Assisted Reproduction · Registries and Reporting

Q-IVF Annual Report 2022: Fertility Treatments in Sweden (Treatment Year 2020)

Q-IVF, National Quality Registry for Assisted Reproduction

Q-IVF, 2022

RRM Academy Synopsis

28% of fresh IVF embryo transfers in Sweden in 2020 ended in delivery

About 28 out of 100 fresh IVF embryo transfers ended in a delivery in Sweden in 2020, against 36 out of 100 frozen transfers. The figures come from the national registry's report on cycles with the couple's own eggs and sperm. Delivery per embryo transfer fell with each older age group.

Key Findings

  • Swedish clinics started 22,868 cycles in 2020, 1,000 fewer than the previous year. The report captures almost 100% of the country's treatments that year.
  • Per embryo transfer with the couple's own eggs and sperm, delivery rates were 28.1% for fresh cycles and 36.1% for frozen cycles. Of started fresh cycles, 18% ended in a delivery.
  • Delivery per embryo transfer fell from 38.4% under age 30 to 14.0% at ages 40-41 for fresh cycles, and from 42.3% to 21.1% for frozen cycles.
  • The cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval, counting all embryo transfers within one year, rose from 28.8% in 2007 to 43.2% in 2019.
  • Single embryo transfer made up 89% of fresh and 99% of frozen transfers with own gametes in 2020. Twins accounted for 2.82% of 2020 deliveries after fresh cycles and 1.44% after frozen.

Interpretation

The report is the national registry's yearly summary of cycles started in 2020. The design has no randomization and no comparison group of couples who did not undergo IVF. Outcome tables are grouped by cycle type, age group and clinic, with no breakdown by cause of infertility. The registry notes that the number of embryos transferred varies with the patient's prognosis and that clinics treat different types of patients. Confidence intervals are wide for most clinics. The registry traces the higher frozen rates for older women largely to embryos that may have been frozen at a younger age.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine examines both partners, guided by cycle charting, to find what keeps them from conceiving. Clinicians then treat that cause. IVF bypasses the reproductive system without learning why conception fails. The registry tables show outcomes by cycle type and age, with no breakdown by cause.

Key figures

Treatment volume, 2020

Measure Value Source
Total started IVF/ICSI cycles using own gametes, 2020 16 712 Table 1
Fresh-cycle count among started IVF/ICSI cycles, own gametes, 2020 9822 Table 1
Freeze-cycle count among started IVF/ICSI cycles, own gametes, 2020 6890 Table 1
Number of IVF clinics reporting to Q-IVF, 2020 20 Notes from the Head of the Registry

IVF with own gametes, 2020

Measure Value Source
Clinical pregnancies from IVF/ICSI, own gametes, 2020 4979 Table 1
Deliveries from IVF/ICSI, own gametes, 2020 4212 Table 1
Live-born children from IVF/ICSI, own gametes, 2020 4270 Table 1
Embryo transfers performed, IVF/ICSI own gametes, 2020 13 125 Table 1
Fresh IVF treatments begun, own gametes, 2020 9819 Figure 7
Live birth rate per started fresh cycle, own gametes, 2020 about 20% Figure 7
Live birth rate for cycles reaching embryo transfer, fresh, own gametes, 2020 28% Figure 7
Delivery rate for started fresh IVF/ICSI cycles, own gametes, all ages, 2020 18 percent Figure 13
Delivery rate for started fresh IVF/ICSI cycles, own gametes, ages 30-35, 2020 23 percent Figure 13
Delivery rate for started fresh IVF/ICSI cycles, own gametes, age 42 and older, 2020 5 percent Figure 13
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, fresh IVF/ICSI, own gametes, all ages, 2020 28.1 percent Figure 14
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, freeze cycles, own gametes, all ages, 2020 36.1 percent Figure 14

Embryo transfer practice, 2020

Measure Value Source
Single-embryo transfer rate, fresh IVF transfers, own gametes, 2012 to 2020 74% to 89% Figures 10a and 10b
Single-embryo transfer rate, freeze-cycle transfers, own gametes, 2020 99% Figures 10a and 10b

Multiple births, 2020

Measure Value Source
Twin birth rate per delivery, fresh IVF/ICSI, own gametes, 2020 2.82% Figure 11a
Twin birth rate per delivery, freeze cycles, own gametes, 2020 1.44% Figure 11a

IVF with donated gametes, 2020

Measure Value Source
Delivery rate after fresh transfer, own oocytes with donated sperm, 2020 27% IVF with donated gametes section
Delivery rate after frozen-thawed transfer, own oocytes with donated sperm, 2020 36% IVF with donated gametes section
Delivery rate per insemination, donated sperm (IUI-D), all ages, 2020 15.5% Figure 28
Delivery rate per insemination, donated sperm (IUI-D), women under 30, 2020 20.0% Figure 28
Share of donated-oocyte transfers done as freeze cycles, 2020 about 90% IVF with donated oocytes section
Delivery rate per transfer, donated oocytes, freeze cycles, 2019 to 2020 26% to 38% IVF with donated oocytes section

PGT and fertility preservation, 2020

Measure Value Source
Delivery rate per embryo transfer, PGT cycles, 2019 to 2020 33% to 40% Figure 8
Delivery rate per oocyte retrieval, PGT cycles, 2019 to 2020 24% to 34% Figure 8

Cumulative live birth

Measure Value Source
Cumulative live-birth rate per oocyte retrieval, counting all transfers within a year, 2007 to 2019 28.8% to 43.2% Figure 21a

Our summary of the report's published figures, each citing its table, figure or section. The full report is at the publisher's link.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Assisted Reproduction › Registries and Reporting › National Registry Data
Q-IVF et al. 2022, Q-IVF 2022