Q-IVF, 2017

Q-IVF Annual Report 2017: Fertility Treatments in Sweden (Treatment Year 2015)

Q-IVF, National Quality Registry for Assisted Reproduction

Read at source

Key figures

Registry history

Measure Value Source
Cumulative assisted-reproduction treatments registered in the Q-IVF registry, through 2015 more than 160,000 How we collect data section

Treatment volume, 2015

Measure Value Source
IVF clinics operating in Sweden, 2015 17 Introduction
Publicly run IVF clinics, 2015 6 Introduction
Privately run IVF clinics, 2015 11 Introduction
Clinics reporting into the Q-IVF registry, 2015 100% Introduction
IVF and related fertility treatments started, all types, 2015 Approximately 19,244 Table 1
Fresh IVF/ICSI cycles as a share of all started treatments, 2015 61.1% Figure 3
Freeze cycles as a share of all started treatments, 2015 32.3% Figure 3
Donor insemination as a share of all started treatments, 2015 5.0% Figure 3
Fresh IVF/ICSI cycles started, 2015 (registry table count) 11671 Table 1
Freeze cycles started, 2015 (registry table count) 6162 Table 1
Oocyte-donor cycles started, 2015 146 Table 1
Inseminations started, 2015 (registry table count) 960 Table 1
Fresh IVF/ICSI cycles started with own gametes, 2015 11,896 Figure 1
Frozen embryo transfer cycles started with own gametes, 2015 6,087 Figure 1
Combined fresh and frozen cycles started with own gametes, 2015 17,983 Figure 1
Fresh IVF/ICSI cycles started, own gametes, public clinics, 2015 4467 Figure 1
Freeze cycles started, own gametes, public clinics, 2015 2605 Figure 1
Fresh IVF/ICSI cycles started, own gametes, private clinics, 2015 7429 Figure 1
Freeze cycles started, own gametes, private clinics, 2015 3482 Figure 1

Donor treatment, 2015

Measure Value Source
IVF cycles started using donated sperm, 2015 466 Figure 15
IVF cycles started using donated oocytes, 2015 529 Figure 15
Inseminations performed using donated sperm (AID), 2015 959 Figures 19-20
Delivery rate per insemination using donated sperm (AID), 2015 15.1% Figure 20
Deliveries from IVF using donated sperm, all cycle types, 2015 184 Table 5
Deliveries from IVF using donated sperm, fresh cycles, 2015 109 Table 5
Deliveries from IVF using donated sperm, frozen cycles, 2015 75 Table 5
Deliveries from IVF using donated oocytes, all cycle types, 2015 94 Table 4
Deliveries from IVF using donated oocytes, fresh cycles, 2015 40 Table 4
Deliveries from IVF using donated oocytes, frozen cycles, 2015 54 Table 4
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, donated sperm, fresh cycles, women under 30, 2015 45% Figure 17
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, donated sperm, freeze cycles, women under 30, 2015 48% Figure 17
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, donated oocytes, fresh cycles, women aged 40-41, 2015 56% Figure 18
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, donated oocytes, freeze cycles, women aged 40-41, 2015 46% Figure 18

Fertility preservation, 2015

Measure Value Source
Own-oocyte freezing cycles performed, total, 2015 305 Table 1 and Figure 23
Own-oocyte freezing cycles for oncological (fertility-preservation) reasons, 2015 112 Table 1 and Figure 23
Own-oocyte freezing cycles for non-medical (social) reasons, 2015 192 Table 1 and Figure 23

IVF outcomes, 2015 (own gametes)

Measure Value Source
Live birth rate per started cycle, fresh IVF own gametes, all ages, 2015 23% Figure 9
Delivery rate per started cycle, fresh IVF own gametes, age under 30, 2015 28% Figure 9
Delivery rate per started cycle, fresh IVF own gametes, age 30-35, 2015 26% Figure 9
Delivery rate per started cycle, fresh IVF own gametes, age 36-37, 2015 22% Figure 9
Delivery rate per started cycle, fresh IVF own gametes, age 38-39, 2015 16% Figure 9
Delivery rate per started cycle, fresh IVF own gametes, age 40-41, 2015 13% Figure 9
Delivery rate per started cycle, fresh IVF own gametes, age 42 and over, 2015 7% Figure 9
Live birth rate per embryo transfer, fresh IVF own gametes, span across age groups under 30 to 42 and over, 2015 37.8% to 8.6% Figure 10
Live birth rate per embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer own gametes, span across age groups under 30 to 42 and over, 2015 32.1% to 17.8% Figure 10
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, fresh IVF own gametes, single embryo transfer, all ages, 2015 30% Figure 11
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, fresh IVF own gametes, double embryo transfer, all ages, 2015 25% Figure 11
Deliveries from fresh IVF with own gametes, total, 2015 2,506 Table 3
Deliveries from fresh IVF with own gametes, after single embryo transfer, 2015 2,116 Table 3
Deliveries from fresh IVF with own gametes, after double embryo transfer, 2015 390 Table 3

Embryo transfer practice, 2015

Measure Value Source
Single embryo transfer rate, fresh IVF own gametes, 2015 82% Figure 7
Single embryo transfer rate, frozen embryo transfer own gametes, 2015 96% Figure 7
Share of transfers done on day 2-3, fresh IVF cycles, across age groups, 2015 79-82% Figure 8
Share of transfers done at blastocyst stage (day 5-6), freeze cycles, across age groups, 2015 25-39% Figure 8

Multiple births, 2015

Measure Value Source
Multiple birth rate, fresh IVF cycles, 2015 4.5% Table 2
Twin birth rate, fresh IVF cycles, 2015 4.5% Table 2
Triplet birth rate, fresh IVF cycles, 2015 0% Table 2
Multiple birth rate, frozen IVF cycles, 2015 3.0% Table 2
Twin birth rate, frozen IVF cycles, 2015 2.9% Table 2
Triplet birth rate, frozen IVF cycles, 2015 0.1% Table 2

Trends

Measure Value Source
Delivery rate per insemination using donated sperm (AID) (2012, for comparison) 14.5% Figure 20
Delivery rate per insemination using donated sperm (AID) (2013, for comparison) 17.2% Figure 20
Delivery rate per insemination using donated sperm (AID) (2014, for comparison) 16.6% Figure 20
Single embryo transfer rate, fresh IVF own gametes, span from 2012 to 2015 74% to 82% Figure 7
Single embryo transfer rate, freeze cycles own gametes, span from 2012 to 2015 89% to 96% Figure 7
Number of IVF treatments started in Sweden, span from 1992 to 2015 approximately 3,000 to approximately 19,000 Introduction
Share of all children born in Sweden conceived through IVF almost 4% Introduction

Patient experience, 2016 survey

Measure Value Source
Respondents to the patient satisfaction survey (IVF-KUPP), 2016 2,496 Figure 26
Patient satisfaction with medical care, 2016 survey 92% Figure 26
Patient satisfaction with staff approach, 2016 survey 91% Figure 26
Patient satisfaction with information given, 2016 survey 83% Figure 26
Patient satisfaction with accessibility, 2016 survey 78% Figure 26
Patient satisfaction with involvement in decisions, 2016 survey 66% Figure 26

Our summary of the report's published figures, each citing its table, figure or section. The full report is at the publisher's link.

Topics

Q-IVF et al. 2017, Q-IVF 2017

Related articles