Assisted Reproduction · Outcomes and Effectiveness
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Although racial and ethnic disparities in adverse birth outcomes have been well documented, it is unknown whether such disparities diminish in women who use medically assisted reproduction (MAR). We examined differences in the association between maternal race and ethnicity and adverse birth outcomes among women who conceived spontaneously and those who used MAR, including assisted reproduction technology (ART), eg, in-vitro fertilization, and also non-ART MAR, eg, fertility drugs.
Methods
We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data on all singleton births (N = 7 545 805) in the United States from 2016 to 2017. The outcomes included neonatal and fetal death, preterm birth, and serious neonatal morbidity, among others. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and to assess the interactions between race and ethnicity and mode of conception.
Results
Overall, 93 469 (1.3%) singletons were conceived by MAR. Neonatal mortality was twofold higher among infants of non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White women in the spontaneous-conception group (aRR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.8-1.9), whereas in the ART-conception group, neonatal mortality was more than fourfold higher in infants of non-Hispanic Black women (aRR = 4.1, 95% CI: 2.9-5.9). Racial and ethnic disparities between Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White women were also significantly larger among women who conceived using MAR with regard to preterm birth (<34 weeks) and perinatal mortality.
Conclusions
Compared to women who conceived spontaneously, racial and ethnic disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes were larger in women who used MAR. More research is needed to identify preventive measures for reducing risks among vulnerable women who use medically assisted reproduction.
Topics
By this author
Mid-Cycle Pain in Endometriosis: Clinical Correlations and Potential Etiological Factors
Rojas HE et al., 2026 · Journal of women's health (2002)
To characterize differences between individuals with and without mid-cycle pain in a registry cohort with endometriosis. Prospective analysis of data from the Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort Data Registry (Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02911090) at a tertiary referral center in Western Canada. Three hundred forty-five individuals aged 18-49 years who: (1) had at least one episode of menstrual bleeding in the last 3 months, (2) attended a baseline initial visit, and (3) subsequently had surgery with histological confirmation of endometriosis between January 2018 and December 2023. Exclusion criteria included (1) previous hysterectomy; (2) hormonal suppressive therapy use in the last 3 months; and (3) missing data on mid-cycle pain, history of hormonal therapy use, or menstrual cycle regularity. N/A. Mid-cycle pain in the last month versus No mid-cycle pain in the last month. Of the 345 participants, 67% (n = 232) reported mid-cycle pain in the last month. Mid-cycle pain in the last month was significantly associated with higher mean Central Sensitization Inventory score (48 ± 17 versus 36 ± 16, p < 0.001) and more months of prior hormonal suppressive therapy use (58 [14-120] versus 26 [0-109], p = 0.012). Abnormal anatomy at the time of surgery (e.g., endometrioma, ovarian adhesions) was not associated with mid-cycle pain in the last month. In this endometriosis cohort at a tertiary referral center, most participants reported mid-cycle pain in the last month, which was associated with central sensitization but was not clearly related to endometriosis anatomical distortion.
Effectiveness · Comparative Effectiveness
Validating ovulation prediction and confirmation with the Mira monitor: blinded ultrasound and serum hormone comparison
Bouchard TP et al., 2026 · Reproductive biomedicine online · Free to read
Do quantitative urinary hormone measurements on the Mira monitor predict and confirm ovulation accurately compared with ultrasound in women with regular menstrual cycles? Do Mira urine hormones correlate with serum hormones? This was a prospective, single-centre, blinded diagnostic accuracy study with 52 women aged 19-44 years with regular cycles (24-38 days) who tracked 153 cycles over 18 months. Daily first-morning urine was tested with the Mira monitor for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), oestrone-3-glucuronide (E13G), luteinizing hormone (LH) and pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG). Serial transvaginal ultrasounds (890 scans) confirmed the day of ovulation. Serum hormones were measured twice per cycle. The 121 ovulatory cycles from 49 participants with sufficient index test and reference standard data were included in the final analysis. The Mira LH peak day strongly predicted ultrasound-confirmed ovulation (R² = 0.96, P < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.971), with 96% of ovulations occurring within ±1 day. The Mira PDG increase was also strongly associated with ultrasound-confirmed day of ovulation (R² = 0.87, P < 0.001). First-morning urine hormones were significantly associated with serum hormones when collected within 90 min (LH: R² = 0.92; E13G: R² = 0.73; R² = 0.61; R² = 0.75). Anovulatory cycles were identified in 11% of regularly cycling participants. Quantitative urinary hormone monitoring with the Mira monitor provides accurate prediction and confirmation of ovulation, with strong urine-serum associations supporting reduced reliance on serial serum draws in select patients. These findings support clinical adoption of quantitative urinary fertility monitoring.
