To compare spinal bone mineral density (BMD) and 1-year BMD change between premenopausal vegetarian and nonvegetarian women.
Design
Cross-sectional comparison of spinal BMD at baseline and prospective comparison of a subsample.
Setting
A western Canadian metropolitan area. Subjects/samples: Healthy vegetarian (n = 15 lacto-ovo-vegetarian, n = 8 vegan) and nonvegetarian (n = 22) women aged 20 to 40 years, with regular menstrual cycles and stable body weight completed baseline measurements. Twenty of these women (6 lacto-ovo-vegetarian, 5 vegan, 9 nonvegetarian) participated in repeat measurements at approximately 13 months. Statistical Analyses Performed: Descriptive statistics, independent sample and paired t tests, 1-way analysis of variance, correlation analysis, and stepwise multiple regression were used to compare groups and to assess associations with BMD.
Results
At baseline, subjects were 27.2 +/- 5.1 years old. Vegetarians had lower body mass index (21.1 +/- 2.3 vs 22.7 +/- 1.9, P < .05) and percent body fat (24.0 +/- 5.5% vs 27.4 +/- 5.1%, P < .05); they also tended to have lower BMD (1.148 +/- 0.111 g/cm2 vs 1.216 +/- 0.132 g/cm2, P = .06), although this was not apparent with weight as a covariate (P = .14). Baseline BMD was predicted by vitamin B-12 intake and total body fat (R2 = .24, P = .001). Participants in the follow-up differed only in their being older than nonparticipants. Over 1 year, mean BMD increased significantly (1.1%): by diet group, nonvegetarians' BMD increased but vegetarians' BMD was unchanged. No other monitored variables were associated with BMD change. Applications/
Conclusions
Vegetarian women should be aware of links between low BMD and low body weight/body fat, and should maintain adequate intakes of nutrients believed to affect BMD.
Prior JC premenopausal bone mineral density vegetarian, spinal bone density vegetarian vegan women premenopausal, vegetarian diet bone mineral density prospective comparison, low body weight body fat BMD premenopausal women, vitamin B-12 intake bone mineral density prediction, lacto-ovo-vegetarian vegan nonvegetarian BMD cross-sectional, Barr Prior vegetarian bone health menstrual cycle, premenopausal women spinal BMD one year change, body composition total body fat bone density association, regular menstrual cycles vegetarian diet bone loss
PMID 9664916 9664916 DOI 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00172-2 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00172-2 Barr et al. 1998, Barr 1998
Cite this article
Barr, S. I., Prior, J. C., Janelle, K. C., & Lentle, B. C. (1998). Spinal bone mineral density in premenopausal vegetarian and nonvegetarian women: cross-sectional and prospective comparisons. J Am Diet Assoc, 98(7), 760-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00172-2
Barr SI, Prior JC, Janelle KC, Lentle BC. Spinal bone mineral density in premenopausal vegetarian and nonvegetarian women: cross-sectional and prospective comparisons. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98(7):760-765. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00172-2
Barr, S. I., et al. "Spinal bone mineral density in premenopausal vegetarian and nonvegetarian women: cross-sectional and prospective comparisons." J Am Diet Assoc, vol. 98, no. 7, 1998, pp. 760-765.
Rondanelli M et al., 2020·Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS)·
Open Access
Boron is a trace element that plays an important role in numerous biological functions, including calcium metabolism, growth and maintenance of bone tissue. However, there are still no precise indications regarding a possible role of boron supplementation, and its amount of supplementation, to maintain bone health. So the aim of this narrative review was to consider the state of the art on the effectiveness of boron supplementation (alone or with other micronutrients) on growth and maintenance of bone in humans through control of calcium, vitamin D and sex steroid hormone metabolism in order to suggest a daily dosage of boron supplementation. This review included 11 eligible studies: 7 regarding the supplementation with boron alone and 4 regarding supplementation with boron and other nutrients. Despite the number of studies considered being low, the number of subjects studied is high (594) and the results are interesting. The studies considered in this narrative review have evaluated the positive effectiveness on bone, in humans, through control of calcium, vitamin D and sex steroid hormone metabolism, considering a dietary supplementation of 3 mg/day of boron (alone or with other nutrients); this supplementation is demonstrably useful to support bone health (in order to prevent and maintain adequate bone mineral density), also considering the daily dose of 3 mg is much lower than the Upper Level indicated by EFSA in the daily dose of 10 mg.
