Assisted Reproduction · Outcomes and Effectiveness

Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting

Feinberg EC, Larsen FW, Catherino WH, Zhang J, Armstrong AY

Published April 2006 Fertility and sterility, 85(4), 888-94
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.028 PMID 16580370

Abstract

Objective

Racial disparity in assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been reported but remains controversial. Reasons for the disparity are unclear, and access to care has been suggested as a causative factor. In this study, we sought to examine minority utilization of ART in the Department of Defense (DoD) compared with minority utilization in the U.S. ART population. Outcomes from ART were compared between Caucasian (Cau) and African American (AA) patients, and etiologies of disparity were examined.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

University-based ART program.

Patients

A total of 1,457 patients undergoing first-cycle fresh, nondonor ART.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, spontaneous abortion rate.

Results

Within the DoD population, AA women had a fourfold increase in utilization of ART services relative to the U.S. ART population. In this equal-access-to-care setting, AA women experienced a clinically significant decrease in live birth rate that did not reach statistical significance (29.6% vs. 35.8%, risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.02) and a statistically significant increase in spontaneous abortions compared with Cau women (25% vs. 15.9%, RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.36). This might be explained, in part, by a higher prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in AA women (30.8% AA vs. 10.7% Cau, RR 2.85, 95% CI 2.06-3.95). For both AA and Cau women, the presence of fibroids at baseline ultrasound was associated with reductions in clinical pregnancy rates (35% with leiomyomas vs. 43.2% without leiomyomas, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-0.98), live birth rates (26.2% vs. 36.0%, RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90), and implantation rates (25.6% vs. 31.1% RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98).

Conclusions

Utilization of ART services among AA women increased when access to care was improved. A clinically significant reduction in live birth rate and statistically significant increase in spontaneous abortion rate was observed in AA women compared with Cau women. Leiomyomas were three times more prevalent in AA women and reduced ART success, regardless of race. The persistence of racial differences in an equal-access-to-care environment might be explained, in part, by the increased prevalence of leiomyomas in AA women.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Assisted Reproduction › Outcomes and Effectiveness › Live Birth Rates · Cost and Access › Access and Coverage › Insurance Coverage
Eve C. Feinberg, Jun Zhang
E Feinberg, J Zhang
PMID 16580370 16580370 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.028 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.028 Feinberg et al. 2006, Feinberg 2006