Early Pregnancy · Miscarriage
Impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on reproductive outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss
Balachandran S et al., 2026 · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reproductive outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and the influence of material and social deprivation on these outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included RPL patients seen at a specialized clinic between March 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on care period: pre-pandemic (March 1, 2018-February 29, 2020) and pandemic (March 1, 2020-February 28, 2022). Cumulative probabilities of birth were estimated using the cumulative incidence function within a competing risk framework, treating pregnancy loss as a competing event. Fine and Gray regression models calculated sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) of birth. 544 patients were included in the study, with 255 in the pre-pandemic group and 289 in the pandemic group. Individuals in the pandemic group were less likely to achieve pregnancy than those in the pre-pandemic group (relative risk = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 - 0.66). Among those who conceived, the cumulative probability of live birth was 0.77 in both groups. Relative to individuals residing in high-social deprivation neighborhoods, those living in moderately deprived areas had higher sub-distribution hazards of live birth (adjusted sHR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.10; P = 0.003). Within specialized RPL care and a universal maternity care system, pregnancy rates were lower during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, among those who conceived, the probability of achieving a live birth remained similar between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
Ultrasound · Follicular Monitoring
Using corpus luteum formation with dominant follicle collapse to improve the criteria for identifying ovulation
Bouchard TP et al., 2026 · Reproductive biomedicine online · Free to read
Does formation of the corpus luteum help to identify the day of ovulation on ultrasound when follicular collapse is missed, and how reliable are sonographers versus a review panel in identifying the day of ovulation on ultrasound? Sonographers in a clinic in Canada performed serial endovaginal ultrasound scans (six to eight per cycle) to identify the day of ovulation in regularly cycling women (n = 40) who were followed for one to five cycles (n = 85). The day of ovulation was identified by: (i) identification of the dominant follicle; (ii) disappearance of the dominant follicle; and (iii) identification and dating of the corpus luteum. The main outcome measures were inter-rater reliability between two sonographers, and Bland-Altman agreement between the supervising sonographer and a panel that reviewed each scan to identify the day of ovulation. Of the 85 menstrual cycles reviewed, two cycles did not have sufficient data to date ovulation, one cycle showed an incidental dermoid cyst, and 11 cycles showed anovulatory patterns. This left a total of 71 cycles (84%) for which intra-rater reliability between two sonographers for identifying the day of ovulation was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, P < 0.0001), and Bland-Altman agreement showed no significant difference in the estimated day of ovulation between the supervising sonographer and the panel (t = -0.28, P = 0.78). Corpus luteum criteria were necessary to help identify the day of ovulation in 14 of 71 cycles (20%). The estimated day of ovulation can be determined reliably on ultrasound by trained sonographers using collapse of the dominant follicle and formation of the corpus luteum based on six to eight scans per cycle.
Related research
Outcomes and Effectiveness · Live Birth Rates
Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review
Humphries LA et al., 2016 · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the influence of race and ethnicity on clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF).StudyWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, POPLINE, and Cochrane Central, and hand-searched relevant articles published through July 22, 2015.Study appraisal and synthesis methodsTwo reviewers independently evaluated abstracts to identify studies that compared clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates for ≥2 racial and/or ethnic groups after nondonor IVF cycles. Twenty-four studies were included. All 5 US registry-based studies showed that black, Hispanic, and Asian women had lower clinical pregnancy rates and/or live birth rates after IVF, compared with white women. Similarly, most clinic-specific studies reported significant disparities in these primary outcomes, potentially attributable to differences in infertility diagnosis, spontaneous abortion, and obesity. Studies varied with respect to definitions of race/ethnicity, inclusion of first cycles vs multiple cycles for individual women, and collected covariates. Most studies were limited by sample size, inadequate adjustment for confounding, selection bias, and extensive missing data. Although current evidence points to race and ethnicity, especially black race, as strong predictors of poorer outcomes after IVF, the utility of results is constrained by the limitations described.
