 · Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960)
[OBJECTIVE] of our study was to improve the pregravid preparation of women with chronic endometritis to develop individual approaches to overcoming infertility, taking into account the state of endometrium. [PATIENTS AND METHODS] The study included 90 women (main group, n=90), 28 to 38 years with an anatomically normal uterus and chronic endometritis (CE). Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I - 45 women with CE who received conventional treatment; group II - 45 women with CE who received pregravid preparation by subendometrial injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP). [RESULTS] At the first stage of study, the ART statistical reports from 2015 to 2022 were analyzed at the Medical Center of Reproductive Health ≪Damia≫, (Ivano-Frankivsk). Analysis of the vaginal flora parameters before treatment at the first stage revealed the presence of conditionally pathogenic flora in culture from the cervical canal (Candida albicans - 2.4%, Escherihia coli - 4.8%, Staphylococcus epidermidis - 6.2% Enterococcus faecalis - 6.9%), and was evidence of a possible recurrence of inflammation during gestation. In the age category, the groups of patients were homogeneous, with no significant differences by the level of AMH and the level of CD 138. Biochemical pregnancy be present in 20 patients (44.4%) of group I and 28 (62.2%) of group II. Fertility within a year after the end of therapy was restored with the proposed method of therapy in most women (51.1%), in the comparison group this number was 11.1% lower. Pregnancy rate between the groups (I and II) did not differ significantly. The number of live births in group II - 19 births (42.2%) - was 2 times higher than I group (9 (20.0%), P<0.05). The most common complication for women in the comparison groups was early pregnancy loss. Among 18 (40.0%) clinical pregnancies of group I, 8 women (17.8%) had early miscarriage, 1 ectopic pregnancy (2.2%), while in group II clinical pregnancy be present in 23 women (51.1%). The number of terminated pregnancies was two times lower than in the first group (8.9% vs. 17.8%, P<0.05). [CONCLUSION] Chronic endometritis is one of the main causes of pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization. Patients of the second group were treated with the proposed method of subendometrial injections with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), prepared from autologous blood, is an effective method of preparing the endometrium for embryo transfer and can increase the number of live births in patients with chronic endometritis.
diagnostics/endometrial-assessment/luteal-phase-biopsy clinical-guidelines/guideline-appraisal/evidence-base-and-strength-of-recommendationgynecology/clinical-practice/practice-patterns
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2026 · Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
RCOG response (July 2026) to the NICE draft early-use guidance on Endotest and EndoSure. Underlines that it is draft guidance for consultation, not final approval. Notes Endotest's high reported accuracy comes from carefully selected groups of women with long-standing pelvic pain already at high risk of endometriosis, largely in specialist centres, with most evidence from teams linked to the test's developer in France; robust independent validation in other countries, age and ethnic groups and routine pathways including primary care is limited and urgently needed. Considers EndoSure experimental: near-perfect performance claims arise mainly from small developer-led studies, and both the biological mechanism and real-world performance are unvalidated. Supports linking early use to structured evidence generation.
assisted-reproduction/add-ons-and-adjuncts/adjunct-evidence-base therapeutics/prescribing-safety/off-label-prescribinginfertility/uterine-factor/endometrial-receptivity
Pan Z et al., 2026 · Frontiers in endocrinology
[OBJECTIVE] The role of intrauterine PRP infusion in managing recurrent implantation failure (RIF) remains controversial despite its emerging clinical use. This systematic review aims to evaluate its therapeutic potential in RIF patients and further to investigate variations in outcomes based on transfer cycle type, embryo developmental stage, RIF diagnostic criteria, and endometrial thickness. [METHODS] We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating PRP treatment for RIF patients from the beginning of the database to May 2025. [RESULTS] This meta-analysis showed that PRP administration significantly improved clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) [OR = 3.18, 95%CI (2.45, 4.14), I2 = 3%], biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR) [OR = 2.84, 95%CI (2.22, 3.63), I2 = 0%], ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) [OR = 3.41, 95%CI (2.08, 5.60), I2 = 30%] and live birth rate (LBR) [OR=5.10, 95%CI (1.95, 13.37), I2 = 75%] in women with RIF. However, PRP intrauterine infusion did not reduce miscarriage rate (MR). Notably, the preterm birth rate was significantly higher in the PRP group compared to controls [OR = 8.24, 95%CI (2.09, 32.41), I2 = 0%]. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PRP improved CPR, BPR and LBR in both the fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Additionally, while PRP increased CPR, LBR and reduced MR in blastocyst transfers [CPR OR = 3.84, 95%CI (2.82, 5.23), I2 = 0%; LBR OR = 7.32, 95%CI (3.17, 16.90), I2 = 63%; MR OR = 0.27, 95%CI (0.07, 0.96), I2 = 54%], these effects were not observed in cleavage-stage embryo transfers. Moreover, PRP administration associated with a higher CPR [OR = 3.84, 95%CI (2.82, 5.23), I2 = 0%], OPR[OR = 4.13, 95%CI (1.79, 9.56), I2 = 48%], LBR [OR = 7.32, 95%CI (3.17, 16.90), I2 = 63%] and a lower MR [OR = 0.27, 95%CI (0.07, 0.96), I2 = 54%] in women with ≥3 prior implantation failure, it did not confer the same benefit to those with a history of ≥2 failed cycles. [CONCLUSION] These findings suggest a possible beneficial role for PRP on pregnancy outcomes to some extent in women with RIF, particularly in cases with ≥3 prior failed transfers, and blastocyst transfer may increase LBR and reduce miscarriage risk. However, further investigation is warranted to determine whether this treatment may pose an increased risk of preterm birth. [SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251061511.