Zhou W et al., 2013·J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact·
Our objective was to study changes in calcium and vitamin D intakes over time, and their cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with bone mineral density (BMD). We followed 9382 women and men aged ≥25 and 899 aged 16-24, for 10 and 2 years respectively. Calcium and vitamin D intakes increased over time in adults, but decreased in women aged 16-18. The increased intakes in adults were largely attributable to the increased use of calcium and/or vitamin D supplements. Both the percentage of supplement users and average dose among users increased over time. There was nevertheless a high prevalence of calcium and vitamin D intake below the estimated average requirement. At baseline, higher calcium and vitamin D intakes were associated with higher total hip and femoral neck BMD in young men, and cumulatively high levels of calcium and vitamin D intakes over time contributed to better BMD maintenance at lumbar spine and hip sites in adult women. Although total intakes, particularly of vitamin D, frequently fell below the Institute of Medicine recommendations despite an increase over time in supplement use, we found some positive associations between total calcium and vitamin D intake and bone health.
Velmahos AH et al., 2026·Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine·
Open Access
To evaluate the extent to which a history of infertility is associated with adherence to specific diets among reproductive-aged females. Cross-sectional analysis Between 2017–2023, 7,227 North American female pregnancy planners aged 21-45 years enrolled in PRESTO (Pregnancy Study Online), a preconception cohort study. Participants completed self-administered baseline questionnaires during preconception. Exposure: Infertility history, defined as: 1) self-reported 12-month clinical infertility, 2) history of visiting a clinician for an infertility work-up, and/or 3) clinician-identified cause of infertility (e.g., ovulatory or tubal). Adherence to specific diets, including vegetarian, vegan, Mediterranean, Paleo, Weight Watchers®, ketogenic, dairy free, gluten free, Atkins®, South Beach®, Zone®, raw foods, or other at baseline. Multivariable log-binomial regression models estimated the prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, income, and body mass index (BMI). The percentage of participants with a history of infertility was 26% based on the 12-month clinical infertility definition, 30% based on visiting a physician for infertility evaluation, and 26% based on an infertility diagnosis following a physician visit. Overall adherence to any particular diet was low (4.6% vegetarian, 2.8% ketogenic, 1.7% Weight Watchers®, 1.4% Mediterranean, 1.3% vegan, 0.8% Paleo, and all other diets: <0.8%); 86.6% reported not adhering to any particular diet. A history of 12-month clinical infertility was associated with lower adherence to vegetarian (PR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.60-1.03), Paleo (PR=0.43; 95% CI: 0.19-0.98), and Weight Watchers® (PR=0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.91) diets. An infertility history involving a medical work-up was associated with a higher prevalence of adherence to a ketogenic diet (PR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.17-2.09). Participants whose infertility was attributed to ovulatory or tubal causes were nearly two times more likely to adhere to a ketogenic diet (PR=2.01; 95% CI: 1.38-2.94; PR=2.22; 95% CI: 1.09-4.49, respectively). The cross-sectional design cannot establish temporality or causality. Data on dietary patterns and infertility history were self-reported, which can introduce misclassification. Generalizability may be limited because participants were pregnancy planners not using fertility treatments; participants were also more likely to be non-Hispanic White and of higher socioeconomic status than the general population. The ketogenic diet was more prevalent among females with an infertility history, while vegetarian, Paleo, and Weight Watchers® diets were less prevalent. These associations mirror the results of studies evaluating the reverse relationship, suggesting that some patients with infertility seek information for behavioral modifications via evidence-based medicine.
Declining fertility, overlooked mental health, and reduced life expectancy underscore the urgent need for renewed attention to men's health. A semen analysis, traditionally used to assess fertility, holds untapped potential as a tool for promoting lifestyle changes and preventing chronic diseases in men. Spermatogenesis is highly sensitive to environmental and lifestyle factors and can be an early indicator of overall health. Disruptions in this process can signal underlying systemic issues and predict long-term health risks, including cardiovascular disease and metabolic disorders. An increasing number of men seek to engage in preconception care, as fertility is closely tied to a man's sense of masculinity, identity and aspirations for fatherhood. In this context, a semen analysis can be a powerful motivator to encourage healthy behaviours and proactive health management. By incorporating semen analysis into primary care, health care providers can leverage men's desire for fatherhood as an entry point to discuss broader health concerns, such as mental well-being, nutrition and physical activity. This approach would address immediate reproductive health, and also promote long-term wellness, helping to reduce the burden of chronic disease in men.