Fifteen years have passed since our group first proposed the use of clomiphene citrate as an ovulation-inducing agent. Our 15-year experience with over 2,000 patients has not dampened our enthusiasm for this drug. The benefits have far outweighted the minor side effects or the possibility of multiple births. Serious birth defects were minimal and have been no greater than what one may expect in the general population. Clomiphene citrate has been a boon to womankind and deserves the confidence of both patient and physician: it is a drug with a record of utility and with but minor risks.
Asch, R. H., & Greenblatt, R. B. (1976). Update on the safety and efficacy of clomiphene citrate as a therapeutic agent. The Journal of reproductive medicine, 17(3), 175-180.
Asch RH, Greenblatt RB. Update on the safety and efficacy of clomiphene citrate as a therapeutic agent. J Reprod Med. 1976;17(3):175-180.
Asch, R. H., and Robert B. Greenblatt. "Update on the safety and efficacy of clomiphene citrate as a therapeutic agent." The Journal of reproductive medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, 1976, pp. 175-180.
To determine patterns of usage of clomiphene citrate (CC) by primary care providers (obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians, and other providers) within University of Utah Community Clinics. We performed a retrospective chart review (n = 79) and followup telephone survey of patients (n = 43) who were prescribed CC in the University of Utah Community Clinics in 2006. Most women who were prescribed CC had appropriate indications for therapy (65% with a diagnosis related to irregular menses and 33% with a diagnosis of female infertility), but there was variable and inconsistent monitoring of ovulation (much of which was apparently initiated by the patients). In the interview, 24 of the women (56%) said they would be fine having twins, and 14 (33%) said they would prefer to have twins if possible. In this primary care setting, clomiphene was prescribed for appropriate indications, but the monitoring of treatment could be improved. The preference of some patients for twin gestations represents a challenge for optimum clinical care and public health.
Induction of ovulation is indicated for anovulatory and amenorrheic women as well as for women who have an inadequate luteal phase. It is also indicated as a strategy for recruiting multiple follicles for women with unexplained infertility and those who are undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. The use of various agents and detection of ovulation are described. This includes a discussion of clomiphene citrate, bromocriptine, human menopausal gonadotropins, urinary follicle stimulating hormone and pulsatile gonadotropin releasing hormone therapy. Regimens, success rates and potential complications of each form of therapy are reviewed. Also discussed is the use of combination therapy and partial ovarian destruction.
Reimão Miller KA et al., 2026·Reproductive biomedicine online
This review explores whether the clomiphene citrate stair-step protocol (SSP) for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) outperforms the traditional protocol. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE and Google Scholar from inception to 15 June 2025, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with PROSPERO registration (CRD420251050294). Of 847 screened records, five randomized controlled trials were included (n = 520: n = 255; traditional protocol: n = 265). Analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.4 using random-effects models. Risk ratios, mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed with I², risk of bias with RoB2, certainty with GRADE and robustness with leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The SSP increased ovulation rates compared with the traditional protocol (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.49; five randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n = 520, I² = 0%). Clinical pregnancy also favoured SSP (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.05; four RCTs, n = 460; I² = 0%), although this result was largely driven by one study. The SSP shortened treatment duration (mean difference -32.59 days, 95% CI -38.66 to -26.52 days; three RCTs, n = 320, I² = 83%). Endometrial thickness was similar (mean difference 0.32 mm, 95% CI -0.95 to 1.59 mm; four RCTs, n = 460, I² = 91%). SSP improves ovulation rate and shortens treatment without affecting endometrial thickness and may increase clinical pregnancy rates.
Clomiphene citrate (CC) is the first-line medication for inducing ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, approximately 20% of patients with PCOS are resistant to CC. This study aims to identify reliable baseline predictors of CC resistance in infertile women with PCOS. A post-hoc analysis of a large, multicenter randomized controlled trial (PCOSAct trial) conducted in China. The current analysis comprised the 471 participants who were randomized to the active CC arm and completed the requisite follow-up. To identify potential candidate variables, we employed multivariable logistic and LASSO regression analyses. Within the framework of a multivariable logistic regression model, we also estimated the independent associations between the identified candidate variables and resistance to CC. Additionally, we plotted the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and utilized the DeLong method to compare the statistical differences in the area under the curve (AUC). Finally, we constructed a restricted cubic spline (RCS) logistic regression model to illustrate the dose-response relationship between continuous predictor variables and CC resistance. CC resistance was identified in 32 (6.8%) participants. Body Mass Index (BMI), Total Testosterone (TT), and Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) were useful predictors of ovarian response to CC. The "T+BMI" dual-factor model demonstrated high discriminative power (AUC = 0.801) and was statistically comparable to the three-factor model including AMH (AUC = 0.818; P = 0.347). TT was the strongest individual predictor (OR = 2.73 per 1-unit), while BMI was the most significant modifiable risk factor (OR = 2.49 per 1-SD). A simplified "T + BMI" assessment provides comparable prognostic utility without the need for AMH testing. For patients at high risk of CC resistance, we recommend upfront use of aromatase inhibitors or low-dose gonadotropins. This strategy avoids ineffective treatment cycles and enables personalized ovulation induction. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identification number NCT01573858 on July 6, 2012.