Outcomes and Effectiveness · Live Birth Rates
Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting
Feinberg EC et al., 2006 · Fertility and sterility
Racial disparity in assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been reported but remains controversial. Reasons for the disparity are unclear, and access to care has been suggested as a causative factor. In this study, we sought to examine minority utilization of ART in the Department of Defense (DoD) compared with minority utilization in the U.S. ART population. Outcomes from ART were compared between Caucasian (Cau) and African American (AA) patients, and etiologies of disparity were examined. Retrospective cohort study. University-based ART program. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,457 patients undergoing first-cycle fresh, nondonor ART. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, spontaneous abortion rate. RESULT(S): Within the DoD population, AA women had a fourfold increase in utilization of ART services relative to the U.S. ART population. In this equal-access-to-care setting, AA women experienced a clinically significant decrease in live birth rate that did not reach statistical significance (29.6% vs. 35.8%, risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.02) and a statistically significant increase in spontaneous abortions compared with Cau women (25% vs. 15.9%, RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.36). This might be explained, in part, by a higher prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in AA women (30.8% AA vs. 10.7% Cau, RR 2.85, 95% CI 2.06-3.95). For both AA and Cau women, the presence of fibroids at baseline ultrasound was associated with reductions in clinical pregnancy rates (35% with leiomyomas vs. 43.2% without leiomyomas, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-0.98), live birth rates (26.2% vs. 36.0%, RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90), and implantation rates (25.6% vs. 31.1% RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98). CONCLUSION(S): Utilization of ART services among AA women increased when access to care was improved. A clinically significant reduction in live birth rate and statistically significant increase in spontaneous abortion rate was observed in AA women compared with Cau women. Leiomyomas were three times more prevalent in AA women and reduced ART success, regardless of race. The persistence of racial differences in an equal-access-to-care environment might be explained, in part, by the increased prevalence of leiomyomas in AA women.
Safety and Risks · Neonatal and Birth Outcomes
Disparities in Obstetrical Outcomes in ART Pregnancies Compared with Natural Conceptions
Novak C et al., 2013 · Seminars in Reproductive Medicine
Health disparities are observed in all fields of medicine and reproductive health is not immune to this phenomenon. The incidence of women using infertility treatments to conceive is increasing. Women undergoing assisted reproduction appear to be at increased risk of adverse outcomes, and minority women tend to be at even greater risk. This article examines several adverse obstetrical outcomes including preterm birth, congenital malformations, and preeclampsia among women receiving infertility treatments compared with those who conceive spontaneously. It will further examine societal costs associated with these procedures.
Safety and Risks · Neonatal and Birth Outcomes
Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Pinborg A et al., 2013 · Human reproduction update
Assisted reproduction technology (ART) is used worldwide, at increasing rates, and data show that some adverse outcomes occur more frequently than following spontaneous conception (SC). Possible explanatory factors for the well-known adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons were evaluated. PubMed and Cochrane databases from 1982 to 2012 were searched. Studies using donor or frozen oocytes were excluded, as well as those with no control group or including <100 children. The main outcome measure was preterm birth (PTB defined as delivery <37 weeks of gestation), and a random effects model was used for meta-analyses of PTB. Other outcomes were very PTB, low-birthweight (LBW), very LBW, small for gestational age and perinatal mortality. The search returned 1255 articles and 65 of these met the inclusion criteria. The following were identified as predictors for PTB in singletons: SC in couples with time to pregnancy (TTP) > 1 year versus SC singletons in couples with TTP ≤ 1 year [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22, 1.50]; IVF/ICSI versus SC singletons from subfertile couples (TTP > 1 year; AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30, 1.85); conception after ovulation induction and/or intrauterine insemination versus SC singletons where TTP ≤ 1 year (AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.21, 1.74); IVF/ICSI singletons versus their non-ART singleton siblings (AOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08, 1.49). The risk of PTB in singletons with a 'vanishing co-twin' versus from a single gestation was AOR of 1.73 (95% CI 1.54, 1.94) in the narrative data. ICSI versus IVF (AOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93), and frozen embryo transfer versus fresh embryo transfer (AOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94) were associated with a lower risk of PTB. Subfertility is a major risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons, however, even in the same mother an ART singleton has a poorer outcome than the non-ART sibling; hence, factors related to the hormone stimulation and/or IVF methods per se also may play a part. Further research is required into mechanisms of epigenetic modification in human embryos and the effects of cryopreservation on this, whether milder ovarian stimulation regimens can improve embryo quality and endometrial conditions, and whether longer culture times for embryos has a negative influence on the perinatal outcome.
Assisted Reproduction › Outcomes and Effectiveness › Live Birth Rates · Pregnancy › Neonatal Outcomes › Neonatal Morbidity · Birth and Delivery › Birth Outcomes › Maternal Morbidity
Ugochinyere Vivian Ukah, Sid John, Lauren Yearwood, Giulia M Muraca, Neda Razaz, Yasser Sabr, Paul J Yong, Mohamed A Bedaiwy
U Ukah, S John, L Yearwood, G Muraca, N Razaz, Y Sabr, P Yong, M Bedaiwy
PMID 36258133 36258133 DOI 10.1542/peds.2021-055855 10.1542/peds.2021-055855 Lisonkova et al. 2022, Lisonkova 2022